Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Ted Grant
Yeah, but that could describe half of the Federal government, couldn't it?

I halfway suspect you’re writing this letter because you want specific people to read this column and deduce who is involved and what’s really going on behind closed doors (without actually addressing the conflict in person). That’s not ethical, either.

This seems a little strange -- considering that "The Ethicist" went out and did print the letter in his/her column anyway.

2 posted on 11/10/2012 6:33:48 AM PST by Alberta's Child ("If you touch my junk, I'm gonna have you arrested.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Alberta's Child

My thoughts exactly. Why publish the letter at all if The Ethicist had this concern?

But the email does say that the affair was with a high profile person.


3 posted on 11/10/2012 6:36:45 AM PST by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Alberta's Child

My thoughts exactly. Why publish the letter at all if The Ethicist had this concern?

But the email does say that the affair was with a high profile person.


4 posted on 11/10/2012 6:37:04 AM PST by Ted Grant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson