Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Scientists: New GMO wheat may 'silence' vital human genes
Digital Journal ^ | 10-09-2012 | Elliott Freeman

Posted on 11/03/2012 6:26:28 AM PDT by Renfield

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last
To: Politically Correct

I used to think the same as you.

Then I got Vitamin A poisoning from eating white rice (GMO). To be fair, I took too many supplements and maxed out the Vit A in my liver.

However, I eat rice every day. I had stopped taking supplements and the poisoning got worse. Then I found out that almost all rice has been modified to add lots of Vit A for the benefit of third world kids.

I switched to Non GMO organic brown rice. Problem solved.


41 posted on 11/03/2012 10:40:11 AM PDT by darth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Toddsterpatriot
I wish it could silence the stupid gene.

If only....

Even so, I'd bet the odds are far better that a stupid gene exists than a fat gene or gay gene. There's just too much of it for any other explanation to be plausible.

42 posted on 11/03/2012 10:43:59 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeminoleCounty

Thats all true. :)


43 posted on 11/03/2012 10:49:48 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Chandler

Actually the story is more complicated than that although you are correct in surmising his overweight patients did loose weight but that does not explain why his thin and physically fit heart patients also improved. There were also quite intriguing consequences of the diet such as dramatic improvements with arthritis and asthma.

Check it out:
CBS interview -
http://www.cbsnews.com/video/watch/?id=7420352n

WHEAT BELLY blog -
http://www.wheatbellyblog.com/featured-articles/


44 posted on 11/03/2012 10:51:18 AM PDT by Madam Theophilus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Mase

If FreeRepublic has done nothing else in the scientific arena, it has exposed ideology masquerading as science. This new “science” resists examination, refuses debate, and paints its questioners as Luddites who long for a return to the Dark Ages.

Here’s a popular quote you might wish to adopt, as it’ll probably come in handy whenever the ignorant question your authoritative declarations:

“The science is settled. The debate is over.”


45 posted on 11/03/2012 10:51:42 AM PDT by LearsFool ("Thou shouldst not have been old, till thou hadst been wise.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: fremont_steve; SeminoleCounty

He comes to freerepublic same reason I do. We have big problems with the attitudes of global elitists, socialism and corporate welfare. Why do you come to freerepublic?

Genetically engineered food needs to be studied and does not deserve being given a corner on the food market by corrupted politicans giving them special considerations.


46 posted on 11/03/2012 10:55:38 AM PDT by SaraJohnson
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dljordan
"Maybe the wheat was designed to get rid of millions of pesky humans. What kind of wheat does George Soros and Bill Gates consume?"

Or perhaps, the effort to ban hardier, higher yield, GMOs is spearheaded by the likes of Soros in an effort to starve millions of pesky humans.

47 posted on 11/03/2012 10:57:52 AM PDT by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: SLB

FYI


48 posted on 11/03/2012 10:58:35 AM PDT by Stonewall Jackson ( "I must study politics and war that my sons may have liberty to study mathematics and philosophy.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
"Settled science" is most always about politics, not science. It's foolish to present science as "settled." You will hear that term a great deal on FR, however. If you wish to take issue with any of my "authoritative declarations" then have at it. Otherwise, quit whining.

I don't fear debate on this subject. That's absurd. I took issue with the people who fear things they don't understand. Fear of Bt corn, when this particular genetic engineering makes food much safer for consumers, is irrational. If pointing that out gets your panties in a wad, it isn't my fault. Deal.

49 posted on 11/03/2012 11:01:58 AM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: LearsFool
If FreeRepublic has done nothing else in the scientific arena, it has exposed ideology masquerading as science.

That's true, I never knew there were so many people who think their fear of pasteurization is somehow based on science.

“The science is settled. The debate is over.”

The science is never settled. And we'll always have fear mongers and their anti-science.

50 posted on 11/03/2012 12:24:48 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Mase
You're not being careful, you're being foolish.

There are no human clinical trials of genetically engineered foods. The persistence in the human digestive system of DNA from dietary GM plants is unknown. What is the 35 year impact of Bt on the body? We don't know.

Your faith in the big government FDA, EPA, USDA and Monsanto is strong.

Big government always does the right thing. /s

There is an amazing revolving door between Monsanto and the government agencies you so trust. Michael R. Taylor, the FDA's deputy commissioner for policy, wrote the FDA's rBGH labelling guidelines. Taylor was a former lawyer for the Monsanto corporation for seven years. More here. Revolving Door

A little long – 94 minutes – but full of good information. Genetic Roulette – The gamble of our lives

I don’t like being on the side of the Greens, but I simply don’t trust what our government tells us about the saftey of our food.

51 posted on 11/03/2012 12:39:53 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Madam Theophilus

Wheat is not alone in its potential unhealthy effects. The year-round consumption of large quantities of carbohydrates is a very recent development in the history of the human body—so recent that it is unlikely that our bodies have evolved to handle it.


52 posted on 11/03/2012 12:54:37 PM PDT by Jeff Chandler (Soebarkah Soetoro)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Our response to certain factors is also unique to each one of us.

How many GMO studies have been conducted on humans? What is the 35 year impact? We don't know. We used to think lead in our paint was OK. People still think mercury in tooth fillings is OK.

A huge gamble I don't want to make. I just don't know the odds.

53 posted on 11/03/2012 12:56:19 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
Your post speaks directly to my previous post about people fearing the things they don't understand. There has been a clinical trial of genetically modified foods going on for hundreds of years. And, today, we live longer, healthier lives than at any other time in human history.It doesn't matter if these changes are made through natural selection or from gene splicing. The latter only speeds up the process. The end result is the same. It has nothing to do with faith in the FDA, EPA, USDA or Monsanto. The R&D people at Monsanto consume the very foods their products make better. My confidence comes from understanding enough about nutrition, physiology and food science to separate fact from fiction.

By the way, rBGH is biochemically identical to the same hormone the cow produces naturally. You should also be aware that bovine growth hormones do not dock with human hormone receptors. Again, your fear is not supported by legitimate science so you are, once again, being irrational.

Demonizing Monsanto is for anti-science agitators and anti-capitalists. Conservatives shouldn't be engaging in such nonsense. By doing so, you are highlighting your lack of scientific knowledge and you are absolutely siding with the green whackos. You should reconsider that posture.

54 posted on 11/03/2012 12:56:59 PM PDT by Mase (Save me from the people who would save me from myself!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack

“Or perhaps, the effort to ban hardier, higher yield, GMOs is spearheaded by the likes of Soros in an effort to starve millions of pesky humans.”

Hmmm, I think I’ll sit in the corner and go quietly insane now.


55 posted on 11/03/2012 1:06:21 PM PDT by dljordan (Voltaire: "To find out who rules over you, simply find out who you are not allowed to criticize.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
There are no human clinical trials of genetically engineered foods.

You claim makes this

"What we found is that the molecules created in this wheat, intended to silence wheat genes, can match human genes, and through ingestion, these molecules can enter human beings and potentially silence our genes," Heinemann stated. "The findings are absolutely assured. There is no doubt that these matches exist."

sound like a lie.

56 posted on 11/03/2012 1:08:32 PM PDT by Toddsterpatriot (Math is hard. Harder if you're stupid.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive
A huge gamble I don't want to make. I just don't know the odds.

Then manage for your situation. Get in the organic food aisle if that works for you. Grow your own food and know the people who grow your food.

Don't make everyone else change for you. There is no 100% food safety. Say that out loud.

And most of all, don't think the the govt is the solution to your food safety!

People with full stomachs have a lot of time to complain and pass laws. When we are starving, we are not so fussy. We have just had many years good growing conditions, not like in the 30’s and 50’s. We think this is the norm. We used to carry a one year supply of grain into the new harvest, now if there is 1,000 bushels over supply we just mis managed in our “just in time” thinking. We think we can manage nature. We have some surprises coming.

A good day is a full stomach as my African friend told me.

57 posted on 11/03/2012 1:15:17 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]

To: reformedliberal

Gene’s survive the same way vitamins do... some get broken down, others make it through the stomach/instestine blood barrier for direct absorption.

Asking your question ...think about how medicine works etc. Why are we influenced by hormones etc.

Why do we take some things orally and other intraveneous? That is where your answer rests.


58 posted on 11/03/2012 1:23:35 PM PDT by EBH (0bama is guilty of willful neglect of duty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: PeterPrinciple
Don't make everyone else change for you.

I just don't want Monsanto, ADM, the FDA, EPA, USDA making my food choices.

Look at what the 'junk science' of Ansel Keyes and his "Seven Countries" study did to the American diet. He falsely correlated saturated fats with heart disease. This led to taking fat out of foods. Unfortunately, food without fat tastes like cardboard, so they added sugar. Now obesity and diabetes are at epidemic proportions. All sanctioned by the FDA.

You can continue to eat GMO foods if you want. I choose not to. Just don’t make me make your choices.

59 posted on 11/03/2012 1:52:28 PM PDT by FatherofFive (Islam is evil and must be eradicated)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: FatherofFive

You can continue to eat GMO foods if you want. I choose not to. Just don’t make me make your choices.


So what do you really want? We both agree you have freedom and choice.


60 posted on 11/03/2012 1:56:17 PM PDT by PeterPrinciple ( (Lord, save me from some conservatives, they don't understand history any better than liberals.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-71 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson