Posted on 11/11/2012 12:48:30 PM PST by NYer
There are some notable medical issues that bear discussion. (I happen to despise nosy politicians even more than immoral porn).
1. Porn stars aren’t getting AIDS. Undoubtedly, they are tested regularly, but the reality is that they’re getting ordinary STDs. Of course unprotected anal sex with an infected man remains an effective way to transmit AIDS, and there is plenty of that in porn, but if the guy never receives anal sex (or shares needles), then he’ll never get it to pass on.
2. Comparing STD rates to the community, or sexually active adults (which includes marrieds) is junk science. The comparison is with active singles, or some such.
3. That 3/4 of cases are among women is also junk science, because we don’t know size of the male and female porn populations.
4. The male performer who says he got HIV on the job did gay porn.
“Los Angeles County voters passed a referendum requiring pornographers to wear condoms to cut an outbreak of disease.”
Shouldn’t it be the same for homosexuals? If not why not?
Homo’s spread more disease than pornographers and prostitutes
combined.
Not much of a change there, people are still getting screwed there...
Regards,
GtG
Since the rest of Hollywood is already here, They should come to GA to film
No Pun intended
Let's get all the females from 12 to 52 on long-term hormonal implants. Let's give Planned Parenthood a hundred million dollars to scatter glitter over the "slut" concept for all the dear young Vagina-Americans. And then let's see if we can get the gonorrhea rate to double every six weeks.
Pretty soon all the girls will be sterile from untreated gonorrhea, and --- No conceptions! No pregnancies! No births!
In a generation, no future, no America, no more human life. It's much better than condoms, better than Abortion Rights! It's the Final Solution!
It’s all a good measure of how angry the rest of the world really is with the US Constitution!!!!!!!
“Shouldn’t it be the same for homosexuals? If not why not?”
difference between private bedrooms and commercial enterprise that can be publicly regulated
“While Measure B might provide a measure of protection for porn stars, it does nothing to protect the millions of consumers of porn,”
Condoms will take away much of the fantasy in porn. That’s a good start.
“Simply reading, considering and/or discussing the initiative violates the public conscience.”
If the ballot measure wasn’t there, the $14 billion industry would still exist.
True. But regardless how we voted, the ballot measure made us all complicit in the porn industry.
*** I ran a distribution center next door to a porn studio in Tampa Florida....
Believe it or not, it is now a IRS building****
So no change was there.
Darn it! Beat me to it!
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.