Skip to comments.Flooded by Keynesianism
Posted on 11/03/2012 7:23:05 AM PDT by Kaslin
Hurricane Sandy was an invader, one that splashed ashore with as much destructive power as any foreign (or perhaps interstellar) invader could hope to bring to bear against our coasts. Thus, in the opinion of economist Paul Krugman, the storm should help boost the American economy.
If we discovered that, you know, space aliens were planning to attack and we needed a massive buildup to counter the space alien threat and really inflation and budget deficits took secondary place to that, this slump would be over in 18 months, the Nobel Prize winning economist declared on CNN in 2011. And then if we discovered, oops, we made a mistake, there arent any aliens, wed be better [off].
Krugmans managed to sum up Keynesian economics in 30 seconds. This theory holds that massive amounts of government spending -- even on something unnecessary, such as a program to protect against Space Invaders -- can boost the economy. Speaking again of invaders, Krugman added at a conference this summer: we could get something that could cause the government to say, Oh, never mind those budget things; lets just spend and do a bunch of stuff.
Well, Hurricane Sandy swamped cities, killed dozens, left millions without electricity and could cost $20 billion. Rest assured that estimate will only climb. To an economist such as Krugman, that must sound like great news. All those repairs and rebuilding jobs will force American companies to stop hoarding cash, which theyve been selfishly doing.
Today, American companies have nearly $2 trillion sitting on their balance sheets, Barack Obama told the Chamber of Commerce last year. And I know that many of you have told me that youre waiting for demand to rise before you get off the sidelines and expand, and that with millions of Americans out of work, demand has risen more slowly than any of us would like. Were in this together, but many of your own economists and salespeople are now forecasting a healthy increase in demand.
Well, weather forecasters were correct that Sandy would be destructive. But the economists Obama cited have been off base thus far; companies are waiting to see what may happen in 2013 before theyll agree to ramp up investment. For example, a host of expensive new regulations may well be on the way.
Meanwhile, when considering whether Sandys destruction will end up boosting the economy, consider the broken window fallacy explained by economist Frederic Bestiat way back in 1848 (now thats a forecast!). He explains that, while the money used to repair a broken item benefits the person making the repair, the rest of us lose out because that money isnt available to purchase new products.
Society loses the value of objects unnecessarily destroyed, Bestiat noted. To break, to destroy, to dissipate is not to encourage national employment.
In modern terms, consider what Bestiat calls seen effects: there are people who will get a new house or a new car as a result of Sandy. But that house or car merely replaces one that, less than a week ago, was perfectly serviceable.
Meanwhile, the family that lived in the destroyed house or relied on the car to get to work is being forced to live out of suitcases, spending time with relatives or paying for a hotel or apartment. And theyre not able to get around without a car. These are among the not seen effects that Bestiat warned about.
Then theres the loss of productivity, another hidden cost of the storm. Businesses up and down the east coast were shuttered by the storm. The New York subway system was swamped. Even if their buildings werent damaged, companies will never get those work days back. There were deals left undone, products left unproduced, and food spoiled by the loss of power.
Then, of course, some businesses were literally washed away. Those owners may well decide not to rebuild at all. That imposes a not seen cost for their employees and suppliers that wont be known for months or even years.
Destruction is not profitable, Bestiat wrote a century and a half ago. Its a big reason Keynesian economics doesnt work, and a lesson well be re-learning as the massive bills from Hurricane Sandy come due.
Blow up a dam!
Broken windows, inefficient wind turbines, bridges to nowhere are all part of the same Keynesian Ponzi scheme - which is essentially redistributive, inflationary and destructive of productivity and standards of living. What is needed is a self-sustaining shift in the demand curve, equivalent to the communications/computing shift of the 90s. Cheap (relatively, that is) gas energy could just do it.
Krugman slept through the lecture on opportunity cost.
Krugman’s solution is exactly how Hitler got Germany out of the depression. Trouble is that you then have to put that military capital to work and earn an ROI. You have to invade someone and take their stuff else it becomes a big rusting boat anchor dragging you down to Davy Jones’ locker.
Credentialed fools like him should be locked up. They are an imminent danger to the nation.
Much or what passes for economic thinking in the twentieth century takes production for granted and focuses on the ways and means by which consumption can be increased. It proceeds as though the problem of economic life were not the production of wealth but the production of consumption. It was in this spirit that Keynes declared: "pyramid-building, earthquakes, even wars may serve to increase wealth..."
Repairing all this damage is not going to put us into the plus column, it’s just going to put us back to where we were
before the storm!
I still can not get over that damn cash for clunkers program and the requirement to destroy all the trade in vehicles. I thought communism died when the wall came down -little did I know!
I hope the kenyan marxist is unemployed soon...