Posted on 11/05/2012 5:52:32 AM PST by barmag25
Edited on 11/05/2012 5:54:29 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]
ANALYSIS: Two days before the election, CBS posted additional portions of a Sept. 12 "60 Minutes" interview where President Obama seems to contradict himself on the Benghazi attack. As the Benghazi investigation gets more attention and focus, CBS is once again adding to the Benghazi timeline.
(Excerpt) Read more at nation.foxnews.com ...
Vote tomorrow as if the lives of our Military Service Men and Women depended upon it - - - .
CBS belatedly “finds” this video like Democrats “find” ballot boxes with 100% Democrat votes when they need them. What a corrupt bunch.
Suspend their broadcast license, shut down all their affiliates, throw the CEO and Board in jail, and start IRS audits on all of their advertisers.
For starters.
This makes me so angry I can hardly stand it. Obama is a traitor. CBS is a traitor. This president and CBS are the enemies of the American people. Pat Caddell was right on the money on this one.
I wonder if Candy Crowley will regret whoring her professional credentials out to the democrat candidate after he has his ass handed to him tomorrow.
ABC is also holding back information
What did CBS know and when did they know it?
I was wondering if Beck was going to mention the media entities withholding info.
Is this the GLENN BECK affect?
Considering the source, It’s not difficult to guess why they edited the tape, but it’s a little puzzling as to why released that specific nugget now, a few days before the election.
That was one of my main motivators in 2008. And will be again this year.
I’ve read the transcript thoroughly and don’t find anything shocking. It’s nothing more than Obama double-speak blather, just the usual verbiage that is purposefully unclear.
What he said to CBS, or to anyone else for that matter, is less important than what happened, or didn’t happen at his direction, on the ground. For that, he needs to be prosecuted.
The state controlled MSM’s actions during this campaign have been a disgrace. This country doesn’t have a national media anymore. It’s nothing but a DNC propaganda machine.
It’s probably the least significant of all the sick and disgusting things involved in this whole sordid affair, but it still turns my stomach to hear the President of the United States of America repeatedly refer to the terrorists who killed our Ambassador and three American heroes as “folks”.
Here is another one: Should BENGHAZI-COWARD Obama resign now, or wait until November 7 th to resign as a Revenge-filled, Lame-Duck failure?
I think that the Republicans should see what CBS’ price is. I think the Democrats spend a few bucks to bribe journalists and they get daily positive political ads touted as news. It can’t be that much money to buy these journalists.
During the Bush administration, the msm was under the control of the democratic party...hasn’t changed.
What did CBS know and when did they know it?
There are many employees of both of these state-run media whores who know these facts. Where are the whistleblowers?! Is there a single patriotic American within any of these cesspools?
Jake Tapper? Sharyl Attkisson? You both know if this happened during a GOP administration, this story would be running 24/7 on your respective networks, with demands for answers and resignations!
It depends on what the meaning of the word “is” is, or, in this case, what the meaning of the phrase “act of terror” is.
Obama is trying to have it both ways.
When attributing the attack to a video, Obama defines “act of terror” generically as anything that is violent, in this case performed by an angry mob of the general Libyan population.
When arguing that he correctly labeled the attack on the day after in the Rose Garden, Obama defines “act of terror” as a “terrorist act” performed by radical terrorists.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.