Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

USS Enterprise ends last voyage
Politico ^

Posted on 11/04/2012 2:24:57 PM PST by Sub-Driver

USS Enterprise ends last voyage By: Associated Press November 4, 2012 03:20 PM EST

The world’s first nuclear-powered aircraft carrier ended its remarkable career at sea on Sunday when it pulled into its home port for the final time after participating in every major conflict since the Cuban Missile Crisis of 1962.

The USS Enterprise began shutting down its eight nuclear reactors almost as soon as it arrived at its pier at Naval Station Norfolk in Virginia, where thousands of cheering family members and friends welcomed the ship home from its 25th and final deployment after nearly eight months at sea. The ship will never move on its own power again and will eventually be scrapped in Washington state, making its final voyage a sentimental one for those who have sailed aboard “The Big E.”

Copies of the ship’s daily newspaper, “The Shuttle,” were in short supply as sailors looked for memorabilia to take with them. Countless personal photos were taken by sailors throughout the ship as it approached shore.

“It’s exceptionally emotional and exceptionally satisfying,” Rear Adm. Ted Carter, commander of the Enterprise Strike Group, said as Naval Station Norfolk came into view and his sailors manned the rails.

However, Carter is the first to say that the Enterprise’s final deployment was anything but a sentimental victory lap. The ships’ fighter planes flew more than 2,200 combat sorties and dropped 56 bombs in Afghanistan while supporting U.S. and international ground troops. In a show of force to Iran, the ship also passed through the strategic Strait of Hormuz 10 times, a figure that Carter said is more than double the typical amount.

(Excerpt) Read more at politico.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last
To: epow
CVN-78 Gerald R. Ford and CVN-79 John F. Kennedy (WTF???) are currently under construction with acceptance into the fleet scheduled for 2015 and 2020 respectively. CVN-77 George H. W. Bush was accepted into the fleet in 2009.

Our carrier fleet currently consists of the 10 ships of the "Nimitz" class. Gerald Ford will begin a new class.

CVN-65 Enterprise was one-of-a-kind; a spectacularly successful experiment.

21 posted on 11/04/2012 3:40:38 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: epow

“...has happened to America and it’s electorate that has brought us to this shameful point in our history...”

Free Stuff!


22 posted on 11/04/2012 3:41:43 PM PST by Carriage Hill ("0bummer's a towering figure" - even a Garden Gnome casts a long shadow at sunset.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
Speaking of the CVN-21 supercarrier program, I found this blurb on wikipedia:

*************

There are expected to be ten ships of this class.[16] To date, three have been announced:
Gerald R. Ford (CVN-78) (2015): scheduled to replace Enterprise (CVN-65).
John F. Kennedy (CVN-79)[1] (2020): scheduled to replace Nimitz (CVN-68).
CVN-80 (2025): scheduled to replace Dwight D. Eisenhower (CVN-69).

The United States Navy's Public Affairs Office has requested input from the American public as to what the remaining eight ships in the class should be named. Anecdotal reports from naval officers indicate that the public favors naming the new CVN-21s after famous Navy warships of the past, mainly those of the Revolutionary War era and the famous carriers of World War II. Reportedly, Enterprise is the most favored name, followed by Saratoga, Lexington, Hornet, Wasp, and Guadalcanal. The reports also seem to indicate that the public does not want more carriers named after politicians or Presidents.[citation needed]

*********

Hope this is accurate info and that the Navy pays heed to it.

23 posted on 11/04/2012 3:45:17 PM PST by Charles Martel (Endeavor to persevere...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
spend naval funds on constructing newer Ford-class carriers.
24 posted on 11/04/2012 3:47:52 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
spend naval funds on constructing newer Ford-class carriers.

IMO, we need to pick up the pace a bit on getting the Fords to the fleet. Having only 10 carriers requires spreading fleet assets a bit too thinly.

25 posted on 11/04/2012 3:48:39 PM PST by ArrogantBustard (Western Civilization is Aborting, Buggering, and Contracepting itself out of existence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile
As sad as it may be, better to decommission her and spend naval funds on constructing newer Ford-class carriers.

The next one, hopefully, christened Enterprise...

26 posted on 11/04/2012 3:53:58 PM PST by okie01 (THE MAINSTREAM MEDIA; Ignorance on parade.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

I had the honor of serving on the Enterprise 1983-1986, Weapons Dept, W Division. My first ship after bootcamp.


27 posted on 11/04/2012 3:54:17 PM PST by aomagrat (Gun owners who vote for democrats are too stupid to own guns.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JerseyanExile

good point

I guess a complete overhaul probably costs more than building a new one


28 posted on 11/04/2012 3:55:30 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: GeronL
I guess a complete overhaul probably costs more than building a new one

When CVN-78 was delayed by a few years the USN did a feasibility study into overhauling the Enterprise to fill in the gap (the Navy carrier fleet is set by law at 11 decks, with Enterprise leaving it'll temporarily drop to 10 until Ford is commissioned). They determined that it would cost $3 billion (which would include a refueling, which she would need) and allow her to conduct two more deployments.

Not cost effective. Unfortunately preserving her as a museum wouldn't be cost-effective either. Once she's defueled at Newport News (it'll take 3-4 years to do that) she'll be towed around South America and up to Puget Sound for scrapping. Since there won't be much in the way of hiding it, it's going to be painful to watch her get cut up in slow motion (that part will take at least another 4 years).

Hopefully some critical parts of her will be saved. Key amongst these are the five portholes in her bow auxiliary conning station and three in the CO's in-port cabin that came from the previous Enterprise (CV-6). Those NEED to find good homes somewhere, preferably in the next Enterprise. After that it's been speculated that her unique island could be removed and preserved. It would possibly seem like a weird decapitation ... but it's the most recognizable feature of the ship.
29 posted on 11/04/2012 4:09:11 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: tanknetter

bump

You are correct. Although if that island could become a house somewhere, it’d be pretty cool. lol.


30 posted on 11/04/2012 4:15:44 PM PST by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel
Reportedly, Enterprise is the most favored name, followed by Saratoga, Lexington, Hornet, Wasp, and Guadalcanal.

Wasp is already hanging on an LHD (although one that will retire long before the final ship of the Ford class is commissioned), and Guadalcanal is more befitting of an America-class LHA.

My preference, in order, would be Enterprise, Lexington, Yorktown, Ranger, Hornet, Saratoga, Bunker Hill (for after CG-54 retires) and Intrepid. With possible substitutions of Essex, Wasp, BonHomme Richard and Midway and Coral Sea (the first three to follow the decommissioning of the LHDs currently bearing the names)

Now here's the part that really puts it all into perspective. The 10-ship Ford Class are intended to replace the Enterprise and the first nine Nimitzes (so the final Ford will replace the USS Ronald Reagan). At a build rate of one every five years and a 50-year lifespan that means the final Ford commissions in 2060 and will retire in ... 2110. 98 years from now. Of course when that happens there will probably be a flyover by flight of USAF B-52s ...
31 posted on 11/04/2012 4:21:16 PM PST by tanknetter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

———Although if that island could become a house somewhere-——

It would be a super cool exhibit at the Museum Of Naval Aviation in Pensacola.

May be the Enterprise Auto rental guy can save it too.

His company is named for the Enterprise and he built a major exhibit hall down there.


32 posted on 11/04/2012 4:32:29 PM PST by bert ((K.E. N.P. N.C. +12 ..... Present failure and impending death yield irrational action))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: aomagrat

My squadron deployed on the Enterprise during the same period of time. We probably saw each other on the mess deck at least a couple times. Course, most black shoes didn’t care to fraternize with air wing <-:


33 posted on 11/04/2012 4:38:13 PM PST by mr_griz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
USS Enterprise the world's first nuclear powered Aircraft Carrier.



34 posted on 11/04/2012 5:04:07 PM PST by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver

No more famous name in the US Navy than Enterprise. Especially the WW2 Enterprise. Fought in virtually every naval battle in the Pacific. A hero ship America should never forget its name. I can’t believe how stupid it was to make her into razor blades, should it have survived it would be the foremost WW2 attraction. It would be a crying shame for this retiring nuke Carrier to be the last to carry that illustrious name.


35 posted on 11/04/2012 5:55:19 PM PST by sasportas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Charles Martel

I want to see another Enterprise. And a Yorktown...Intrepid, you get the idea.

I am sick of having our ships named after politicians, at least carriers.


36 posted on 11/04/2012 6:28:28 PM PST by rlmorel (1793 French Jacobins and 2012 American Liberals have a lot in common.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003

You’re welcome but honest...I had it SO easy compared to the kids who serve today. I didn’t have to deal with the PC BS, didn’t have to go to war with ROEs that put me at risk, didn’t have to deal with half the crap the kids do today.
The troopers today are REAL heroes...God bless them....


37 posted on 11/04/2012 7:14:56 PM PST by matginzac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Sub-Driver
The Enterprise was a great ship from the days when even liberals respected great Americans. Today?


38 posted on 11/05/2012 12:32:53 AM PST by Pollster1 (Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. - Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-38 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson