Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Big win for Brown with passage of Prop. 30
SF Gate ^ | November 7,2012 | Wyatt Buchanan

Posted on 11/07/2012 7:37:04 AM PST by Hojczyk

California will avoid deep spending cuts to public schools and universities, and be able to to pull out of the fiscal swamp without slashing other services further, after voters handed Gov. Jerry Brown's signature tax measure a decisive victory Tuesday.

Proposition 30 had a clear lead Wednesday morning, with 95 percent of precincts around the state counted.

Voters handily rejected a rival measure, Proposition 38.

Brown's tax measure has been his central focus since his election two years ago and will have major implications for the state's finances. If it had been defeated, nearly $6 billion in automatic spending cuts, falling almost entirely on public schools, would have been automatically enacted under the budget approved by lawmakers earlier this year.

Prop. 30 will raise the sales tax by one penny for every $4 spent for four years, while increasing the income tax on the state's highest earners for seven years. It would generate about $6 billion per year. The sales tax hike will go into effect Jan. 1, while the personal income tax increase is retroactive to the beginning of this year.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: moonbeam; prop30; prop38; taxes
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

1 posted on 11/07/2012 7:37:05 AM PST by Hojczyk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

damn!


2 posted on 11/07/2012 7:43:16 AM PST by latina4dubya ( self-proclaimed tequila snob)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

“California will avoid deep spending cuts to public schools and universities, and be able to to pull out of the fiscal swamp without slashing other services further”

Thanks for the laugh.


3 posted on 11/07/2012 7:44:42 AM PST by ScottfromNJ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

All the rich liberals and their uber-expensive houses. Heh.


4 posted on 11/07/2012 7:45:36 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

all to shore up Union pensions..

the Unions own this state..

I no longer fear the future... I now see how this is going to turn out. It won’t be pretty.

The Unions own Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania California, New York Nevada, etc.

I’m done. It will take a complete collapse of this country to right the direction. that collapse is coming.


5 posted on 11/07/2012 7:46:42 AM PST by Chuzzlewit
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

We have dummies in this country.

And we have a liberal Republican establishment that forces on us a liberal candidate every four years, with predictable results.

I’d like Mike Pence to run for President in 2016. But I don’t think the liberal Republican establishment wants to genuinely win.

Good luck with that. “Dude, where’s my country?”


6 posted on 11/07/2012 7:46:42 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Better them than us. I was worried about a federal bailout.


7 posted on 11/07/2012 7:48:58 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

I think Kalifornia should tax all income over the poverty limit at 100%, all corporate fringe benefits eliminated by law, and tax all wealth which exceeds 2x the annual poverty limit at 100%. That should get the Kalifornia gov’t on an even keel, level the playing field, and get their economy moving!


8 posted on 11/07/2012 7:50:22 AM PST by rigelkentaurus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
Prop. 30 will raise the sales tax by one penny for every $4 spent for four years, while increasing the income tax on the state's highest earners for seven years. It would generate about $6 billion per year. The sales tax hike will go into effect Jan. 1, while the personal income tax increase is retroactive to the beginning of this year.

You mean like Pennsylvania's "temporary" Johnstown Flood Tax (passed in 1936)?


9 posted on 11/07/2012 7:52:32 AM PST by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
It would generate about $6 billion per year.

We'll see. Watch out Texas the next wave of Fruit and Nut refugees are on their way.

10 posted on 11/07/2012 7:52:46 AM PST by Timocrat (Ingnorantia non excusat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

Keep worrying. Prop 30 and 39 combined will not cover the State’s budget deficit.


11 posted on 11/07/2012 7:56:21 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

Great. Now more liberal californians will move out. That’s all we need, more damn liberals. Why can’t they stay in their workers paradise?


12 posted on 11/07/2012 8:01:24 AM PST by ABQHispConservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

So there is a tax on the rich for seven years, retroactive to the beginning of this year. Why not make it retroactive to seven years and then no need to carry it “forward”? I don’t understand how a law can be made retroactive.


13 posted on 11/07/2012 8:02:16 AM PST by Anima Mundi (ENVY IS JUST PASSIVE, LAZY GREED)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SoCal Pubbie

True but it will help. California’s answer to their deficit was always “somebody besides us needs to pay this”. The Democrats are firmly in charge of California and they won’t even pass a tax increase because they can’t figure out a way to blame Republicans for it


14 posted on 11/07/2012 8:02:52 AM PST by AppyPappy (If you really want to annoy someone, point out something obvious that they are trying hard to ignore)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: AppyPappy

No it won’t. The revenues from these measures will be less than expected, and the economy’s going to slow anyway, causing lower revenues overall. Plus Sacramento will spend more. I wouldn’t be surprised to see a huge earthquake hit us too, adding billions more in spending to recover.


15 posted on 11/07/2012 8:08:54 AM PST by SoCal Pubbie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya

Take a picture of California, America. This is where you are heading. Preview of things to come.


16 posted on 11/07/2012 8:12:49 AM PST by nicksaunt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk

During Obama’s pathetic first term with property values collapsing, I acquired some out of California properties and now fully document the days spent in each state.


17 posted on 11/07/2012 8:13:36 AM PST by CreviceTool ( Obama is standing above the country above - above the world, he is sort of a God = Evan Thomas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ABQHispConservative

“Great. Now more liberal californians will move out”

3.75 million Californians voted for Romney, we aren’t all Fruit and Nuts.


18 posted on 11/07/2012 8:42:32 AM PST by DAC21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: latina4dubya
we'll see how disingenuous the hollowood people are now...how many will have homes in in income tax states but keep their little mansions in Cali?....

fwiw....I could care less if people vote to tax themselves....let them have it....

19 posted on 11/07/2012 8:47:21 AM PST by cherry
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Hojczyk
It would generate about $6 billion per year

That'll be the day...

20 posted on 11/07/2012 8:49:02 AM PST by TheDon (In 2012, American voters chose European style big gov't.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-28 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson