Posted on 11/08/2012 11:03:56 PM PST by WeAreAMERICA
President Obama must have run a great campaign considering the tremendous numbers he put up in numerous big cities. Over in Philadelphia, he was lucky enough to get 90% percent turnout in some districts with over 99% of the vote.
In Cleveland, in some districts he did even better with an astounding 100% of the vote in dozens of locations. For example, in Cleveland's Fifth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts E, F, and G 1,337 to Mitt Romney's... 0. And in case you're wondering, Gary Johnson received more votes than Mr. Romney.
Well, maybe that's just a fluke. In the Ninth Ward, Mr. Obama won districts D-G with a paltry total of 1,740 to... 3. Hey, at least Romney got .2% of the vote!
Okay, what if we look at an entire Ward? No way this trend continues, right? An entire ward. Why not do the First Ward? Obama won that one 12,857 to... 94. This time Romney got .7% of the vote. He's moving up in the world!
In total, there are 21 districts in Cleveland where Mr. Romney received precisely 0 votes. In 23 districts, he received precisely 1 vote. And naturally, in one of the districts where Obama won 100% of the vote, there was 100% turnout. What a coincidence!
By the way, in case you are thinking that Romney did so poorly because maybe those districts were not very populated: Nope. In those 44 districts, Mr. Obama won 14,686 to 23. That's .16% of the vote for Romney.
But Ohio's not important in the electoral college, right?
The elections is over. The “lady parts” have spoken. America lost. These “fraud” stories are a waste of air.
The GOP has let the Rats cheat for decades. This time it killed them.
They’re only a waste because no one will ever do anything about the fraud - it’s so blatant now and it’s just accepted.
The following link has a compilation of many people on twitter bragging about how they voted more than once.
http://www.punditpress.com/2012/11/compilation-of-democrat-fraud-in.html
I think that could be seen as reasoned logic at some level in some instances like this. I do think this reaches the level that come question has to be raised.
When you consider how few votes kept Romney out of the White House, the matter becomes too big and meaningful to deny.
99%, 100%, zero or only two or three votes up against 14,000.
Life doesn’t work that way.
I read a Humman Events story where they said many counties had a 109% count in Ohio. Can’t find it now. Repubs to do nothing. Carl Rove was blowing a gasket. He was right about voter fraud. Crickets chirping.
Look, this dude, Obama, came out of no where with no ID to become POTUS with almost an identical election as his first. What are odds with that? He has never won a fair election in his life without fraud and he did it in a very short span of time. I would say fraud is pretty damn important. Expose him before his second term, arrest him and try him for treason. This is the very least we can do for America.
Well, there you go. There is a record of fraud or admitting to fraud.
That’s true and then Boner comes out on abc conceeding areas of power. There is pure fraud in our face and then everyone folds up. Your % is correct in that is impossible. In lib counties people waiting 3+ hours to vote and then they say the Republican turnout was down from 2004 or 2008. Where are the exit poll tabs when it goes this way? I saw None.
Ya think?
Past time to worry about that, I’m afraid.
“Things fall apart; the centre cannot hold . . .”
Time now to gird our loins . . .
“Death closes all: but something ere the end,
Some work of noble note, may yet be done,
Not unbecoming men that strove with Gods.
. . .
It may be that the gulfs will wash us down:
It may be that we shall touch the Happy Isles,
And see the great Achilles, whom we knew.
Tho’ much is taken, much abides; and tho’
We are not now that strength which in old days
Moved heaven and earth; that which we are, we are;
One equal temper of heroic hearts,
Made weak by time and fate, but strong in will
To strive, to seek, to find, and not to yield.”
And all that
WHY did 3 million less Republicans show up?
Let us not discount voter machine fraud, please...
160K precincts, times 30 ‘R’ votes removed from the results, equals...
Normal fraud in a Humanoid precinct is more likely to be 14,686 to 230, or even 14,686 to 2300. My guess is that ‘D’ votes were INFLATED, while ‘R’ votes were REMOVED from the totals...
Just remove a random percentage of total ‘R’ votes (between 3-37%)
In some precincts, like the ones in Cleveland this algorithm was mistakenly used, thereby making the #s more suspicious...
How would the voting machine know to do this? It’s a computer! You program it, for example, to remove all last names ending in ‘sen’, ‘son’ ‘baugh’, ‘eck’ ‘mann’, etc...
Will Sheldon Adelson or Donald Trump offer 1,000,000 to someone who can prove voter machine tampering existed?
Doesn't make me feel very safe or secure.
My above post is a theory. I don’t know if you can do that with a machine, but I would think it would be easy to do on computerized machines. I would like someone to test this theory.
You guys got it. It was fairly easy with no scruples. Further; how is it there was such a huge line and 3X machines and then the blame is on the .....what is the point..That is what we are to be reduced to. Confusion, suspicion and apathy.
You guys got it. It was fairly easy with no scruples. Further; how is it there was such a huge line and 3X machines and then the blame is on the .....what is the point..That is what we are to be reduced to. Confusion, suspicion and apathy.
Very frustrating where is Superman when you need him
although he may be gay now. The whole world has gone insane and all the crazies are in charge.
They couldn’t outright remove the votes or the totals wouldn’t match with the individual, public voting records. But they could well have a percentage of those votes switched.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.