Feinstein wondering WTH is going ON here...
I was just about to post the question about if anyone had read that Petraeus had gone to Benghazi only a few days before the election?
Diane ‘calico curtains’ Feinstein isn’t the least bit interested in the truth.
Do I dare say I like Feinstein on this? How long before she gets a visit and will she listen to people warning her off?
Yeah, I had heard that on Beck, yesterday. This is just getting beyond strange.
All part of a ruse that the Rat pukes are pulling. The only serious acts this individual undertakes is to steer billion-dollar government contracts to her husband’s businesses and to defend Red China and her husband’s business interests in Red China.
So ... how did that subpoena for F & F documents work out? The administration just promptly complied and turned them over, right? </sarc>
It’s still smoke and mirrors. Always.
They want him under the bus.
Feel free to contact Senator Feinstein:
Washington, DC Office:
331 Hart Senate Office Bldg.
Washington, D.C. 20510
Phone: (202) 224-3841
Fax: (202) 228-3954
The day that MSNBC gives Dianne Feinstein a microphone to threaten the Obozo administration with a subpoena leaves not a single doubt that absolutely nothing is as it appears.
5............4...............3............2...........until DiFi gets that call from the WH.
This tidbit or large mouthful re Petraeus’s trip to Libya, was not covered by the mediots and barely surfaced here.
He may have been ready to drop the boom on the Chicago Thugs with what really happened before, during and after our people were killed!
Then the Chicago Thugs dropped the affair bomb on him.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2959056/posts
ABC: Petraeus conducted own investigation in Benghazi after attack
Hotair ^ | 11/13/2012 | Ed Morrissey
Posted on Tuesday, November 13, 2012 12:11:01 PM by SeekAndFind
Yesterday, Dianne Feinstein threatened to subpoena the CIA over a trip report from David Petraeus that he allegedly wrote after a personal trip to Benghazi after the terrorist attack that killed four Americans. Today, ABC News reports that Petraeus’ visit to Libya was no mere observational tour. The then-Director of Central Intelligence conducted his own interviews with personnel on the ground in Libya in preparation for testimony that has now been cancelled:
In late October, Petraeus traveled to Libya to conduct his own review of the Benghazi attack that killed four Americans, including U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens.
While in Tripoli, he personally questioned the CIA station chief and other CIA personnel who were in Benghazi on Sept. 11 when the attack occurred.
The Libya stop was part of a six nation trip to the region. Petraeus intended the review as a way to prepare for his upcoming testimony before Congress on Benghazi.
“He was looking forward to testifying,” a Petraeus friend told ABC News. He wanted to be fully prepared.
This makes the decision to withdraw Petraeus from the hearing even more curious. According to their source, Petraeus thinks that acting DCI Michael Morrell can testify to Petraeus findings and add more of his own, plus Petraeus wants to avoid a media circus after the revelation of his affair.
However, while that may be understandable, those reasons arent enough to deprive the committees of his personal perspectives. Petraeus has years of hands-on experience dealing with terrorist networks as a military commander. Morell has over 30 years experience in the CIA and can obviously give a good accounting of the intelligence, but doesnt have Petraeus insight. Plus, after having personally conducted the reviews in Libya, Congress needs Petraeus to expand past whatever made it into his trip report the very document that the CIA is now reluctant to share with Feinstein and other Congressional investigators.
Feinstein will turn out to be the political equivalent of false advertising.
She’ll holler, shout, make a show of being tough, play act before the adoring journalists on TV, and then ultimately when push comes to shove, show that she is nothing but a loyal democrat who won;t do anything about a serious cover up.