Posted on 11/01/2012 8:17:00 PM PDT by PAR
This will likely not be a popular opinion but I suspect many here are thinking the same thing and are probably keeping quiet because we are so close to the election and we all desperately want to be rid of Obama (If you doubt that I feel that way check out my posting history).
The Marine who was on tonight essentially said that men & women in uniform everywhere believe that the fundamental tenet that our service people never leave anyone behind is under attack.
I understand that Romney is pursing what he believes is the best strategy to win, and he probably believes that talking about Benghazi introduces an element of risk that just isn't necessary at this point. He thinks he has it wrapped up. But, given the the seriousness of Obama's malfeasance, I believe that in order for Romney to behave with integrity and as a leader he must, at the bare minimum, let the people know that he understands the gravity of the situation and at least ask some very pointed and relevant questions. This situation demands it.
I defended Romney's liberal policies and actions in Mass. because I said he had to "go along to get along" in such a liberal state. But even when I said it what bothered me most about it is that we have someone who perhaps compromises his principles in order to get what he wants/needs. Now would be an excellent time, Mr. Romney, to demonstrate to conservatives and those in uniform that you will stand up for what is right regardless the consequences.
Romney is clearly dodging the issue. He thinks the economy will win him the election and other stuff are distractions. Plus he shot too soon and drew MSM attention to himself and now is gunshy.
If he loses he will look like just another stupid AH like McCain was.
The last thing Romney needs is the weekend before the election to be filled with media reports that he has made "wild, reckless, baseless" claims that the Obama administration was somehow running guns to Islamic terrorists and committing treason against this country. News like that might make a lot of Independents say "What a loon! I'm not voting for that guy! He's a nut!"
This is the third or fourth post I’ve answered regarding this. People are NOT thinking about what is involved here: CIA, intelligence, security, etc. This isn’t about Mitt, as another person mentioned on the OTHER “Mitt should speak out thread.” IF Mitt were to say anything the MSM would make Benghazi about the political race. This is more than that. Heroes died. They need to be vindicated.
Mitt has most likely been privy to intelligence briefings so anything he says might not be okay for speaking outloud. The info may have not been declassified yet.
We should know better...we complain about security leaks by Dems and then want Mitt to do the same.
It’s not that Romney doesn’t care or think that the Bengazi story is a huge scandal. It’s just that 90 percent of voters know so little of it (thanks to an absentee media) that it won’t resonate like the focus on the economy. Sad to say, but it probably didn’t test well with focus groups, and at this point, he’s better of expending time and energy on what has worked and continues to work. I can’t wait to evict Obama.
It won’t do his chances any good, and it will not bring anyone back to life. The moment he says something there will be two possible risks that those that only follow big media will see-
1) Romney is giving away secrets from his briefings - even if it is stuff available on any media outlet, if it is also stuff he was told in a meeting the press will ask for conservative outrage that they show when they claim Obama can’t keep a secret.
2) going back to the ‘leaks’. You know there is a great chance for an Obama positive ‘leak’ that refutes Romney simply because it is supposed to be a secret therefore the White House will neither confirm nor deny it and no one will be able to verify it.
Right now its a no win from Romney’s position.
I repeat, the most farcical thing I have seen in my 61 years on this Earth is the journalism community castigating Romney for not doing their job. Romney has been getting briefed on National Security matters and has to walk a very fine line here. He can not reveal briefing material because he has sworn not to. And it is not his job to do what a free press in a free country should be doing. The disgrace rests solely on the shoulders of journalists and I hope I live long enough to see them get their just due.
I think you answered your own question
He can’t address it now. The media is lined up hoping he’ll address it. That’s probably what Obama is praying for because he has to address it himself. Romney can’t take a chance right now. We’ll get him. The people who will vote for him wouldn’t hold him responsible even if Mitt said anything. Patience.
He can’t address it now. The media is lined up hoping he’ll address it. That’s probably what Obama is praying for because he has to address it himself. Romney can’t take a chance right now. We’ll get him. The people who will vote for him wouldn’t hold him responsible even if Mitt said anything. Patience.
I have said this before, but in my devious mind I can see Mitt being intentionally fed intelligence about Benghazi so that he can't talk about it publicly. Do you think the left would think of that? I do. I'm sure David Axlerod, and Obama would.
this issue is not one that is easily communicated in a soap box speech to supporters.
IMO it’s best that this issue is talked about via surrogates on sit down news progs and Sunday shows for now. We just can’t risk one stupid voter or the media spinning his words against him. We don’t have the media on our side, except Fox.
but first thing Wed morning, I expect Romney to begin talking about this, explaining the situation to those who aren’t up to speed and get his ducks in a row to do something about The Traitor once he takes office. but he should convene an investigation starting Wednesday. No doubt.
Imagine a thumb pointed down.
Perhaps you could bring this up again.... next fing Wednesday.
I wouldnt say that. It’s all over facebook. and the nitwits have to see it.
The problem is that for all we or anyone else knows, Romney doesn’t see it as a significant issue or one worth discussing. I think he can bring it up without coming across as politicizing it. He simply needs to say that others have raised relevant questions that have a bearing on whether the Americans in Benghazi needlessly died and that those questions could be answered right NOW by the administration. Then tell us what the questions are.
I see it, too, that’s how those people act and think. I wish it wasn’t that way, but these are not normal times.
When he wins, the whole place needs a good cleaning of all the Clintonistas, Obamaites, and even some RINO Bushies.
Crowley shut him down when he was going for the Marxist’s throat, and he was smart enough to spot the trap Sheiffer laid out in the third debate.
What can he say now? Watch Fox News? It’s the only news outlet (cable channel) reporting on Benghazi. The alphabets are silent and cnn is reporting B.S.
Pray and hope for something to break BIG tomorrow.
yep.
Rule #1: When your opponent is busy digging himself into a hole, don’t interrupt him...
Romney is handling this exactly right. Note that he is not privy to classified intelligence reports. Anything he says would be conjecture and can easily be refuted and ridiculed by the Obama campaign.
Elected officials such as McCain, Ayotte, and others are already raising cain over this issue.
Lastly, most voters have no clue about details of Benghazigate.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.