Borrowed from Rush:
We are the Resistance!
Please Donate Today!
Posted on 11/12/2012 1:51:04 PM PST by Jim Robinson
Edited on 11/12/2012 1:56:02 PM PST by Jim Robinson. [history]
It is clear that Obama hates the U.S. Constitution. Has himself stated that it's a flawed document and it and the courts do not go far enough in saying what the government must do for you on your behalf in regards to social and economic justice and the redistribution wealth. He says the courts have failed to remove the constraints on government from doling out social and economic justice, so it must be done legislatively.
In a 2001 interview, Obama says:
"If you look at the victories and failures of the civil rights movement and its litigation strategy in the court, I think where it succeeded was to invest formal rights in previously dispossessed people, so that now I would have the right to vote. I would now be able to sit at the lunch counter and order and as long as I could pay for it I’d be OK.
But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn't that radical. It didn't break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf.
And that hasn't shifted and one of the, I think, tragedies of the civil rights movement was because the civil rights movement became so court-focused I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change. In some ways we still suffer from that."
And more recently, President Obama threatens that if he cannot get the congress to move, he will find ways to go around it. He will rule by executive order and do whatever it takes to get around the congress that stands in his way of correcting the wrongs in the constitution.
And during the campaign, President Obama instructs his followers that if they bring a knife, you bring a gun. And in the very last days when he thought he was losing the election, "President" Obama reaches out to "his" community with the call to "Vote for revenge!"
It's clear that not only does Obama hate the constitution, he hates the rule of law, hates liberty, agrees with Rev Wright his mentor that America should be damned by God and calls for violence and revenge from the bully pulpit!
The admitted Marxist Obama swore an oath to defend the constitution but is now aiming to destroy it by his own hand, and to destroy American liberty, all in the name of economic and social justice, redistributionism and REVENGE!
A true leftist revolutionary wannabe dictator now sits on his throne, scheming to mete out his brand of justice and revenge, unencumbered by the "flawed constitution," the courts, the threat of removal by election or, with traitor Reid in charge, removal from office by impeachment.
Will Obama become America's Cesar, er, Hugo Chavez? The socialist democrat Dream Act is the vehicle to get it done.
NOT ON MY WATCH!!
This is treason!!
And the wimps in the GOP are too afraid to take this obvious leftist treason head-on. Worse, they're urging that the Republican party must move left!
We must RESIST such tyranny to the hilt!!
If not us, who?
If not now, when?
Socialism always leads to communism and mass graves-
Could someone post Valerie Jarrett’s comments about revenge after the election?
Write letters to those who no longer represent our best interests? Wait two years and vote again? Give the GOP one more chance to un-f*ck itself?
Do you really think any of that will work?
Soap, Ballot, and Jury box are broken. Our options appear... Limited.
I can be rather revolting if I put my mind to it.
Going Galt - consider it your part in the Cold Civil War.
the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution . . . that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf. . . . I think there was a tendency to lose track of the political and community organizing and activities on the ground that are able to put together the actual coalition of powers through which you bring about redistributive change.
Jim, thanks for calling attention to this 2001 interview, made when Obama was an Illinois state legislator. It was aired on a Chicago radio station, as I recall. I have thought for years that this interview was the most telling "reveal" of who the real Obama is. He hates the Constitution's "negative liberties" and seeks "redistributive change." Well, these are exactly the things he's been working on since he's been in office, and I don't expect him to slow down. He is the most radical Marxist/socialist/leftist ideologue we have ever had as president.
AGREED!
So what’s the plan?
“Those who insult Islam have no future”
He was talking about America. We have no future with him in office.
I’m still in the “bring it on mindset”, been there for quite some time.
Barry Half-White just circumcised the republican party..
The pain may make it a better cleaner party..
-OR- a John to pay democrat whores.. WAIT!.. thats what it is NOW.....
Yes, unfortunately the republican hierarchy does not relish confrontation with the leftists.
IMHO most important issue the conservatives must is to force the leaders to address is how easy it is to cheat in our election process. Cheaters vote multiple times from multiple locations, electronic machines can be easily manipulated, security of ballots is handled by too many small precincts, etc.
Most republicans do not cheat because most lead honorable lives and have a lot to lose if caught doing fraud. OTOH many democrats are the 47% who have a lot to lose in welfare benefits if their candidate loses.
Judge Andrew Napolitano: Revolution is Duty of the People
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Af5KJ2aD8F0
Please do not misconstrue what I wrote. I’m not calling for revolution or civil war. My point is, the President of the United States is on the verge of doing so. Calling the constitution a flawed document, threatening to go around the congress, ruling by executive order, urging “social justice,” Marxist redistribution, violence and revenge from the white house. He’s in fact calling for leftist revolution. We must resist such treason and tyranny to the best of our ability.
Yes, that may be true, but make no mistake, the ligature is being tightened.
Flashpoints always seem to happen spontaneously and are seldom some organized event. What people are saying is that we are nearing that flashpoint.
Through massive vote fraud, a propagandist media, and compliant courts, he won without firing a shot. If anything, he’s baiting us into firing first. Then, like Nero, he will blame the Christians, the Tea Party, FR, Limbaugh, and every other reliable right-wing group he can name. His people, the looters and takers, will fight back on his behalf and the courts and so-called law enforcement will look away until we regroup and counter-attack.
Remember the White Russian Army after the revolution. We have God, morality, and honor on our side. He has hordes of bloodthirsty tribal savages who hate everything we stand for with a demon-inspired passion. And he has the Mohammedans as his reserve force.
I’m not saying that we lie down and surrender, but we need to be prepared to to sell our lives very expensively.
I guess me and death will become close friends if that ever comes to pass
The problem is that we have jobs we can’t leave, and nobody is going to bus us to DC for free.
Then the congress (specifically the House) will for Obama's spending plan. It's the same as with the USSC, they knew he would do Obamacare regardless of what they said, so they ruled for it. It's the threat of being irrelevant that will make them vote (along with bribes and real threats).
One specific method Obama could use is the TARP strategy. He could create a big bill full of spending, some taxes, and maybe pretend to negotiate. Then threaten that if the House doesn't pass it, the markets will crash and the economy will sink. Then, just like TARP, the House will cave. How do I know? My rep (Wolf R VA) who ignored my letters and calls and thousands more like it and sent a form letter saying he had to vote for TARP because otherwise we would increase the deficit. Thanks in part to that vote we got Obama and an massively increased deficit.
If Obama doesn't get his House vote he can help the media and other players arrange a 1000 point market crash. Then the House will wimp out and pass his budget. The only good thing to come of it will be a better possibility of a third party.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.