Excuse me for confining my point to the “Mexican” issue. You are correct, I did not include poor people in Malaysia who come to the U.S. to have anchor babies. Therefore, you are correct.
My final post. You are simply wrong, and now even more wrong if you specifically think that amnesty will remove the anchor baby lure of the millions of poor Mexicans still in Mexico.
Mexicans in the many thousands per year will continue to come across our southern border to give birth to their anchor baby in the US, amnesty or no amnesty. The long list of benefits available to the US citizen anchor baby will still be there.
You just refuse to see that amnesty only affects those already in the US, and does nothing to remove the incentive for those outside the US to still come in illegally for anchor baby births, and, to wait for the next amnesty.