Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

The Best or Worst Pollsters in the 2012 Election How did Nate Silver Do It? (Gallup is Dead Last)
Patheos ^ | 11/13/2012 | Tim Suttle

Posted on 11/14/2012 8:36:10 AM PST by SeekAndFind

Nate Silver has gotten a lot of press for his near perfect election night predictions. In 2008 Silver gained popularity and influence after he called 49 out of 50 states. Many pundits were predicting that Silver would crash and burn in 2012. Instead, he outperformed his 2008 predictions and now that Florida has been called for president Obama, Silver can tout a perfect record 50 out of 50 states called correctly.

How did Silver do it?

Only Likely Voters Matter: This is one obvious reason Silver’s method outshines everyone else. Anything other than likely voter models is useless information. This is key. Early in the race, many polling outfits poll registered voters. Silver ignores them. Likely voter models are astronomically more accurate, but they are expensive. In registered voters v. likely voters, you get what you pay for.

Weighing the Data Correctly: You have to be able to handicap the pollsters. For polling data, sample size is everything. The higher the sample size, the better the data – unless the data is bad. Silver consistently fares well because he knows that all data is not created equal. Folks like Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight blog are polling aggregators. They put together many different polling samples from many different polling outfits, and use them to get a bigger sample size – which is fine. But, the key is in how you weight the data in your model. Silver knows how to do this better than anyone. He grinds it out, interviews the pollsters, combs through their methods and doesn’t take shortcuts.

Correcting for Bias: Silver’s stock in trade is his ability to look at a polling outfit’s methodology and track record, then correctly assess how their data is biased and corrects for it. So for instance, if CNN is predicting a candidate has a 3 point lead. Silver looks at all of the factors, and assigns them a bias number – let’s say 1.7 points bias for that candidate. Silver would actually change the CNN result from a 3 point lead to a 1.3 point lead. He changes other people’s polling data to correct for their bias! Then assigns the poll a weight (higher the bias, less the weight it seems to me – Silver doesn’t give out that information), and plugs it into his model.

Math trumps ideology: FiveThirtyEight’s magic formula isn’t public, but all along Silver gave hints as to what he was doing. In the end this is why I put so much stock in Silver’s predictions. He had been telling us all what the polling would do for months. He not only predicted the elections, he predicted the behaviors of the polls for the last 2-3 months of the election cycle. This is because Silver’s final bias correction was toward his own outfit. He kept this analysis in the realm of numbers, not ideology. He’s not an ideologue (self described in an NPR interview as more of a libertarian), he’s a math nerd. It has paid off three elections in a row

Post-Mortems on 2012 Polling
Now that all of the polling information is out there, Silver and his team are sorting through it. As he breaks down the data, there were three things that really surprised me:

The Top Five Pollsters in 2012

  1. Investor’s Business Daily wins the most accurate polling data for 2012
  2. Google – came in a close second
  3. The Mellman Group, led by Mark Mellman, shined again this year in third place
  4. RAND Corp., a non-profit research group, came in fourth.
  5. CNN finished out the top 5

Other notables

6. Reuters – just out of the top five
11. Quinnipiac – middle of the pack for one of the high profile polls
12. Marist
19. Zogby

Who Were the Worst Pollsters in 2012?

American Research
Gallup was dead last

TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; elections; gallup; natesilver; polling; pollsters
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 11/14/2012 8:36:14 AM PST by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Pollsters set the vote percentage to aim for, then the hacked machines did the rest, simple. Its all a game now that is playing us like charms.

2 posted on 11/14/2012 8:40:08 AM PST by sunmars
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Silver still didn't predict Obama's 7.5 million voter drop off. That means his real method is to pull this stuff out of his nether regions and toss it against the wall.

That he did better than the others was luck ~ probability that he'll do as well again is ZERO. But he'll get the marketing business this year and they won't.

3 posted on 11/14/2012 8:42:00 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The Chicago Mob shared their projected voter fraud outcomes with him.

4 posted on 11/14/2012 8:45:27 AM PST by SC_Pete
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He figured out what was going on with Twitter and Facebook and was not calling land-line phones.

5 posted on 11/14/2012 8:47:46 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Gallup should have been dead on with Obama vs Romney numbers because they use cell phones in their polling now. BUT - If you look at their data download, problem was they were shut down several days from huricane Sandy and that kind of messes up a milti-day rolling average. Their Obama approval poll however kept on going through the storm. If you look at Obama’s numbers alone it explains election day.

6 posted on 11/14/2012 8:53:32 AM PST by ExxonPatrolUs (The Ameritopian Motto: Gov The Sheeple, Buy The Sheeple, Bore The Sheeple)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

I’d hardly call it luck, considering that he called the last two presidential elections correctly (hitting 50 of 50 in the latest) and projected a significant Republican gain in the last mid-terms.

7 posted on 11/14/2012 8:54:53 AM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Coronal

He called them correctly. HOWEVER, his probability for an 0bama win was >90%. There is NO WAY to prove that it wasn’t, say, 70%.

However, his model has been fairly accurate (more accurate than most) at calling many races across the country.

8 posted on 11/14/2012 9:07:05 AM PST by cizinec ("Brother, your best friend ain't your Momma, it's the Field Artillery.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah

You can pretend that it was luck if that makes you feel better but all the aggregators got most of the states right.

9 posted on 11/14/2012 9:07:52 AM PST by FewsOrange
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

There was such a split between two groups of pollsters that I have to think these polls were being used to justify a fraudulent outcome. Those that the administration could manipulate knew the outcome ahead of time.

During the runup I kept telling my wife that I thought they were using the polls to demoralize people or to justify their inevitable calls of suppression. She just kept saying that the polls were just telling us how much they plan on cheating. Now, I think she was right.

10 posted on 11/14/2012 9:08:16 AM PST by Bigjimslade
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I just opened an envelope postedmarked 2004 & removed a note that said "Karl Rove is a buffoon". Easiest prediction ever.

11 posted on 11/14/2012 9:18:50 AM PST by ksen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cizinec

And no way to prove that he wasn’t correct.

12 posted on 11/14/2012 9:24:05 AM PST by Coronal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Mabye he knew the computer programer of the voting machines!!!

13 posted on 11/14/2012 9:26:29 AM PST by dalereed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

They factored in vote fraud.

Very few people in the inner cities have land lines so how did they question any of them??? They didn’t. They just knew that there would be enough fraud PRN to get them over the top.

14 posted on 11/14/2012 9:32:02 AM PST by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sunmars
all this polling talk is MOOT since there really wasn't an election.....

any insider rat could have predicted what was going to happen 2 yrs ago....

Romney DID win in a landslide...

15 posted on 11/14/2012 9:43:23 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: jackmercer

Ping to FR’s own master poller. Jackmercer is one of the (VERY) few who called this election correctly. He got slaughtered for it, but he was right.

16 posted on 11/14/2012 9:44:34 AM PST by spetznaz (Nuclear-tipped Ballistic Missiles: The Ultimate Phallic Symbol)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip; sunmars; All

Col Allen West; "I don't want to see America become like Zimbabwe where people don’t trust their electoral process. If we cannot trust the integrity of the voting system then we are no longer a free republic".

Col West has opened the door.

We must fight election fraud.

It falls on ‘We the People’.

There’s overwhelming evidence of fraud.- Here

SARAH PALIN speaks out on Twitter about massive Obama machine voter fraud:

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks Between suppression of the military vote and voter fraud, Obama stole another election. …DEMAND A RECOUNT! #VoterFraud

>Sarah Palin News ‏@SarahPalinLinks People need to stop pointing fingers within the GOP and investigate the Dems' massive voter fraud and suppression of the military vote.


>MITT ROMNEY in 2012! ‏@PlanetRomney #tcot The Competent Conservative: Elections Have Not Yet Been Certified, Here’s What You Can Do:

>> These electi...


Excerpt from Mitt Romney's reference:

These elections are NOT certified yet. The only way to get this investigated, much less recounted or overturned, is through the Secretary of State of each of the five key states: Florida, Virginia, Ohio, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. EVEN IF YOU ARE IN ANOTHER STATE you can help. But it won’t do any good to dilute our effort to challenge California or Michigan or other states. Until a major group gets involved to do more, here is the plan: Contact the Secretary of State of the state in question. See contact information below...

Read the rest- Here

The website,'Barack Obama Vote Fraud 2012' is keeping a running account of cases of voter fraud and what to do about it:


> Visit the site- Here
Sign this petition- Here

Another website:

Is There Enough Evidence of Voter Fraud To Merit a Recount? If you wish to add your voice, click here and sign the petition for a recount Here-

< Hannity and Col Allan West slam voter fraud Nov 12- Here

Photo of Ethiopians brought to Ohio voting stations by busload, 95% of whom did not speak English, and told to vote for Obama, straight Dem ticket- Here

Must watch videos!

VIDEO-- Programmer Testifies About Rigging Elections With Vote Counting-


VIDEO- Illegal Aliens Caught Voting and Stealing Elections In Florida In Vast Numbers- Here

VIDEO- MICHAEL SAVAGE: How Obama fixed the 2012 election- Here

VIDEO- Massive voter fraud discovered in April- Here

VIDEO- Whistle blower speaks out about voter fraud- Here


We can not wait for 2014 and 2016 to regroup and figure out new strategies. By then it will be too late. The Marxist/Muslim usurper will have completed his planned distruction of America. That's what people fail to understand.

We must act NOW.

Start with the election. If we let the Rats get away with this massive voter fraud, we're no better than a bananna republic.

We must keep digging and pounding him every day, in every way we can- phony birth certificate, Benghazi, Fast and Furious, his hidden life, records....

We are FReepers. We must fight!

Those who shrug and accept this atrocity without a fight are not worthy to be called Freepers!

Join us!! See thread, 'BARACK OBAMA FRAUD 2012- (MUST READ- MUST GO VIRAL!)' thread- Here

17 posted on 11/14/2012 9:51:23 AM PST by patriot08 (Native Texas girl)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

He was fed internal poll data by the Chicago gang?

18 posted on 11/14/2012 10:04:09 AM PST by rfp1234 (Arguing with a liberal is like playing chess with a pigeon.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cherry
I refuse to believe that 100's of thousands of people conspired across nearly a dozen swing states and no one came to a republican office demanding money for proof. Sounds legit.

If you want to stay in your echo chamber go ahead, but if you want to come out to the real world us conservatives have a lot of people to talk to, reform to implement, and minds to change. If you want to help we could really use you. but spreading conspiracy nonsense just because you don't like the results isn't going to help anyone.
19 posted on 11/14/2012 10:05:31 AM PST by HenryArmitage (it was not meant that we should voyage far.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: FewsOrange

Show one pollster who got the number of votes for Obama correct ~ there’s a reason they stay away from that

20 posted on 11/14/2012 10:06:08 AM PST by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794 is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson