Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: Boehner needs to claim split mandate
Human Events ^ | 11/7/2012 | Newt Gingrich

Posted on 11/07/2012 4:57:50 PM PST by GVnana

Tuesday’s election results produced two very different mandates and a very troubling question for Republicans — including me.

President Obama won a mandate despite 7.9 percent unemployment — the weakest economy since the Great Depression — high priced gasoline, huge questions about his response to Benghazi, and growing proof of government incompetence in the response to Hurricane Sandy.

Mitt Romney fought a hard and with a well-organized campaign. We should be grateful for their tremendous effort.

But the Obama campaign had a strategy and a structure, and they succeeded.

President Obama can and will claim to have a mandate, although a smaller, narrower one than four years ago.

But Speaker John Boehner can also claim a mandate.

After two years of opposing tax increases, fighting to control spending and investigating waste, corruption and incompetence, House Republicans were rewarded with re-election. That is a real achievement.

(Excerpt) Read more at humanevents.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Agreed.
1 posted on 11/07/2012 4:57:52 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GVnana

The only mandate the dems won is “gimme my free stuff”.


2 posted on 11/07/2012 4:59:43 PM PST by pnut22
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
Boehner needs to claim split mandate.
3 posted on 11/07/2012 5:00:15 PM PST by rfp1234
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

He won’t because he is a certified wimp.


4 posted on 11/07/2012 5:02:06 PM PST by linn37 (Newt supporter here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Newt, Help us hold their feet to the fire.


5 posted on 11/07/2012 5:02:40 PM PST by stanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

“a strategy and a structure”?????????????????? You’re a felon!! You’re a tax evader!! You kill people with cancer!! Yeah, that was some strategy!!!!!!


6 posted on 11/07/2012 5:05:16 PM PST by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Boehner and Christie should go out on a ‘mandate’ and share a good cry.


7 posted on 11/07/2012 5:05:37 PM PST by bramps
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Boehner is NOT the ANSWER,......HE’S the PROBLEM!!!!!!!!!!!!


8 posted on 11/07/2012 5:06:48 PM PST by Doc Savage ("I've shot people I like a lot more,...for a lot less!" Raylan Givins)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

I trust Newt Gingrich. He appears to be ON to something. I wish we could all be gut wrenching honest and look for the answers. Somewhere way back in March the grass roots was trying to get a candidate, and the Republican National Committee seemed at times to sabotage or eliminate candidates. I think one problem was all of the character assasination during the primaries...attacking Rick Perry, then Rick Santorum, and Mike Huckabee, Sara Palin, Herman Cain. They need to get the 8 top contenders, draw straws or sequester them on an island, and spend 3 days grilling them that they need to stand together. I think by the time Mitt was ready for the campaign trail, he had all kinds of accusations by Republicans.
Second, people like Rush Limbaugh, and Glen Beck, and Sean Hannity maybe should get in the race for President? At least it seems that Neil Boortz or Mark Levin at times for the emos’, and geeks comes across as rude, insensitive and cross their sensitivity screens. My grandkids can’t understand...they are entrenched in PC crap and SOMEHOW we’ve got to get the message to them so they understand without shouting?
Third. My girl, Michelle Bachman I felt got shot out of the waters and never was even given a chance. I’d like there to be a strategy to run a woman and a hispanic for the next attempt. Consult more marketing experts instead of political gurus.


9 posted on 11/07/2012 5:09:19 PM PST by rovenstinez
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bramps
Boehner and Christie should go out on a ‘mandate’ and share a good cry.

ROFL

10 posted on 11/07/2012 5:10:05 PM PST by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Instead of driving the spike through Obama’s heart after the first debate, Romney adopted a “don’t lose” strategy and never did go on the offensive after that.


11 posted on 11/07/2012 5:14:06 PM PST by Blood of Tyrants (Why is the government more concerned about protecting a microbe on Mars than an unborn baby here?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rfp1234

NO BOEHNER!!!
NO BOEHNER!!!
NO BOEHNER!!!


12 posted on 11/07/2012 5:14:18 PM PST by pollywog ("O Thou who changest not, abide with me.".......)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Newt is owning up to his failure to figure out the election...and he isn’t engaging in “Blame Romney” crap.

I respect that very much.

Let’s regroup.


13 posted on 11/07/2012 5:17:58 PM PST by SoFloFreeper
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: linn37

Very true. So id Mitch McConnell. Another 4 years of a Do Nothing Congress.

I’m thinking ... Executive Orders. Lots of them.


14 posted on 11/07/2012 5:18:08 PM PST by K-oneTexas (I'm not a judge and there ain't enough of me to be a jury. (Zell Miller, A National Party No More))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
Boehner needs to insist on real cuts.

And not just to spending, but to entire Federal programs and agencies.

15 posted on 11/07/2012 5:21:51 PM PST by BenLurkin (This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
It's not RNC sabotage, or a bad candidacy, or lack of conservative values, or Dick Morris or Karl Rove, etc., etc.,

Let's not forget that ALL reliable indicators had a Romney win. GALLUP, RASMUSSEN, ETC. all showed Romney ahead.

We need to ask, "why were they so wrong?"

The answers are going to come out.

16 posted on 11/07/2012 5:22:59 PM PST by GVnana
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: linn37

He has spine made of jelly!


17 posted on 11/07/2012 5:24:02 PM PST by Mrs. Frogjerk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez
Newt For Speaker (Again)!

As Levin has said several times, there is no legal requirement that the speaker must be elected to the house !

18 posted on 11/07/2012 5:28:27 PM PST by SecondAmendment (Restoring our Republic at 9.8357x10^8 FPS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
Boehner is a pussy. The only thing he cares about is his power and money. He has used our Constitution as toilet paper and looks down upon us as the unwashed masses, even though most of us are smarter and have done more positive things for this country than he.

McConnell is nothing but a fat-faced, dough boy dilettante.

19 posted on 11/07/2012 5:33:09 PM PST by OldMissileer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rovenstinez

There isn’t anyone who knows the game better than Newt, and on top of that, he is wicked smart. Unfortunately, RMSM such as Coulter, Limbaugh, Levin, Malkin, Hume, and a few others were convinced the onnnnnnllllllyyyyy one who could beat Obama was Romney. I don’t know that Newt could have beaten Obama, but there is no way Obama could have kept up with him, intellectually. It’s a shame, we let a true conservative slip right through our fingers.


20 posted on 11/07/2012 5:37:45 PM PST by Toespi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper
Newt is owning up to his failure to figure out the election...and he isn’t engaging in “Blame Romney” crap.

Amen and worth repeating!

21 posted on 11/07/2012 5:41:14 PM PST by StarFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GVnana
President Obama won a mandate . . . . .

Let me stop you there, Newt. Obama did not win a mandate, he alledgedly won an election. The whole "mandate" thing has been overused to give anyone winning an election by 4 votes a "mandate". BS!

Boehner can claim what he wants; he's weak, ineffective and is at his best when he is weeping over something trivial.The long and short of it is this - our government, our political system and our system of laws and justice are broken beyond repair. I've been saying for quite some time that we are at a point where the ills of America can no longer be fixed at the ballot box.

We have only two choices - give in completely and become the slaves of the radical socialists, or fight back. And, we fight back by getting the red states to divorce the blue and become our own independent, sovereign nation. A nation built on the Constitution, the rule of law and upon Judeo-Christian principles; just as the Founding Fathers envisioned it.

It is we conservatives who pay for the excesses of the left and, should we conservatives take our entreprenuership, our industriousness and our money to our own country, the radical socialists of the left will be left shell-shocked and fighting for survival.

My friends, enough is enough.

22 posted on 11/07/2012 5:43:34 PM PST by DustyMoment (Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

No Balls Boner would need balls to do this. And not cry.


23 posted on 11/07/2012 5:50:30 PM PST by Secret Agent Man (I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

“... needs to claim split mandate”

Actually, Republican Senate leader McConnell already did this. I was shocked when he delivered a decent little speech saying that Obama didn’t have a mandate. McConnell specifically mentioned that the people elected a Republican House.


24 posted on 11/07/2012 5:53:00 PM PST by Siegfried X
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

The Republicans need to do an After Action Review (AAR). They need to be brutally honest and they need to follow some kind of methodology. We used to use the Battlefield Operating Systems. I’m sure something similar could be developed for politics.
What they’ll do instead is listen to a bunch of old guys harrumphing about what worked in 1950.


25 posted on 11/07/2012 5:58:03 PM PST by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

I think we are missing a larger point. We cannot cede the entire Northeast and Pacific West and remain viable. We were not defeated on economics, we were defeated on the social issues. And, as much as I hate to say it, Obama remains a powerful figure to the weak-mined among us. We have to eschew some positions to (read: opposition to gay marriage) in order to be viable. We can oppose abortion, but we must promise not to affect that liberty. We can’t be moral absolutists, Christian only, or we will remain a minority party. I say all this with a heavy heart. We must embrace freedom fully and leave moralizing to the pulpit. Let the people decide on their own morality.


26 posted on 11/07/2012 5:59:03 PM PST by FreedomFighter1013 (The Obamas: Grifter-in-chief and Michie the Moocher)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SecondAmendment

THAT would be so sweet.


27 posted on 11/07/2012 6:05:52 PM PST by Gator113 (I would have voted for NEWT, now it's Romney & Ryan.~Just livin' life, my way~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

Good advice from Newt, but Boehner has already “assumed the position” by talking tax increases. Meanwhile Reid has seized the high ground by unilaterally changing the filibuster rules and declaring that the people want gridlock broken. My point: Boehner and McConnell get played everytime there is a chance. The GOP needs smarter, more energetic leadership.


28 posted on 11/07/2012 6:27:30 PM PST by The Sons of Liberty (Never Underestimate the Power of Evil or Evil Doers)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GVnana

bfl


29 posted on 11/07/2012 6:29:13 PM PST by TEXOKIE (Nobody made a greater mistake than he who did nothing because he could do only a little. EdmondBurke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FreedomFighter1013

I don’t think that was it. I think, if anything, we didn’t offer enough of a vision with enough confidence.

Romney said virtually nothing about either gay marriage or abortion, both of which he actually supported when he was governor, so it doesn’t sound to me as if the liberals could have held that against him. Your thinking was precisely the thinking of the GOP when they selected him: get somebody not known for strong “social positions,” somebody who is not a Christian, and somebody who won’t criticize the cultural status quo or Obama personally. The election was supposed to be about the economy, and Romney was supposed to come across as somebody who was morally neutral and pragmatic and knew how to make money.

And even though, theoretically, the economy was the concern of Americans, Romney did well only on those few occasions when he showed a flash of difference and indicated that he did indeed have values and care about something outside of getting elected. But in general Romney offered no alternative vision and he gave people no rallying point. He rarely opposed Obama and came across as so bland that he never galvanized the base, yet while he himself never said anything that could give the Dems ammunition, they still managed to portray him as somebody who was a bumbling, prissy, woman-hating, white racist meanie.

This, by the way, is not blaming Romney for the loss: the blame goes to the strategy, which was a product of his Massachusetts campaign managers, who obviously decided that the Scott Brown approach was the best, that is, portray him as somebody who was value-free and identical to his Dem opponent, except a little better about finances.

I agree that a preachy type (Santorum) wouldn’t have done well, but maybe it should actually have been someone such as Gingrich himself, who has values that do not come from the all-knowing state (the only kind of “values” one will be allowed in the future) and has the intellectual fire-power and passion to defend them and even project them positively. But the GOP-e was scared of him, and I think until the GOP realizes that the only way they will win will be by offering an entirely different vision of life in the US, through a confident, positive, intelligent spokesman, we’re going to continue to play catch up and we’re going to continue to lose.


30 posted on 11/07/2012 6:29:22 PM PST by livius
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SoFloFreeper; All
Newt is owning up to his failure to figure out the election...and he isn’t engaging in “Blame Romney” crap. I respect that very much. Let’s regroup.

Agreed.

I was pretty bummed out about the election all day, but recovering a bit now. I think it is my wife really. She's a more spiritual person, ultimately, than I. :-)

However, the House Republicans' ability to "do ok" as opposed to the disaster that was the Senate, brings up a question. It is true that in a few races, Missouri in particular, our candidate shot themselves, well, maybe not in the foot. The groin would be a more appropriate metaphor. But there were several other Senate races where we had strong candidates running seemingly pretty good campaigns, and we still got klonked. The question is, why did we do ok in the House, and not elsewhere. Vote fraud theories aside, please.

31 posted on 11/07/2012 8:05:34 PM PST by Paul R. (We are in a break in an Ice Age. A brief break at that...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: linn37

Bingo. He’s already been licking Obama’s hand hoping to appease him. Boehner will fold like a cheap tent.


32 posted on 11/07/2012 9:42:09 PM PST by Pining_4_TX ( The state is the great fiction by which everybody seeks to live at the expense of everybody else. ~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Boner needs to sit down with obama and Reid and say this:

“We’ll work with you on the debt ceiling. We’ll agree to allow the taxcuts on what you call the ‘WEALTHY’ to expire. And there’s only one thing we ask from you.”

Then he turns to Reid and says “You resign from the senate. If not, we do not negotiate. In fact, we do nothing and sequestration kicks in and everyone gets a tax increase. We’ll all go off the cliff together. Take it or leave it. I’ll be in my office.”


33 posted on 11/08/2012 12:35:38 AM PST by Terry Mross (Once again I wasted my vote. But I have learned my lesson.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson