Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Exclusive: Security officials on the ground in Libya challenge CIA account
Fox News ^ | 11/3/12 | Adam Housley Jennifer Griffin

Posted on 11/03/2012 10:02:40 AM PDT by mgist

As details emerge of serious security issues before the attack on Sept. 11, Fox News is also beginning to hear more frustration from sources both on the ground in Benghazi and in the U.S. Multiple British and American sources insist there were other capabilities in the region and are mystified why none were used. Fox News was told there were not only armed drones that monitor Libyan chemical weapon sites in the area, but also F-18's, AC-130 aircraft and even helicopters that could have been dispatched in a timely fashion.

British intelligence sources said that unarmed drones routinely flew over Benghazi every night in flight patterns and that armed drones which fly over chemical sites, some a short flight from Benghazi, "were always said to be on call." American sources confirmed this and questioned "why was a drone armed only with a camera dispatched?"

Another source added, "Why would they put a ragtag team together in Tripoli as first responders? This is not even what they do for a living. We had a first responder air base in Italy almost the same distance away." Despite the team arriving from Tripoli that night, sources said sufficient American back-up never came.

British sources on the ground in Benghazi said they are extremely frustrated by the attack and are still wondering why they weren't called for help. “We have more people on the ground here than the Americans and I just don't know why we didn't get the call?" one said.

(Excerpt) Read more at foxnews.com ...


TOPICS: Government; United Kingdom
KEYWORDS: benghazi; bhocia; cia; clintontreason; intelligence; kenyanbornmuzzie; libya; obamatheliar; obamatreason; soshillary; treason; waronterror

1 posted on 11/03/2012 10:02:42 AM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: mgist

Every American on the Tripoli QRF was TECHNICALLY a civilian. Obama appears to want some tiny claim to having sent “armed help” but wanted to thread the needle by keeping that help NON military.


2 posted on 11/03/2012 10:09:04 AM PDT by gaijin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Looking more and more like an obama planned kidnapping gone bad. Without a doubt zer0 would do what he has to do to help moslems against Americans.
3 posted on 11/03/2012 10:09:29 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
The Brits and Americans on the ground all have more to say and are holding back for some reason. Or maybe they have said it and those reporting are holding back. What do do know in damning for this administration. What we don't know yet is probably treasonous.
4 posted on 11/03/2012 10:11:54 AM PDT by elpadre (AfganistaMr Obama said the goal was to "disrupt, dismantle and defeat al-hereQaeda" and its allies.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Here are a few reasons hat come to mind:

1. He cannot think without a teleprompter
2. He doesn’t care that much about the rest of us outside his “click”.
3. He didn’t want to acknowledge the presence of al Quaeda since he’d already supposedly decimated them.
4. He needed to get some beauty rest...after all, since he thinks he is “eye candy” to the rest of us, then he must look good for Las Vegas and Jay-Z.
5. He’s just not that into regular Americans
6. He didn’t want to interfere with the hostage-taking situation...he needed a trade for the blind sheik
7. What is the loss of a few more Navy SEALS, anyway?
8. He is so out of touch with what our military CAN do that he could not see a way to bring a success out of it.
9. This was not supposed to happen to him, on his watch.
10. He expected a different outcome, didn’t see the seriousness of it.
11. He just doesn’t care. PERIOD!
6.


5 posted on 11/03/2012 10:13:42 AM PDT by Shery (in APO Land)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Let's be really, really real. We should not have gone after Kaddafhi in the first place AND IT WAS AN ASSASSINATION.

It was a civil war...but Kaddafhi did have control over the nasty, crazy Muslims.

The Brits and France should have just gotten their oil elsewhere. It's not like Canada couldn't dole some out.

6 posted on 11/03/2012 10:15:11 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

I take is it was a kidnapping gone bad—They were to take the ambassador with little loss of life. Obama would make an appeal or fly to Libya and get his release. This would show him as a leader and a respected American. Then, he would (after the election) release the Blind Sheikh—for humanitarian reasons to the Muslim Brotherhood. The fly in the ointment was the two Seals who came in out of the blue and shot so many terrorists (some say 60) that in anger, they killed or beat up the ambassador so badly —he died. Bruce Willis should do this as a “Die Hard” film. Those two were true patriots—and they may well have unseated Obama’s bid for power—for that alone they should be honored. Don’t worry all the paper trail has been shredded—but I don’t think Hillary will go to prison to cover his tail.


7 posted on 11/03/2012 10:17:12 AM PDT by Forward the Light Brigade (Into the Jaws of H*ll)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Omoslem didn’t allow AC130 air support because he didn’t want Americans to realize he armed al Qaeda with MANPADS such as SA-7’s.

There’s supposedly 20,000 shoulder launched antiaircraft missiles SOMEWHERE that used to belong to Gaddafi.

CIA was rumored to be in Libya tracking them down. But since Omoslem runs the show, the truth is more like “Shipping those missiles to Moslem Brotherhood in Syria via Turkey.”

Can you imagine the s**tshow if USA air support arrived over Benghazi and suddenly al Qaeda launches hundreds of missiles provided by Obamatollah?


8 posted on 11/03/2012 10:21:26 AM PDT by LyinLibs (If victims of islam were more "islamophobic," maybe they'd still be alive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist
Obama can't make decisions. That's his major flaw.

His other flaws include....being a Muslim, lying, stealing, conniving, murder,

9 posted on 11/03/2012 10:22:43 AM PDT by Sacajaweau (r)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Full Agreement FRiend.


10 posted on 11/03/2012 10:24:04 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: mgist; Travis McGee; sickoflibs
General Petraeus's starting to look compromised.

Last week a google search show the same old same old - today's search on Gerneral Petraeus shows him tied to Mitt Romney. ( an old VP possible pick) That's new and it's telling. Obama's going to stick the CIA and Petraeus with this mess - - and my guess is the New York Times And Washington Post will buy the story.

The truth - the real truth - might not come out until after the election. Petraeus needs to put his concern about publicly appearing to 'follow the rules' and come clean. It's his bet shot.

11 posted on 11/03/2012 10:28:06 AM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LyinLibs
hundreds

You don't know US very well. Less than three is best estimate, if they could get off that many before yes ... they would be gone, gone, gone.

12 posted on 11/03/2012 10:28:30 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mgist

Read the story by WND in the article here on Free Republic. It was Soros. He was the one pulling the strings and using high-sounding ideas to make money off the wars in the Middle East. There needs to be a tribunal. These are Crimes Against Humanity...and for money.


13 posted on 11/03/2012 10:29:53 AM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals
An 0bama plot to have Stevens kidnapped so 0bama could 'rescue' him shortly before the election is highly probable. Drawing down security at the Embassy BEFORE the attack is a huge red flag; As few players as possible, the better. 0bama set-out to protect the 'kidnapping crew' from the start. This is probably why he didn't want our military involved. The other red flag is, Why would Stevens even be at that location on the most memorialized day in American history (9/11)? A kidnapping on 9/11 would be done for maximum impact with the American people.

What took so long for the FBI to get to the Embassy? Why was Stevens' correspondence STILL at the scene, found by a Dubai media crew on Oct. 26? Was the FBI even there? Seems like the 0bama regime didn't really want this investigated!

This event lasted for hours.. Where was Stevens throughout this attack? He was unaccounted for, for a long time.. Was he taken someplace before being taken to the hospital? Why couldn't the SEALs locate Stevens in the embassy then later he was removed from the embassy by the locals/terrorists? Did terrorists take him to the hospital? Why would they do that? Who was guarding the hospital while Stevens was inside, the 'kidnappers' who wanted their captor back ALIVE?

14 posted on 11/03/2012 10:37:54 AM PDT by Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Obama_Is_Sabotaging_America
Excellent questions, FRiend. Full Agreement!
15 posted on 11/03/2012 10:42:11 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: elpadre
What we don't know yet is probably treasonous.

Well, everything we do know so far is also. Left classified documents to the enemy, supplied arms to the enemy, watched the enemy kill Americans without help, aiding and abetting the enemy with all the above........

16 posted on 11/03/2012 10:45:13 AM PDT by BerryDingle (I know how to deal with communists, I still wear their scars on my back from Hollywood-Ronald Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Hussein’s not smart enough to plan this so the question is who was really behind it. Jarrett, maybe. Hillary, probably not. Some other Soros’ minion?


17 posted on 11/03/2012 10:49:45 AM PDT by bgill (Evil doers are in every corner of our government. Have we passed the point of no return?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: no-to-illegals

Huma, maybe.


18 posted on 11/03/2012 10:50:36 AM PDT by bgill (Evil doers are in every corner of our government. Have we passed the point of no return?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: bgill

I would be shocked if she were not a player in this mess.


19 posted on 11/03/2012 10:56:25 AM PDT by Josephat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: bgill
possible, possibles. zer0 would have to approve though. Have no doubt he would.
20 posted on 11/03/2012 10:58:57 AM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: mgist

When the facts are allowed to come out Lameduck Obama is not only going to leave office, he is going to leave in disgrace.


21 posted on 11/03/2012 11:43:01 AM PDT by fortheDeclaration (Pr 14:34 Righteousness exalteth a nation:but sin is a reproach to any people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mgist

We need Mossad, British special forces, anti NATO, or any other source on the ground in Libya to help us sort this out before the election. There is no faith in Washington to resolve this. Our military (heroes) are loyal and will jeopardize their careers by talking. ANY source(s) who talk on or after Nov. 7th should be considered cowards.


22 posted on 11/03/2012 12:34:50 PM PDT by Maggie34
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Maggie34

The evidence is probably LONG GONE


23 posted on 11/03/2012 12:36:37 PM PDT by GeronL (http://asspos.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: mgist

There was a reason the Obama Administration wouldn’t let the FBI go to Benghazi after this mess...

There’s also a reason google searches of the term “ General Petraeus’ made earlier today linked him with Romney. That’s changed... in the last hour or so...


24 posted on 11/03/2012 12:38:54 PM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Forward the Light Brigade

Sorry, the whole kidnapping scenario makes no sense. Letting your ambassador be kidnapped - weak. The President of the US begging a bunch of guerillas for the ambassador’s release - weak. Releasing the blind terrorist for the ambassador - weak, weak, weak.

What would actually have made Obama look good is backing up the two SEALs who raced to the rescue and giving them a hero’s welcome home - basking in their glory, lapped in the mantle of their courage and victory.

IMO, Obama just cared more about not making the Libyan government that he installed look weak, than he did about saving the lives of Americans - and not just any Americans but the Ambassador and his staff and the brave, brave men who defended them.


25 posted on 11/03/2012 12:42:57 PM PDT by heartwood
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

He wasn’t going to beg for his release, he was going to trade the blind sheik (9/11 organizer) for the ambasador. Play the hero and have an excuse to release the blind sheik. obama had already been in discussions to release him, when too many people started complaining.


26 posted on 11/03/2012 1:26:47 PM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: heartwood

This came out soon after 9/11. So far nothing contradicts this theory, and since we dont know the truth. http://m.youtube.com/watch?v=-jrEc7bTy4E


27 posted on 11/03/2012 1:28:47 PM PDT by mgist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: mgist; All
Judge Jeanine Pirro Nov. 3, 2012 with Retired Army Colonel David Hunt and Former CIA operative Mike Baker
28 posted on 11/04/2012 12:46:06 PM PST by Larousse2 (The price of Freedom is Eternal Vigilance. ~ Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson