Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Schumer urges weather agency to keep Sandy labeled a tropical storm (insurance purposes)
The Hill ^ | 11/11/12 | Zack Colman

Posted on 11/11/2012 3:28:13 PM PST by Libloather

Schumer urges weather agency to keep Sandy labeled a tropical storm
By Zack Colman - 11/11/12 04:23 PM ET

Sen. Chuck Schumer (D-N.Y.) is urging the federal weather agency to avoid labeling super-storm Sandy a hurricane because doing so would raise insurance deductibles.

Schumer sent a letter Sunday to the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) and insurance companies warning that classifying Sandy as a hurricane could boost deductibles to $20,000, compared with $1,000 for a tropical storm.

Schumer says insurers are seeking to have Sandy labeled a hurricane to cut their losses from the devastating natural disaster.

“Today, we’ve sent a letter to NOAA, the weather agency, as well as to the insurance companies that we’re looking over their shoulder. We want NOAA to keep this classified as a tropical storm and to save homeowners in New York and Long Island thousands of dollars and we don’t want the insurance companies to play any games,” Schumer told WCBS 880.

Early projections have said the toll from Sandy’s damage could total $50 billion for the East Coast. New York’s tab alone could reach $33 billion.

Sandy was classified as a category 1 hurricane until it made landfall, at which time weather forecasters said it became a post-tropical storm.

Interest groups and lawmakers on both sides of the aisle are taking a look at private insurers’ role in coastal areas subjected to the effects of climate change. Private insurance firms are growing reluctant to cover those areas, which are expanding because of climate change.

Green groups and Democrats warn that extreme weather, including storms like Sandy could become more common. While climate scientists could not definitively say climate change caused Sandy, they attributed the storm’s intensity to rising sea levels and warmer waters.

Instead, the federal government has often footed the bill for flood insurance in coastal regions — often at the expense of taxpayers. The Hill’s E2-Wire has more on that here.


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Extended News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: climatechange; globalwarming; sandy; schumer; storm; tropical
Cat 1, close to a Cat 2, turns into partly cloudy with possible showers. Chuckie sure does have a lot of power.
1 posted on 11/11/2012 3:28:24 PM PST by Libloather
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Libloather

If he can change the definition of weather for “insurance purposes” then certainly he can change the definition of diseases for Obamacare. So instead of say cancer, we will just call it an infection.

For “insurance purposes” of course.

Liberals. Stuck on retarded.


2 posted on 11/11/2012 3:36:42 PM PST by unixfox (Abolish Slavery, Repeal The 16th Amendment!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Rising sea levels?

Didn’t Barry promise to do something about that? /s


3 posted on 11/11/2012 3:41:14 PM PST by TXBlair (What the crap is wrong with you, America???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
and under Obamacare we can call skin cancer poison ivy.
4 posted on 11/11/2012 3:42:19 PM PST by Deepest South
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

In flyover country they will say it was straight line winds instead of a tornado, so they can avoid any disaster relief.


5 posted on 11/11/2012 3:46:02 PM PST by Chipper (You can't kill an Obamazombie by destroying the brain...they didn't have one to begin with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Actually this is the first thing Chuck the Schmuck has ever said that I agree with.


6 posted on 11/11/2012 3:47:02 PM PST by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Nonsense!

Sandy was only a bit of morning fog propelled by a zephyr....for insurance purposes only... /sarc

That’s the problem with electing lawyers; reality is defined by legislation, litigation and literature (bureaucratic pronouncements).

As the Clinton Cronies said, “Stroke of the pen; law of the land! Pretty cool, huh?”

Schumer is obviously Jewish. How else did he get so much chutzpah?

(My apologies to all the decent Jewish folks out there. We Gentiles just don’t have a word quite as good as ‘chutzpah’ to describe the statements of some of these Congress Critters.)

Shalom!


7 posted on 11/11/2012 3:54:43 PM PST by BwanaNdege (Man has often lost his way, but modern man has lost his address - Gilbert K. Chesterton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
The weather channel has now started naming winter storms which is, IMHO, the begining of a scam for insurers. I’m sure the are hyping for ratings but I see them normalizing the name game for deductable abuse!
8 posted on 11/11/2012 3:55:33 PM PST by outofsalt ("If History teaches us anything it's that history rarely teaches us anything")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Hurricanes, storms? They are just words that liberals can redefine at will to suit their purposes. There are no facts or truth. There is only the reality that is decreed upon us by our overlords.


9 posted on 11/11/2012 3:57:33 PM PST by plain talk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

Who does he think pays the difference? Mean corporations? Santa Claus?


10 posted on 11/11/2012 4:40:02 PM PST by lacrew (Mr. Soetoro, we regret to inform you that your race card is over the credit limit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather
"Insurers are permitted to charge hurricane deductibles in certain circumstances. However, as the National Weather Service classified Hurricane Sandy as a post-tropical storm prior to landfall in New Jersey, the storm did not meet the first regulatory threshold required to apply a hurricane deductible."

I thought that this was all settled last week.

Can't Chuck-E-Cheese Schumer read, or did he just need his weekly "fix" of attention in front of the TV cameras?

11 posted on 11/11/2012 5:24:19 PM PST by Sooth2222 ("Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of congress. But I repeat myself." M.Twain)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Libloather

They should call in the pros from BLS (Bureau of Lying Statistics). Those people can turn a recession into a slow recovery. A simple hurricane to tropical storm could be easily done with statistics to back it up!


12 posted on 11/11/2012 5:26:59 PM PST by RetiredTexasVet (The law of unintended consequences is an unforgiving and vindictive b!tch!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: unixfox

And then they turn around and lambaste the insurance companies for high rates....


13 posted on 11/12/2012 2:52:33 AM PST by trebb (Allies no longer trust us. Enemies no longer fear us.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

Were the insurance contracts written to account for this kind of political manipulation?


14 posted on 11/12/2012 2:55:20 AM PST by Gene Eric (Demoralization is a weapon of the enemy. Don't get it, don't spread it!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson