Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, the Virtual Challenger
National Review ^ | 11/5/2012 | Victor Davis Hanson

Posted on 11/05/2012 5:22:15 AM PST by Servant of the Cross

Making no attempt to defend his record, he talks of what he “would” do in a second term.

In these last days of the race, Obama counts on the news of Sandy turning attention away from Romney’s October momentum, to photo-ops of himself in a monogrammed bomber jacket trying to look presidential. The more Benghazi creeps into the news, the stranger the silence from the Obama administration. But the real story is that almost all of the hope of 2008 has ended in the fear and loathing of 2012.

Obama has made no real attempt to defend much of what he has done in the last four years. It is as if his first term never existed — no 70 percent approval rating, no Democratic House, no Democratic Senate. Instead we are back to the future as a young Lincolnesque senator, with a clean slate, has come to save us from George W. Bush’s recession, which, we now learn, was caused by plutocrat Mitt Romney all along. Obama is the perpetual challenger, once more running against Bobby Rush, Alan Keyes, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain on all the wonderful things he would do if only he were elected.

On energy, suddenly the president has dropped all mention of “wind, solar, and 5 million new green jobs.” Under the radar, he may be pursuing cap-and-trade and shutting down coal plants by executive orders, but officially Obama is bragging that the oil and gas industry ignored him, drilled like crazy on private lands, and — in spite of him, not because of him — have vastly upped U.S. fossil-fuel production. And suddenly that is a good thing. His new energy message seems to have been reduced to something like, “Vote for me, because I failed to stop private energy companies, and so we are much better off.” It is as if cap-and-trade, the Chevy Volt, and Solyndra never existed.

There is the same disconnect on the economy. The recent dismal jobs report fell on deaf ears. The media do not care that the unemployment rate is worse now — after over $5 trillion borrowed and wasted — than when Obama took office four years ago. Old Democratic slogans like “It’s the economy, stupid,” and “jobless recovery” apply only when the GDP growth rate is over 3 percent, not hovering closer to 1 percent, and when unemployment is well below 6 percent, not nearly 8 percent. There is not much defense of Obamacare, or the stimulus — whose expenditures to this day cannot be defined, much less defended. Van Jones and “green jobs” are ancient history. Food-stamp statistics, new disability filings, and plunging per capita income are irrelevant and supposedly just right-wing talking points.

Instead, Obama is running as the challenger, using the hypothetical “I would” or the future-tense “I will” — as if it is Romney who has a record of failed presidential leadership. In short, Obama’s economic message is that we can reduce our defense budget — given sudden world tranquillity — and, at last, nation-build in America through radically new ideas of spending trillions of dollars in borrowed money.

The Obama notion on race, promulgated always by surrogates, is that a pro-Obama good 2008 vote proved that America in theory might not be racist, but a bad 2012 vote would confirm that it still is. No mention was ever made that Obama received more white votes than had any Democratic presidential candidate since Jimmy Carter. So the Reverend Joseph Lowery — who, with the exit of the president’s old pastor, the Reverend Jeremiah Wright, gave the benediction at Barack Obama’s inauguration in 2009 with soaring platitudes of racial healing and in turn received the Medal of Freedom from him — just announced, “I don’t know what kind of a n—– wouldn’t vote with a black man running.” He then went on to declare that he once again believed, as he had insisted as a youth, that white people were “going to Hell.” When criticized, the Medal of Freedom winner said this was meant as a joke, but one may question how appropriate such a joke is in this new age of racial healing.

Jesse Jackson has likewise dropped all the pretense of his rainbow coalition. This last week he branded tea-partiers as racists of a “Fort Sumter Tea Party” who wished to “overthrow our government, engage in secession, sedition, segregation, and slavery.” This is reminiscent of Joe Biden’s “put y’all back in chains.” These are the logical wages of four years of Skip Gates editorializing, “punish our enemies,” the son who would have looked like Trayvon Martin, a nation of “cowards,” and “my people.”

As far as foreign affairs go, there are no longer any boasts about the Middle East and the Arab Spring, no longer any leaks about a possible Syrian “humanitarian” intervention. We hear nothing of a soon-to-be-nuclear Iran — other than a desperate eleventh-hour Iranian attempt to affect the election by false promises to reduce enrichment, a measure that the theocracy scoffed at for four years. The world’s rogues — Putin, Chávez, Castro — have weighed in on the election, in the manner that school bullies each day smile at the freshman with pockets full of change.

U.S. foreign policy has been reduced to one boast, “I killed Osama bin Laden, and that is all ye need to know.” As in the case of Watergate, Benghazi and the murder of an ambassador and three other Americans will be in the news after the election, given that even the Obama White House and a toadyish media cannot suppress a lie of this magnitude. But for now Obama makes no effort to defend his reset foreign policy; it just exists as a sort of nothingness.

The same is true of the new civility. If Obama should win, he will, after the election, return to his sermons about negative advertising and promulgate his fables on bipartisanship. But for now, the crudity continues: Romney is a bullsh**ter. Take “revenge” by voting against Romney — reminding us that “get in their face” and “bring a gun to a knife fight” were characteristic, not aberrant. A gross ad is aired, comparing a vote for Obama with one’s first attempt at sexual intercourse. Child choruses sing of Romney the villain, the polluter, the monster. David Axelrod says that for the middle class, Paul Ryan’s proposed budget is “like a choice between a punch to the nose and a knee to the groin.” In an ad produced by Michael Moore, nursing-home dwellers talk of burning down America and punching Mitt Romney in the groin, replete with the usual four-letter words. Obama is supposedly oblivious to all this, as he counts on its stirring up his base. Indeed, no doubt he has already written his victory speech for November 7 — “It’s time to stop this negative infighting. There is no red, no blue America.” Blah, blah, blah . . .

What then is Obama’s strategy in this campaign — other than retention of the perks and power of office — given that he runs on hypotheticals as a virtual challenger? In fact, there are just two implicit themes: First, America is a different country now, and “they” (fill in the blanks — backward white people, privileged males, wealthy people, business people, misogynists, racists, xenophobes, homophobes, etc.) will put you into figurative chains without Obama to stop them. So we have Washington Post columnist Colbert King warning that Mitt Romney is the new Andrew Johnson, who, following a Christ-like Lincoln-Obama figure, would once again turn over the country to the states-rights racists. Of course, Mr. King keeps mum on the recent Joseph Lowery racist diatribes and Jesse Jackson invective. We are living in the age of a new brooding, petulant Nixon, who seeks power by talking of unity while constantly creating fissures of disunity.

Second, all the vast increases in disability insurance, unemployment insurance, and food stamps, the “free” health care, the government takeovers of money-losing companies, and the borrowed stimulus for state pensions and benefits — all that is preferable to a jobs-creating, free-market prosperous economy that enriches too few and empowers too many. In contrast, the new dependency can continue and expand only under Obama, who has the courage to make “them” (see above) pay their fair share for it.

Those messages are the gist of the Obama campaign — as if $5 trillion in new debt, Benghazi, permanently high unemployment, and an EU economy in America simply never existed.


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: candidate; challenger; obama; virtual
The amateur believes his own lies. He's trapped in his little bubble of liberal fantasy. Reality never existed.
1 posted on 11/05/2012 5:22:19 AM PST by Servant of the Cross
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

ras 49-48


2 posted on 11/05/2012 5:26:50 AM PST by Paul8148
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb; randita; Rummyfan; Cincinatus' Wife; neverdem; drewh; Kaslin; Sir Napsalot; SeekAndFind; ...
VDH ping. A devastating analysis of the poseur.

"Obama has made no real attempt to defend much of what he has done in the last four years. It is as if his first term never existed - Obama is the perpetual challenger, once more running against Bobby Rush, Alan Keyes, Hillary Clinton, and John McCain on all the wonderful things he would do if only he were elected."

3 posted on 11/05/2012 5:27:59 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

This is exactly what I don’t understand. He’s running on a “Forward” theme, just like the “Hopey-Changie” theme last time, but this time he has a record which by any measure is abysmal. I don’t understand why Romney isn’t making a more direct, in-your-face, attack on the man’s record. Romney needs to have an ad that simply says he said the same things four years ago and everything is worse, but do it more forcefully than is currently being done.


4 posted on 11/05/2012 5:30:02 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148

Really? Good news.


5 posted on 11/05/2012 5:30:27 AM PST by WashingtonSource
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Paul8148
That is based on projected voter turnout to be comparable to 2008 rather than 2010. I'm betting on 2010 turnout with the R's being at worst equal to D's.

The "enthusisam gap" is enormous. R's will crawl over glass to serve an eviction notice to this anti-American Occupy_WH crowd.

6 posted on 11/05/2012 5:32:22 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: econjack
He’s running on a “Forward” theme ... sa[ying] the same things four years ago and everything is worse ...


7 posted on 11/05/2012 5:40:56 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

First, America is a different country now, and “they” (fill in the blanks — backward white people, privileged males, wealthy people, business people, misogynists, racists, xenophobes, homophobes, etc.) will put you into figurative chains without Obama to stop them.


This hit me pretty hard, because the way I look at it. These are the very people he, his cronies and “Peeps” want to see put into chains so as to slave away and keep them in comfort and plenty.


8 posted on 11/05/2012 5:49:13 AM PST by The Working Man
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross
Obama-wanting-a-second-term is running against the Obama-of-his-first-term.

Much of Obama’s speechifying and rhetoric is from dusted off speeches of 2008. If one didn't know different, they would think Candidate Obama is running against the Incumbent-in-the-White-House.

The trouble is, most of what 2008 Obama ran against and blamed on Bush2, Incumbent Obama did and did even worse.

Incumbent Obama in 4 years outspent Bush's 8 years. Incumbent Obama has increased poverty, put more people on food stamps, caused more people to lose their jobs [unemployment is higher today than when Obama took office], lost $billions in green energy companies, stole over $700 billion from Medicare to pay for part of Obamacare, etc.

Campaign 2012 Obama is running against Incumbent 2008 Obama. He is losing and wants revenge against Romney, binders, and Big Bird. Obama has to blame someone or something; that is his history, his behavioral pattern.

If Campaign 2012 Obama would open his eyes and see what major mess the next president is going to inherit from Incumbent 2008 Obama, Campaign 2012 Obama take off for Hawaii even before the election.

9 posted on 11/05/2012 5:51:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Good ones!!


10 posted on 11/05/2012 5:54:32 AM PST by econjack (Some people are as dumb as soup.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy
Obama-wanting-a-second-term is running against the Obama-of-his-first-term.

The middle class has been "buried these last four years" … but I always say what I mean!

11 posted on 11/05/2012 6:02:19 AM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

He is surronded by an inner circle of yes men. No one, outside of the conservative media, will disturb his illusions.


12 posted on 11/05/2012 6:06:57 AM PST by The_Media_never_lie (Actually, they lie when it suits them! The crooked MS media must be defeated any way it can be done!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

BTTT!


13 posted on 11/06/2012 1:46:09 AM PST by neverdem ( Xin loi min oi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Servant of the Cross

Speaking of “lies” wasn’t the Clinton speech HILARIOUS??!!


14 posted on 11/06/2012 12:49:14 PM PST by Deb (If you wanna laugh everyday, follow Deepak Chopra on Twitter)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Deb; ken5050
Speaking of “lies” wasn’t the Clinton speech HILARIOUS??!!

But I want to say one thing to the American people ... I want you to listen to me ... I'm gonna say this again ... I DID NOT HAVE SEXUAL RELATIONS WITH THAT WOMAN (!)

Bill? Bill?!! What in the hell is this dress doing in our closet?!

15 posted on 11/06/2012 1:37:50 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Deb
Yea, just freaking hilarious. Infuriating more like it. There was NO ONE in the press who called him on it?!

BJ "The Liar" Clintoon: Who Wants A President Who Will Lie To You?

One more sign that the end of the world is near.

16 posted on 11/06/2012 1:43:53 PM PST by Servant of the Cross (the Truth will set you free)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson