“Finally saw some of the Obama ads that ran here in Texas the final week or two before the election. And I have to admit, they kinda sounded good to this conservative. He had killed Osama Bin Laden. He saved the Auto companies. He was trying to solve the budget crisis from Bush.”
Correct.
This was NOT a liberal vs conservative election.
Romney did NOT run conservative, Obama did NOT run liberal.
The foreign policy debate showed not much difference.
Romney thought he could run on Obama’s lousy record and weak economy, but he came up against a dishonest and calculating campaign.
Romney would make a better President, but Obama ran a better campaign.
The social issue was not abortion but ‘birth control’.
Good points. A typical RINO verses DINO election. They only differed on issues that do not really matter to RINO/DINO’s, since they are far above the law anyway. They agree upon the issues that matter to them and they typically have to go way out of their way to appear as if they disagree. For example, McCain attacking Obama on Benghazi, but agreeing with him on Syria. McCain is setting the narrative for the Benghazi situation. That we were attacked by Al Qaeda and not Syria/Iran. Al Qeada is just the miss direction from the truth. We were running weapons to the worlds worst terrorist organizations that were fighting in Syria to topple Assad. And the best way to miss direct that is to blame the attack on Al Qeada, one of the groups that was receiving the weapons.