Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MacMattico
It is because it is infact tied. Just like the 2000 election, it is going to be a nail-biter.

All this talk of 300+ EVs is unjustified. I hope I am wrong and Romney loses, but I trust the aggregation of polls more than I trust Dick Morris' prognostications.

13 posted on 11/05/2012 1:04:09 AM PST by nwrep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: nwrep

This is a solid Romney win:

(1) “Undecideds break for the challenger”—every election, no exceptions. They know the incumbent and don’t like them.

(2) On Wisconsin—the pollsters called that recall election “too close to call” in their most recent test of polling “technology”. They failed again. RR will win Wisconsin by Walker-like margins.

(3) and Ohio and maybe PA. Blue collar white males hate pollsters and won’t tell them the truth.


16 posted on 11/05/2012 1:31:52 AM PST by cgbg (Crying MSNBC lefties on election night=Victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

To: nwrep
"I hope I am wrong and Romney loses, but I trust the aggregation of polls more than I trust Dick Morris' prognostications."

Nothing worse than the aggregation of dated polls with variously flawed methodologies.

Let me school you.

Indiana was won by Obama in 2008, but it was excluded from all swing-state polling this year. Why? Because including Indiana would have kept the early swing-state polling within MoE. And that didn't fit the MSM narrative.

Very telling Freudian slip btw.

38 posted on 11/05/2012 5:16:45 AM PST by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson