Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: snarkytart

“Silver got 2008 and 2012. Was he on the money in 2004 as well?”

No, I’m including 2010. The final results for the generic ballot in 2010 was Republicans by +6.8. RealClearPolitics had their final forecast as Republicans +9.4:

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/other/2010_generic_congressional_vote-2171.html

Nate Silver’s model had the final projection as Republicans +6.8....see the 16th paragraph here. He wasn’t even off by a tenth of a percentage point. That’s one hell of a model:

http://fivethirtyeight.blogs.nytimes.com/2010/11/01/agreeing-to-disagree-size-of-republican-wave-hard-to-predict/


32 posted on 11/10/2012 8:11:36 AM PST by jackmercer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: jackmercer

In 2010, Silver gave the GOP only a 25% chance of flipping 60 House seats. It ended up being 67. Some vaunted model...


33 posted on 11/10/2012 9:05:39 AM PST by StAnDeliver (Own It.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

To: jackmercer

Yea but from your link:

“But it tells you basically the same thing. Tonight, our forecast shows Republicans gaining 53 seats.”

We won a dozen more seats than that figure, so while his percentages were correct he low balled our seat gain. Gallup over shot by the same amount. Idk. I wanna see how accurate he is when Obama is not in the race. There’s something odd.


35 posted on 11/10/2012 12:38:32 PM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson