Someone please expose "The Democrat Ground Game"

[HalTa]

When Romney was ahead in the polls {Gallup, Rasmussen} by 5 to 6%, the democrat strategists showed no concern. I don't know how many times that I heard "Mumbles" Beckel brag that the democrat "ground game" was so superior they would squash Romney. Romney had absolutely no chance of defeating Obama. Why were they so positive of Romney's defeat? Could it be that Beckel and his cohorts already new of the massive voter fraud already in place in every battleground state?

Of course, the answer is YES. The next question is, what are the Republicans and all patriotic Americans going to do about it?

If the answer is "nothing", America is indeed well on the path to extinction. We cannot allow our highest office in the land to become captive to Chicago Ward politics.

[LTC.Ret]

It is ENTIRELY possible that we DID NOT re-elect Obama. As each story is posted about serious voter fraud -— drip, drip, drip -— it is becoming more and more obvious that the election was stolen instead of won.

The saddest thing of all is that our elected leaders who CLAIM to be CONSERVATIVE will brush all this off and not do a single thing about it. The Republican Party should SUE each and every voting district where Obama received 99%-100%-108% of the vote. Surely there are TRUE PATRIOT lawyers who would take up this gauntlet pro bono.

I will watch and wait to see if anything is done -— but I must confess my expectations are low. Like many others, the criminal element of the Democrat party has tried us and pushed us, and found us to be a soft target. Who can blame them for taking advantage of an adversary who refuses to fight back from even the most blatant provocation!?!

[Cowboy Bob]

Just think... In 1992, the Democratic Party was ready to collapse. But fortunately, H. Ross Perot stepped in to save them.

[hosepipe]

[ Someone please expose ;The Democrat Ground Game ]

OK I’ll do it...

Democrats WANT......

1) Less American national sovereignty..
2) a World Givernment based on socialism..
3) A mass public that can be MILKed like farm animals..
4) An ignorant public totally brain washed toward socialism..
5) An elite that farms and culls the public like wolves..
6) Women groomed to be addicted to their feelings and emotions..
7) Men that are cowards afraid of the givernment..

**Note; Democrats are already there, republicans slowing being “converted”.. listening/watching FOX News that carries subliminal messages towards those ends..

[dfwgator]

In 1992, the Democratic Party was ready to collapse. But fortunately, H. Ross Perot stepped in to save them.

You mean Mr. "Read My Lips" saved them.

[struggle]

Call your governors office and demand they investigate. If they do, the federal government will soon by sweating bullets.

Just like Bush’s amnesty - if enough people do it, they will fold. If just one governor does it, it will inspire the others.

[reformedliberal]

Re: *unrelated areas*:

There are no unrelated areas. I have been trying to tell conservatives, including GOP party operatives for years that one way the Dems beat us is that they co-opt every group out there from Lamaze to FFA. There are undeclared political operatives as real members of every group in every community. They make friends, become trusted,ferret out which leftist agendas are going to appeal to each group (GW, animal rights, environmental controls, tax the rich, free child care, medical care, et al)and then work to make sure the members know the position of whichever Democrat candidate from the lowest to the POTUS on that issue. They stand up at every meeting and announce fundraisers and GOTV actions people are encouraged to participate in. They use these memberships to form other ad hoc groups to support other agenda items. They rail on any position advocated by the right, and if they see anyone beginning to think for themselves, they sic a *mentor* on them, pronto, to make sure any information the potential dissenter has come across is demeaned as *conservative rhetoric*.

They also compile the various illegalities committed by anyone in the group. This is used as a last resort or as leverage in the event of a defection.

This is 24/7/365 and it is in addition to their jobs, their families and their recreation. These operatives do work. Many have professional degrees. Many own their own businesses and they can also then use employment as a recruiting tool.

They will run for any office available, at any time. The attitude is that no position is too small to not be of use.

It is a myth that all Democrats are spongers. Many, many are comfortable to wealthy or middle class. They BELIEVE in their cause. They walk their talk. And they make sure they are out there among the folks who are struggling in order to support them and earn their trust.

No doubt, some of them went to Ranger School, as well.

[Doghunter]

A major contributor to any possible voter fraud is the electronic voting machine. No paper ballot, no way to go back and verify accurancy after the election. He who controls the voting system controls the outcome of the election.

Voter ID is another big issue, makes you wonder why the administration was so upset about voter ID in some states, but not in others.

[JennysCool]

This was an email sent out by the Obama campaign on Nov. 4 and posted on Free Republic that day.

Interesting how it fits in with your suppositions ...

---

“Friend —

This is cool:

You can see exactly how many people named the same as you have already voted.

Take a look at that. Then share it with your friends so they can see how many people with their names have voted, too — and look up their polling place.

Bottom line: We need every person with your name — and everyone else, too — to make it out to the polls to support President Obama.

So help get the word out — and the vote:

http://my.barackobama.com/Your-Name

Thanks,

Yohannes”

---

Hmm ...

[billthecat]

We should take care to remember though that the Gallup and Rasmussen polls were the outliers. Most other polls were much closer to the mark. And even Gallup and Rasmussen tightened up considerably ahead of the election. In the end, the election results actually very closely matched the polling averages.

[military cop]

Alot of people go. Not many make it.

I’m not telling you this is going to be easy or an overnight solve. But we’ve run into the same types of operatives at local and family levels overseas as well and we turn the tide by tailoring the message and making it repetetive.

I’m not even saying this is the only or exact way to get the pendulum swinging in the other direction. But consider this:

Special operations forces have been doing this very thing in the third world for over 70 years. an OVERWHELMING majority of retired SOF are Reagan Republicans and have been selling the concepts of conservatism to those who have never comprehended them for decades.

Who better than the RNC to hire to consult in planning for a Hearts and Minds operation in vulnerable blue areas?

This is not a plan to compromise our values to create a larger tent. Its a plan to educate values that will sell themselves to create a larger tent.

RLTW

[Kadric]

What differance would it make when they can toss the poll judges they don’t like out of the poll station for 4 hrs.

[RckyRaCoCo]

Try THIS

The other day I watched a related story, one segment showed these folks going to senior homes/centers and busing them to early-voting outlets... where I'm sure there were plenty of pre-voted ballots available...

...all meant to make those "fragile" voters experience less complicated/time consuming of course.

[mo]

Not to grab this problem by the horns and deal with it...give permission for us to remain disenfranchised.

“Direct” disenfranchisement refers to actions that explicitly prevent people from voting or having their votes counted, as opposed to “indirect” techniques, which attempt to prevent people’s votes from having an impact on political outcomes (e.g., gerrymandering, ballot box stuffing, stripping elected officials of their powers).

http://www.umich.edu/~lawrace/disenfranchise1.htm

[Boogieman]

“You can’t just pick 2 good polls and ignore everything else out there.”

Are you talking about Romney or Drudge? Romney didn’t just look at 2 polls, he commissioned his own polls, from multiple sources, to check against each other.

[Yulee]

I know that the turnout locally was way, way ahead of 2008. There were long, long lines for early voting, and also on election day, yet we are told that the turnout was less than in 2008. There needs to be a effort in each state to document the number of people who signed in to vote and the actual count. I have a feeling that votes disappeared, and in some cases there were more votes than signatures.

We kept hearing that poll workers were signing voter rolls, with the excuse that they were just signing for absentee voters, whose ballots had been received.

It seems that an absentee stamp in the space for the voter's signature, would have been easier, and could have been done before election day. Now you can't tell whether the voter actually showed up at the polls, was absentee, or someone voted for them.

I am very concerned that people who never have voted, voted on election day, and the dead voted for Obama from beyond the grave.

To paraphrase Stalin, It's not who votes, how they vote, but who counts the votes, that matters.

[woweeitsme]

I would make it a felony to toss out poll watchers.

[duffee]

We need to return to a policy in ALL states of ONE LEGAL VOTER, ONE VOTE. end early voting, e-mail voting, registrating when you vote, multiple absentee ballots sent to one address and used at other addresses, require photo voter ID and not a library card that asks for no proof of who you are or where you live and they then put your picture on it and you can use it for ID to vote. No electronic tabulating or recording of ballots that are not marked by the voter and retained by the voting machine, if the ballots are discovered in the trunk of someone’s car they will not be counted. Counties and states should be responsible for counting and tabulating the vote in their state with full access by all concerned parties and hard copies kept of everything. We should keep a close watch on the absentee voting as well and absolutly gurantee that military ballots are sent out in a timely fashion and are correct and can br received back in time to be counted. The way things are going the results of turnout and the vote total will be announced and they may never even be any relation to what happend and the results announced. If we can’t insure an honest election nothing else we do will matter.

I have no faith in our national federal election results. The NYU Brennan Justice Center is against Voter ID or anything else we do to insure honest elections, their main mantra is disenfranchisement, I’m disenfranchised when my vote only counts .95%. The last line of one of their papers makes my point “VOTER ID only makes a difference in the close elections anyway”. We just had a close election and the deciding votes in the swing states were very close, not to mention many House and Senate seats. The democrats cheat and there ground game is to cheat and because they cheat the believe they are entitled to the close elections.

[AllAmericanGirl44]

That is both eye opening and chilling.

I wonder, as you are a self professed reformed lib,
is there any language available to make a lib live up to
what they say they are ‘for’? In that I mean, if they
rant about the blood for oil wars and yet, the last 4 years have been silent, is there a way to force their hand so to say? To flush out the hypocrisy at the heart of it all?

I imagine they will be just as quiet the next 4 years and
it really ticks me off that it’s overlooked.

[jjotto]

Obama received TEN MILLION fewer votes in ‘12 than in ‘08.

That’s hardly a genius ground game!