Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Petraeus hoped affair would stay secret and he could keep his job as CIA director
Washington Post ^ | November 12, 2012 | Sari Horwitz, Kimberly Kindy and Scott Wilson

Posted on 11/12/2012 7:12:29 PM PST by Seizethecarp

CIA Director David H. Petraeus did not intend to resign from his position until it became clear that his extramarital affair with his biographer would become public after a federal investigation of his e-mail accounts, according to two longtime military aides who admire the retired general.

“Obviously, he knew about the relationship for months, he knew about the affair, he was in it, so yes, he was not going to resign,” said Peter Mansoor, a retired Army colonel and Petraeus’s executive officer during the Iraq “surge,” who spoke Monday with the former general for about half an hour. “But once he knew it was going to go public, he thought that resigning was the right thing to do. There is no way it would have remained private.”

Steven Boylan, who served as Petraeus’s public affairs officer during that same 2007-2008 period in Iraq, said the retired four-star general “felt he had to [resign] once he knew it would be made public. He didn’t feel he could lead the organization with this being out there.”

(Excerpt) Read more at washingtonpost.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Foreign Affairs; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: benghazi; gwot; navyseals; obama; petraeus; threatmatrix; threatmatrixbenghazi
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last
To: Seizethecarp
“Obviously, he knew about the relationship for months, he knew about the affair, he was in it, so yes, he was not going to resign,” said Peter Mansoor

Yes, Peter, thanks for that astute observation. Petraeus was in the relationship so, yes, obviously Petraeus knew about the relationship. Good grief, man, think about what you say before talking to the press

21 posted on 11/12/2012 7:58:11 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

Have to agree - Cantor did NOT do his sworn duty here! He is therefore liable here.


22 posted on 11/12/2012 8:00:43 PM PST by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bigheadfred

Do you think it is strange, really?
Gradually Obama has been throwing everything that Americans have trusted and relied on OUT.
The military has been made to accept gays.
Religion has been under assault.
Our schools are a mess with teacher’s not teaching but brainwashing.
Banks are not being thought of highly anymore.
Realtors same thing.
Now FBI, CIA are thought of not qualified do to their jobs.
What next....


23 posted on 11/12/2012 8:01:26 PM PST by mojo114 (Pray for our military)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: dalebert

You’re absolutely correct! What’s the matter with these so-called guardians of truth? Even FOX commercials intimate that there’s a connection.

But it’s nuts anyhow. Are we to believe that a single FBI agent, at the request of a “friend,” uncovered what a pretty extensive FBI background-check missed? That no one in Afghanistan noticed what was going on with the general? That Cantor’s aide’s call to the FBI didn’t alert the bureau that it would have to get its story straight with the White House?

Come ON.


24 posted on 11/12/2012 8:06:33 PM PST by Mach9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Betrayus hoped affair would stay secret.

Not when you are working with Chicago Thugs.


25 posted on 11/12/2012 8:20:39 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

If we can’t vote Bonehead and Cantor out of leadership,
Maybe we can scandal them out and get real leaders.


26 posted on 11/12/2012 8:23:24 PM PST by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Obama already used it as blackmail to make sure Petraeus adhered to the administration line three days later that it was the video. It was odd at the time and now we know why.


27 posted on 11/12/2012 8:31:18 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Obama already used it as blackmail to make sure Petraeus adhered to the administration line three days later that it was the video. It was odd at the time and now we know why.


28 posted on 11/12/2012 8:38:10 PM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deagle

A correction - effects should be affects. Thanks to kabumpo for alerting me to the error.

Ah heck, we need a few English majors around to keep us in check...


29 posted on 11/12/2012 9:28:26 PM PST by Deagle (quo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

Am I the only one that doesn’t believe any of this as it’s being presented. These are all different lies covering other lies that come back to a single source. There’s likely a story or two that we may never hear about layered in here as well.


30 posted on 11/12/2012 10:01:10 PM PST by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: annieokie; penelopesire; maggief; Protect the Bill of Rights; thouworm; SE Mom; Nachum; onyx; ...
Well, looks like the pinger slept while the world heaved. I'm up now though. Catching up.

Anyone wanting on or off this ping list, please advise.


Benghazi Index

31 posted on 11/12/2012 10:05:28 PM PST by MestaMachine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob
Am I the only one that doesn’t believe any of this as it’s being presented.

No...

the infowarrior

32 posted on 11/12/2012 11:33:58 PM PST by infowarrior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

” .,..retired Army colonel and Petraeus’s executive officer during the Iraq “surge,”...”

Probably an indication of sloppy reporting. A 4-star would rate a general officer as an XO. This colonel was probably an aide while an O-5. If he was an aide he would be in a position to know a lot about the general’s personal life — much more than an ‘executive officer” probably would know.


33 posted on 11/13/2012 3:25:57 AM PST by Tallguy (It's all 'Fun and Games' until somebody loses an eye!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp
“felt he had to [resign] once he knew it would be made public. He didn’t feel he could lead the organization with this being out there.”


34 posted on 11/13/2012 8:59:33 AM PST by Donald Rumsfeld Fan (The)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Seizethecarp

I have one question for the WaPo............Why did the President let 4 Americans get murdered on Sept 11,2012?


35 posted on 11/13/2012 10:12:17 AM PST by ColdOne (I miss my poochie... Tasha 2000~3/14/11 0bie don' t eatl my dog!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-35 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson