Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why Mitt Lost and it Wasn’t Very Close
Townhall.com ^ | November 8, 2012 | John Ransom

Posted on 11/08/2012 6:30:05 AM PST by Kaslin

Memorandum to the GOP: When running an election campaign it is often valuable to select a nominee who represents the rank and file of the Party. This is how other Parties do it. Perhaps you might get on board.

Who?

Well let’s start with who not to select.

There was George H.W. Bush, who, while a nice, honorable public servant, won primarily because of the record Reagan established. He lost because the rest of us thought that when he mouthed the words “Read my lips, go to Texas,” he meant “Read my lips, no new taxes.”

There was Bob Dole, a very honorable man too, but not exactly full of policies ideas. Or convictions. He’s the guy who thrilled us with the ringing cry: “I’ve never read the Republican platform.”

Then there was the other George Bush, W.

He also is a nice man; a man full of character, but he led the largest expansion of government power since Jimmy Carter and took us into a war that he stubbornly refused to win until he was all out of options. And while there remain good reasons to fight in Iraq, he also refused to tell the rest of the Party what they were. .

W squeaked out the election in 2000, with a Supreme Court ruling necessary to finally seal the deal. Then in 2004, he fought tooth and nail in a close election contest that in some respects the Party still pays for.

That brings us to McCain, who was decidedly not a nice guy. He was really grumpy. He was grumpy to everyone except his opponent. He was very grumpy to his VP choice, Sarah Palin. And did I tell you that he was really nice to his opponent? Because he was. Maybe that’s because many of his policy ideas fit better in the Democrat Party, than they did in the GOP.

Of course he went down to Barack Obama in 2008.

Which bring us to the next “next-guy-in-line,” Mitt Romney.

Mitt too represented the far left of the GOP. But at least he returned us to the tradition of making sure our guy was considered a “nice” guy.

In any election campaign, if you want to avoid it becoming just a popularity contest based simply on personality- note to Mitt, you wanted to avoid that- it’s very important to bring some real policy contrast to your campaign. For every Obama policy that was an equal or worse Romney policy. The animatronics that make up the Mitt Romney mechanism are good, but they aren’t gonna win too many popularity contests or act as a substitute for real conservative ideals.

Change needs to start happening at the state and local level where top-down party central committees have refused to create coalitions at the grass roots level.

Hence, in the ground game too the GOP is kind of old fashioned, missing critical components that allow the Party to drive the must win contests, like Allen West’s.

It’s great to the ride wave years, but you have to be able to win the close elections. The Democrats aren’t beating Republicans by virtue of ideology so much as mechanics and logistics.

There is a trend at the grassroots level with get-out-the-vote that demonstrates the Democrats’ ability to precisely micro target an additional 4-to-6 percent of the vote, some of which escapes the polling until late in the race.

Simply put, the models that the GOP relies upon, including those relied upon by myself, have failed to adequately account for this. Again, it makes no difference in a wave election, but we pay dearly for it in close contests.

The grassroots on the other side has spent ten years in community organizing, going door-to-door, creating coalitions of issues-driven, ideologically-funded third party groups that can do a lot of heavily lifting for GOTV. The GOP on the other hand has eschewed groups like the tea parties, seeing the grass roots as a hindrance to our chances at being the cool kids at school.

You saw it the results on Tuesday.

The progressive activists worked for it, while GOP worked their top-down magic and expected to ride the wave.

The results in too many cases have been disappointing.

As my friend Greg Graves once explained to me “You gotta win the ones you are supposed to win, and you have to pick off a few you weren’t supposed to.”

The GOP, as usual, picked off the one we were supposed to win.

Again.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial
KEYWORDS: 2012analysis; 2012electionanalysis; blame; romney2012; romneylost
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last
To: Kaslin

IMO it is simple...

MSM
Their editing by omission, holding stories. unfavorable audio/pics.
They can bend public opinion any way they want. And they’re on a mission to do just that.


41 posted on 11/08/2012 7:20:07 AM PST by Vinnie (A)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: all the best

Probably not the first, but ‘early’

GOP (R) E = Elites........RINO

I think....<: <:


42 posted on 11/08/2012 7:21:26 AM PST by xrmusn (6/98 "Hope in one hand and $hiite in the other and see which fills up first".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: all the best

The “E” stands for “Establishment.”


43 posted on 11/08/2012 7:21:40 AM PST by mvpel (Michael Pelletier)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Romney, a liberal, was doomed from the beginning. Unfortunately, he got enough votes that the elites in the GOP will be encouraged to nominate another liberal in 2016.


44 posted on 11/08/2012 7:26:24 AM PST by Tau Food (Praise God. Trust God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Oberon
There was an interesting thread discussing the same themes HERE.

The poster shares an email he got from a Republican friend living in Germany. The friend relates how dems got US citizens living in Germany to participate in the elections and what he found out about about their operations in the states, eg,

"1.That the Democrats clearly have a more effective team operating in the field. For example, my debate opponent from Democrats Abroad had been to many, many Democrat Party training events in DC and had a direct line to vast numbers of not only politicians but also access to an entire administrative support network at party headquarters. All during the night, he knew in real time from party HQ specific exit poll data for strategic zip codes and indicated that the local leaders were reacting in real time to rush in any potential reserves of voters who may not have already voted in those precincts. In other words, they have "troops" in the voting field with multiple levels of leaders and a powerful admin support. If need be, these "troops" will hand carry a voter in to secure the vote.

2) They have an incredible amount of specific data about not only their own constituents but about the demographics of their voters, potential voters, where they live, their occupations (note I didn't say work) , their affiliations (ie churches, unions, social clubs)---and how to get them to actually commit the act of voting. All of this on a house to house basis for strategic precincts. Here I don't mean general data like X% are in the union but specifics like which specific churches in Cleveland will help organize car pools to get voters in specific neighborhoods into the voting booth. Or making sure that specific local union offices are coordinating their efforts with other union halls, social clubs and church groups in specific areas to achieve a huge turnout in their precincts. Or what powerful local community leaders can be counted on to bring their flock into the voting booth. And all of it is gamed out well in advance of the election. In their world, they are very, very, very close to their voters and handle them directly just like their vision of the Nanny State handling citizens. The data is provided by their field operations and continually updated at all times---not only at election times. And furthermore, they seem to have a surprising amount of specific demographic data about Republican voters--or at least about strategic concentrations of them. On one level, this capability could be comparable to the depth of market data that a route salesman would be expected to know about his territory and customers. On another level, this deep capability covers at least all strategically important geographic areas and is strategically managed with the professionalism of military intelligence resources.

3) They have a very effective communications system which coordinates efforts of Nr 1 and Nr2 from the head of the snake all the way down to street level "troops". It works reliably and their team knows how to use it

4) SInce the 2000 election, I have been aware that their team routinely takes advantage of vast pro democrat sentiments overseas to gain a) fundraising from abroad through donations to groups like Democrats Abroad , b) foreign citizens who volunteer to operate programs like phone banks, websites, social media, mailings which can be managed from Europe for example but used to back up the election effort stateside, and c) large armies of energetic Europeans (ie students but also sometimes retirees) who take "vacations" to the USA during vote season and "volunteer" as free manpower to help field operations of democrats.

All very relevant observations about how the other side gets the job done (and get a load of that point number 4!)

Our side needs to realize that the American electorate does NOT just automatically lean conservative anymore, and won't as matter of sheer habit go to the polls and vote republican. We can laugh at the deadbeats and druggies in the ghettos all we want, but it seems the other side figured out a way to get them to the polls and vote. And they did it, for the most part, legally. The lethargy and lack of imagination on our side is just as dangerous as Obama's radicalism.

45 posted on 11/08/2012 7:27:29 AM PST by ishmac (Lady Thatcher:"There are no permanent defeats in politics because there are no permanent victories.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
As God is my witness, I will not vote for demopublican again.

From this day forward, I will vote for the Independent or the Libertarian candidate. I'm done with this "2 party system". There is no "2 party" system. Flame away, but obammy got reelected. That's all I need to know.

I need something new, and it's not the same bullshit that is going on.

FMCDH(BITS)

46 posted on 11/08/2012 7:29:52 AM PST by nothingnew (I fear for my Republic due to marxist influence in our government. Open eyes/see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mvpel; all the best

The “E” stands for “Establishment.”

I had said ‘elite’ BUT I can buy ‘establishment’.....<:

Thanks


47 posted on 11/08/2012 7:31:19 AM PST by xrmusn (6/98 "Hope in one hand and $hiite in the other and see which fills up first".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Cringing Negativism Network

Why buy American? Does it make America stronger?

Blue Eagle didn’t work out in the 30s for America why do you think it would work now? Why do you want to limit the freedom of Americans to buy what they want?


48 posted on 11/08/2012 7:35:15 AM PST by impimp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

translation: Put your resources into a street-level retail ground game, and not $300 million consulting fees to Karl Rove.


49 posted on 11/08/2012 7:40:45 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xrmusn

Although I said I hadn’t a clue about the “e” my guess was either elite or establishment. But those were just guesses.


50 posted on 11/08/2012 7:43:16 AM PST by all the best (`~!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: wolfman23601
If I were the GOP, that would be my compromise. Raise taxes on everyone, not just the rich.

You're forgetting that "boehner" is, I believe, Middle German for "bend over"...


51 posted on 11/08/2012 7:43:24 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: all the best
GOPe

E = Elites = Establishment
(ellites/establishment really the same know-it-alls what's best for us)

52 posted on 11/08/2012 7:45:30 AM PST by Stand Watch Listen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeDude

Please provide counts, not just margins. I smell a rat.


53 posted on 11/08/2012 7:53:53 AM PST by bIlluminati (290 Reps, 67 Senators, 38 state legislatures - Impeach, convict, amend)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SoConPubbie
They picked

Who should the GOP-E have picked?

54 posted on 11/08/2012 7:56:20 AM PST by D-fendr (Deus non alligatur sacramentis sed nos alligamur.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The take away has been the opposite.

The next candidate will be further left than Mitt, and support abortion and gay marriage openly.

55 posted on 11/08/2012 7:56:35 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
The take away has been the opposite.

The next candidate will be further left than Mitt, and support abortion and gay marriage openly.

56 posted on 11/08/2012 7:56:48 AM PST by redgolum ("God is dead" -- Nietzsche. "Nietzsche is dead" -- God.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck
Ground action counts. Do we have to get Democrat advisers to teach us how to do it?

You first have to have a candidate that represents you.

Mitt didn't.
57 posted on 11/08/2012 8:07:45 AM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

We got out micro targeted.


58 posted on 11/08/2012 8:22:49 AM PST by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: HiTech RedNeck

As we said here in Texas, working on the Cruz Crew, #Grassroots Matter


59 posted on 11/08/2012 8:33:05 AM PST by CPT Clay (Follow me on Twitter @Clay N TX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: CPT Clay
We got out micro targeted.

Bingo. Newt Gingrich famously staged a revolution by figuring out how to Nationalize an off-year Congressional election.

Our challenge now is (and I can scarcely believe these words are coming out of me)...figuring out how to Nationalize a PRESIDENTIAL election.

Absent that the Democrats will continue to pick us off playing mirco-targeted very very small ball, using birth control, binders and Big Bird.


60 posted on 11/08/2012 8:33:58 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 58 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson