Posted on 11/08/2012 9:13:02 PM PST by Bigjimslade
If we called the UN in to another country to observe and they followed our practices we’d likely be up in arms too.
Sounds like you know the PA system better than me. In my case my wife and I went to the polls as we ended up in town and the law says you have to go void the ballots and vote on the machines if you aren’t away. Also, she was worried that her ballot might not count because she ticked all the Rs and then acidentally voted the R line as well.
The people at the desk had no clue so they got the judge who told us that “technically you’re supposed to void your ballot” we then said we were worried we miss marked our ballots so he reluctantly took our names and said go vote while he looked for our ballots. When we got in line to sign the book I noticed some others had Voted Absentee next to their name and thought, here we go again, but ours weren’t marked that way. It took about an hour to vote and when we left he still hadn’t found our ballots but didn’t seem surprised. I sent them in about 14 days early.
It sucks to think every election that your vote is being cancelled by fraud. It’s a whole other level to realize someone took away your right to vote after you went through all the trouble to make sure you did the right thing.
When I dropped those ballots in the mailbox my stomach turned as I know those union workers all realize that with email and other mailing options that there is no justification for keeping the postal service at the same size. They also know that the dems are always there to vote any cutbacks down. I’ve lost two things ever in the mail. First, the products I bought from the Romney store, Second, my ballot. Go figure. It might not have happened there as I know a lot of good people work for the post office but it would only take one or two to pull something like that off.
I realize the mail vote in PA is small, around 5% this year but if they got a hold of 2% of the R votes and replaced them with manufactured D votes to keep the numbers the same and add to that the Philly machine that would be enough to change PA’s vote.
I hadn’t heard the Allen West story but that is shocking. We all know early voting was pushed on us as a way to extend the dems ability to commit fraud. Maybe they’ve just perfected it.
I wish I had noted some of the other early/absentee numbers from election night but they were all way off in favor of Obama in the swing states. I just don’t get it. The United State elections project web site has a list of all the OH absentee/early voters and total numbers adding up to 31% of the 2008 vote and they have it as last updated 11/5 before the election. If they had that why would the media not have the same info the next night and why did they start OH with a 60:40 split with a total that didn’t include more than 11% of OH’s voters, most of whom had to be Republican if you consider the 50:36:14 that even the democrats themselves reported for the party breakdown.
I need to find the total # that actually voted in person that night. Subtract that from the total votes counted and if it leaves 31% no obvious fraud but it leaves the 20% reported on election night something happened.
I hadn’t heard the Allen West story but that is shocking. We all know early voting was pushed on us as a way to extend the dems ability to commit fraud. Maybe they’ve just perfected it.
I wish I had noted some of the other early/absentee numbers from election night but they were all way off in favor of Obama in the swing states. I just don’t get it. The United State elections project web site has a list of all the OH absentee/early voters and total numbers adding up to 31% of the 2008 vote and they have it as last updated 11/5 before the election. If they had that why would the media not have the same info the next night and why did they start OH with a 60:40 split with a total that didn’t include more than 11% of OH’s voters, most of whom had to be Republican if you consider the 50:36:14 that even the democrats themselves reported for the party breakdown.
I need to find the total # that actually voted in person that night. Subtract that from the total votes counted and if it leaves 31% no obvious fraud but it leaves the 20% reported on election night something happened.
Nothing about this makes sense, unless there was fraud. The clueless folks are celebrating, but I think a lot of people are scratching their heads and saying something isn’t right here. The facts don’t fit right and it doesn’t feel right either.
Yeppers —
Another Amen to that statement. This wouldn’t have entered my mind if I hadn’t heard story after story of how well we were doing from reliable sources that have told it like it was when we were in bad shape in the past. This election just doesn’t pass the sniff test.
Used to use those damn machines in VA. Never trusted them a bit.
God, I hate to hear stories from people that had that experience, breaks my heart thinking about what it must feel like to see it all happening again in the one place they thought it never could.
Be prepared to hear all about lots of “voters staying home”...the Bipartisan Oligarchy would rather we all stew in that mess..than having us all bothered, and deciding to investigate, about all the voters voting who never voted...
Listening to descriptions of how “Democrats got out their ground game” with “superior ability to bring those to the polls who normally would never go” by the commentators on Fox election night..made me realize..what they actually have done is track names that HAVE NOT VOTED IN MANY, MANY elections cycles....and vote them.
A well-funded project, county-by-county..to examine the names signed in at at the polls..and going out to find those individuals..you’ll find they were never physically at he polls..or they themselves never filled out the absentee ballot....or their names in the death registers.
Lets look at Colorado for example.There were 500,000 more voters for the presidential slot than the state amendments,or ANY other issues on the ballot! Why would a voter just vote for the presidential race and nothing else? Not just a few voters but HALF-A MILLION voters did this! They also claim the voter turnout was 66%,but it was actually 91% of active voters.That sounds just a tad bit high to me.
—You’re right, we didn’t nothing when the started turning out 90% precincts, so they turned out 100% ones, impossible right ? but we did nothing so 110, 120, 150%. How high do you think the turnout will be in Philly precincts this time ? 300% ? would you be shocked? We were supposed to be up in early voting in CO according to everyone, wish I had seen the # for that one at the beginning of the count.
Lets look at Colorado for example.There were 500,000 more voters for the presidential slot than the state amendments,or ANY other issues on the ballot! Why would a voter just vote for the presidential race and nothing else? Not just a few voters but HALF-A MILLION voters did this! They also claim the voter turnout was 66%,but it was actually 91% of active voters.That sounds just a tad bit high to me.
—You’re right, we didn’t nothing when the started turning out 90% precincts, so they turned out 100% ones, impossible right ? but we did nothing so 110, 120, 150%. How high do you think the turnout will be in Philly precincts this time ? 300% ? would you be shocked? We were supposed to be up in early voting in CO according to everyone, wish I had seen the # for that one at the beginning of the count.
And Obama’s minions managed to delay military absentee ballots, rendering them invalid.
— this is the saddest part of the dems fraud and more than anything else should prove that they will sink to any level to win.
Purple ink will not show up well on some darker skin tones. Snookie with a tan, for instance.
Vaseline on the finger that is dipped will allow it to be wiped clean, too.
—I think he was just being a jack-ass but you’re right. Also, I think people should have the right to not vote and have no one know about it as well. If you’re a union worker that shows up without a purple finger the next day you might very well be out of work.
Because that way they can vote for the Democrat President more efficiently and cast about 500 votes an hour instead of the usual 9 or 10.
I saw that story, disgusting. You gotta wonder how many ballots nationwide this is ? It’s gotta be pretty easy work in the inner cities but in some districts they may even have to have people show up and physically vote under someone else’s name. How old fashioned.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.