Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Moseley

This is stupid argument. COD had millions of dollars thrown at her by Tea Party supporters and made a big name (notorious one) and lost in a cycle that was a wave for the GOP.

This year alas is NOT a GOP wave.

On the contrary, this is another 2000-type close race, and we got punk’d.

I am very disappointed. And if Akin and Mourdock both lose, MORE disappointed, because bascially socialists can win Colorado but conservatives cant win Indiana and Missouri. WTF?!?


12 posted on 11/06/2012 8:22:54 PM PST by WOSG (REPEAL AND REPLACE OBAMA. He stole AmericaÂ’s promise!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: WOSG
On the contrary, this is another 2000-type close race, and we got punk’d.

You got punked by Mitt Romney with his support of Abortion and the Gay Agenda, and his total lack of limited Government credentials.

He was just a piss-poor candidate period.

Given the horrible record of Obama, this would have been a cake-walk for an actual Republican.
13 posted on 11/06/2012 8:27:00 PM PST by SoConPubbie (Mitt and Obama: They're the same poison, just a different potency.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

To: WOSG
This is stupid argument. COD had millions of dollars thrown at her by Tea Party supporters

But so did Mitt Romnney. Mitt Romney had endless amounts of money -- and early on, which O'Donnell did not have.

As of September 14, 2010, Christine O'Donnell had only $20,000 on hand and had run a shoe-string operation throughout the year.

The credit card companies did not release the funds raised after the primary until almost September 30, 2010.

Mitt Romney began a year ago flush with cash and the ability to loan himself as much as he wanted.

Super-PAC's spent hundreds of millions of dollars in support of Mitt Romney.

So I fail to see how this factor supports your view. Mitt Romney had far more money, even adjusting for the scale of the different races, for a year instead of a month, and far more outside money supporting him.

Yet Mitt Romney got the same 40% that Christine O'Donnell got -- in spite of massive attacks, nastiness, in-fighting and some major mis-steps.

In spite of the clear and deliberate sabotage by the NRSC getting Fred Davis into Christine's campaign to make the "witch" ad -- over Christine's objections -- Christine O'Donnell got the same 40% in 2010 as Mitt Romney in Delaware in 2012.

and made a big name (notorious one)

Mitt Romney has a big name, and has had a big name for decades.

and lost in a cycle that was a wave for the GOP

There is no such thing as a "wave" year or cycle. Each State is different.

The "wave" you refer to was Republicans making the 2010 election a referendum on Barack Obama.

In 2010, in Delaware, Barack Obama's approval was 57% -- exactly the same percentage of the vote the Democrat candidate got to fill Vice President Joe Bidens seat.
15 posted on 11/06/2012 8:36:28 PM PST by Moseley (http://www.curesocialism.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson