I know what radical homosexual activists vote like and what policies they enact. I also know that they warp everything around them through the prism of their sexuality. If you can name a gay pol that has not, I will stand corrected. If you cannot, then why on earth empower one?
Far better men than I (The founding fathers) had a lot to say about embracing the enemy. Ronaldus himself talked about a party standing for something and not embracing the ideals of the opposition.
They are wrong, or people who vote for liberals are wrong. One or the other. They cannot logically all be correct.
Far better men than I (The founding fathers) had a lot to say about embracing the enemy. Ronaldus himself talked about a party standing for something and not embracing the ideals of the opposition.
They are wrong, or people who vote for liberals are wrong. One or the other. They cannot logically all be correct.
The point I was making is that what we get from this GOP guy can't be any worse than what we got from Tierney. There's no compromising of principles involved. Did we compromise our principles when we allied with Stalin to fight Hitler? No - we had some goals in common, and we worked together to accomplish them. We want to turf Tierney and so does this new guy. If he turns out to be a problem, we can primary him and run a Republican for this seat the next time around.