Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CNN: Intelligence official offers new timeline for Benghazi attack
CNN ^ | November 1, 2012

Posted on 11/01/2012 5:01:57 PM PDT by maggief

A senior U.S. Intelligence official discounted a Fox news report from last Friday that said officials within the CIA chain of command denied repeated requests from its officers on the ground to assist during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

The official insisted that the CIA operators on the ground were in charge of their movements and the safety of those who were preparing to respond was also an important consideration.

"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," the official said.

The official detailed the minute by minute account of what they say happened that night. There was a roughly 25 minute gap between when the officers at a nearby annex received the call for help from the mission to when the officers were able to get on their way to assist. During that time the officers at that annex location were getting their weapons loaded into vehicles, while others were on the phone trying to get local "friendly" militias with heavier weapons to help.

(Excerpt) Read more at security.blogs.cnn.com ...


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: benghazi; shadowwars; threatmatrix

1 posted on 11/01/2012 5:01:58 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: ColdOne; penelopesire; hoosiermama; SE Mom; MestaMachine; LucyT; thouworm; kristinn; onyx; ...

PING!


2 posted on 11/01/2012 5:04:18 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
... the safety of those who were preparing to respond was also an important consideration.

But, piss on the guys, including our ambassador, being attacked! Didn't worry about their safety!!

3 posted on 11/01/2012 5:11:54 PM PDT by Bushbacker1 (I miss President Bush! 2012 - The End Of An Error! (Oathkeeper))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

You mean it wasn’t a random protest of a video?

Washington did not offer any assistance at all. Our guys in Libya were totally on their own. The QRF was already in Libya. They were part of the same team. No one from outside was sent to help. Our cowards in DC left them to fight their own way out. They sent them there. And left them. They even had to charter their own air transport. Now I know the CIA has access to plenty airplanes and such. And you can’t tell me we only had one pilot among the bunch because Glen Doherty could fly.

But I like how they are coming up with yet another version of what happened.


4 posted on 11/01/2012 5:12:13 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
So CNN, no name for this Senior [Obama appointed] official?

that said officials within the CIA chain of command denied repeated requests from its officers on the ground to assist during the attack on the U.S. mission in Benghazi.

Uummmm ...so called senior Obama official, the "stand down" orders came from somewhere else outside of the CIA. Your obfuscation is not going to work.

"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," the official said.

Not jiving of what is known or what Beck says he knows.

Glenn Beck to Media Outlets Sitting on Damning Benghazi Emails: Release Them or Be Exposed

5 posted on 11/01/2012 5:15:31 PM PDT by Red Steel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I knew this 6 weeks ago, glad CNN is now informed. So the white house watched this group get killed live on tv. They also sent no assets to help. Too bad this will be spun to discredit Fox.

Shame on CNN and people at the CIA.


6 posted on 11/01/2012 5:15:34 PM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I guess CNN and The WP finally got their marching orders from the WH. Pathetic. If they think this is gonna fly...they are dead wrong.


7 posted on 11/01/2012 5:18:00 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief
A senior U.S. Intelligence official

I want a name. Who is this? Come on, CNN! This is crap!

8 posted on 11/01/2012 5:18:08 PM PDT by Da Bilge Troll (Put me down for 350+)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"............while others were on the phone trying to get local "friendly" militias with heavier weapons to help."

While I'm sure that the CIA and the "Defense" Dept. (How is the Commerce Dept. not the Business Dept. that the b0z0 Bronco Bama claims to desire?) are rarely on the same page, why not try to get them to promptly put some of their their wicked assets on site?

9 posted on 11/01/2012 5:19:58 PM PDT by Paladin2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

“Too bad this will be spun to discredit Fox.”

Agreed, I think the lame stream media has their marching orders on this subject, ABC dissed Fox today also....
See http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2953393/posts


10 posted on 11/01/2012 5:24:28 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Okay, I already have questions abou this timeline:

The timeline:

–Around 9:40pm (local time) the Annex receives the first call that the Mission is under attack.

–Fewer than 25 minutes later, a security team leaves the Annex for the Mission.

____ What ‘security team’? How many?

–Over the next 25 minutes the team members approach the compound, attempt to secure heavy weapons, and make their way onto the compound in the face of enemy fire.

____ What do they mean by “attempt to secure heavy weapons”. From the attackers? Or their own?

–At 11:11pm the requested drone surveillance arrives over the Mission compound.

____ What was the drone supposed to be doing? Why did they request it? What did they want it to do?

–By 11:30pm all US personnel, except for US Ambassador Stevens who was missing, depart the Mission. The exiting vehicles come under fire.

____ How did they depart? How many vehicles? How many people?

–Over the next roughly 90 minutes, the Annex receives sporadic small arms fire and rocket propelled grenade rounds. The security team returns fire and the attackers disperse at approx 1am.

____ Okay, was the CIA annex being fired on while the “securtiy team” was over a the Mission? If so, who was left behind to defend? How many? Or did the firing resume once the “security team and Mission personell got back?

–At about the same time a team of additional security personnel lands at the Benghazi airport and negotiates for transport into town. Upon learning the Ambassador was missing and that the situation at the Annex had calmed the team focused on locating the Ambassador and tried to obtain information on the security situation at the hospital.

–It’s still pre-dawn when the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and an armed escort. Having learned that the Ambassador was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain the team heads to the Annex to assist with the evacuation.

–They arrive with Libyan support at the Annex at 5:15am, just before the mortar rounds begin to hit the Annex. The two security officers were killed when they took direct mortar fire as they engaged the enemy. That attack lasted only 11 minutes before dissipating

___ Okay, these “additional security personell” did they join in the defense of the annex or where they only getting others out? Was it just Doherty and Woods who were providing cover for the evacuation?

–Less than an hour later a heavily-armed Libyan military unit arrived to help evacuate the compound of all US personnel.

___ So it was a Libyan team who eventually evacuated the Annex? What happened during that hour (remember previously they said the mortar attack lasted 11 minutes. what happened in between those times?


11 posted on 11/01/2012 5:24:38 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Okay, I already have questions abou this timeline:

The timeline:

–Around 9:40pm (local time) the Annex receives the first call that the Mission is under attack.

–Fewer than 25 minutes later, a security team leaves the Annex for the Mission.

____ What ‘security team’? How many?

–Over the next 25 minutes the team members approach the compound, attempt to secure heavy weapons, and make their way onto the compound in the face of enemy fire.

____ What do they mean by “attempt to secure heavy weapons”. From the attackers? Or their own?

–At 11:11pm the requested drone surveillance arrives over the Mission compound.

____ What was the drone supposed to be doing? Why did they request it? What did they want it to do?

–By 11:30pm all US personnel, except for US Ambassador Stevens who was missing, depart the Mission. The exiting vehicles come under fire.

____ How did they depart? How many vehicles? How many people?

–Over the next roughly 90 minutes, the Annex receives sporadic small arms fire and rocket propelled grenade rounds. The security team returns fire and the attackers disperse at approx 1am.

____ Okay, was the CIA annex being fired on while the “securtiy team” was over a the Mission? If so, who was left behind to defend? How many? Or did the firing resume once the “security team and Mission personell got back?

–At about the same time a team of additional security personnel lands at the Benghazi airport and negotiates for transport into town. Upon learning the Ambassador was missing and that the situation at the Annex had calmed the team focused on locating the Ambassador and tried to obtain information on the security situation at the hospital.

–It’s still pre-dawn when the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and an armed escort. Having learned that the Ambassador was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain the team heads to the Annex to assist with the evacuation.

–They arrive with Libyan support at the Annex at 5:15am, just before the mortar rounds begin to hit the Annex. The two security officers were killed when they took direct mortar fire as they engaged the enemy. That attack lasted only 11 minutes before dissipating

___ Okay, these “additional security personell” did they join in the defense of the annex or where they only getting others out? Was it just Doherty and Woods who were providing cover for the evacuation?

–Less than an hour later a heavily-armed Libyan military unit arrived to help evacuate the compound of all US personnel.

___ So it was a Libyan team who eventually evacuated the Annex? What happened during that hour (remember previously they said the mortar attack lasted 11 minutes. what happened in between those times?


12 posted on 11/01/2012 5:25:22 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Okay, I already have questions abou this timeline:

The timeline:

–Around 9:40pm (local time) the Annex receives the first call that the Mission is under attack.

–Fewer than 25 minutes later, a security team leaves the Annex for the Mission.

____ What ‘security team’? How many?

–Over the next 25 minutes the team members approach the compound, attempt to secure heavy weapons, and make their way onto the compound in the face of enemy fire.

____ What do they mean by “attempt to secure heavy weapons”. From the attackers? Or their own?

–At 11:11pm the requested drone surveillance arrives over the Mission compound.

____ What was the drone supposed to be doing? Why did they request it? What did they want it to do?

–By 11:30pm all US personnel, except for US Ambassador Stevens who was missing, depart the Mission. The exiting vehicles come under fire.

____ How did they depart? How many vehicles? How many people?

–Over the next roughly 90 minutes, the Annex receives sporadic small arms fire and rocket propelled grenade rounds. The security team returns fire and the attackers disperse at approx 1am.

____ Okay, was the CIA annex being fired on while the “securtiy team” was over a the Mission? If so, who was left behind to defend? How many? Or did the firing resume once the “security team and Mission personell got back?

–At about the same time a team of additional security personnel lands at the Benghazi airport and negotiates for transport into town. Upon learning the Ambassador was missing and that the situation at the Annex had calmed the team focused on locating the Ambassador and tried to obtain information on the security situation at the hospital.

–It’s still pre-dawn when the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and an armed escort. Having learned that the Ambassador was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain the team heads to the Annex to assist with the evacuation.

–They arrive with Libyan support at the Annex at 5:15am, just before the mortar rounds begin to hit the Annex. The two security officers were killed when they took direct mortar fire as they engaged the enemy. That attack lasted only 11 minutes before dissipating

___ Okay, these “additional security personell” did they join in the defense of the annex or where they only getting others out? Was it just Doherty and Woods who were providing cover for the evacuation?

–Less than an hour later a heavily-armed Libyan military unit arrived to help evacuate the compound of all US personnel.

___ So it was a Libyan team who eventually evacuated the Annex? What happened during that hour (remember previously they said the mortar attack lasted 11 minutes. what happened in between those times?


13 posted on 11/01/2012 5:27:20 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: crosslink
DOS briefing ( here- http://www.state.gov/r/pa/prs/ps/2012/10/198791.htm ) establishes Agent in consulate TOC to have immediately started contacting 1. Quick Reaction Security Team at Annex 2. Libyan Authorities 3. Embassy in Tripoli and, 4. WASHINGTON.

We know from other reports that Obama and DOD Panetta were meeting soon after that. Egypt and Middle East already aflame. One thing Obama has shared in the weeks after this is that “no one wants to find out what happened” more than he because the Ambassador was his and the nation's representative. Withe the Middle East aflame on 9-11, Obama and Panetta meeting.... They both want us to believe they knew nothing or even just a little about what was happening in Benghazi? At the best, Obama is guilty of leading his troops from behind. He is trying to abdicate his responsibilities as Commander in Chief while his Sec of Defense is right next to him. At the best, afraid to make a decision to protect his, our representative in Benghazi. If not for fear of making a decision then WHY? At worst, he is guilty of some of the other theories about why he would not make a decision.

14 posted on 11/01/2012 5:27:20 PM PDT by Mizpah ((Teach your children how to think, not what to think.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paladin2

to get them to promptly put some of their their wicked assets on site?

This appears to be a CIA cover our ass operation,they did not want any other branch involved. This also could have been tightly Controled by a single person. Who would not want anyone to know what was happening at that annex. So much that they would watch people die instead of helping with the military .


15 posted on 11/01/2012 5:28:44 PM PDT by crosslink (Moderates should play in the middle of a busy street)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

MSM full-front misdirection attack.


16 posted on 11/01/2012 5:30:51 PM PDT by maggief
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

Okay, I already have questions abou this timeline:

The timeline:

–Around 9:40pm (local time) the Annex receives the first call that the Mission is under attack.

–Fewer than 25 minutes later, a security team leaves the Annex for the Mission.

____ What ‘security team’? How many?

–Over the next 25 minutes the team members approach the compound, attempt to secure heavy weapons, and make their way onto the compound in the face of enemy fire.

____ What do they mean by “attempt to secure heavy weapons”. From the attackers? Or their own?

–At 11:11pm the requested drone surveillance arrives over the Mission compound.

____ What was the drone supposed to be doing? Why did they request it? What did they want it to do?

–By 11:30pm all US personnel, except for US Ambassador Stevens who was missing, depart the Mission. The exiting vehicles come under fire.

____ How did they depart? How many vehicles? How many people?

–Over the next roughly 90 minutes, the Annex receives sporadic small arms fire and rocket propelled grenade rounds. The security team returns fire and the attackers disperse at approx 1am.

____ Okay, was the CIA annex being fired on while the “securtiy team” was over a the Mission? If so, who was left behind to defend? How many? Or did the firing resume once the “security team and Mission personell got back?

–At about the same time a team of additional security personnel lands at the Benghazi airport and negotiates for transport into town. Upon learning the Ambassador was missing and that the situation at the Annex had calmed the team focused on locating the Ambassador and tried to obtain information on the security situation at the hospital.

–It’s still pre-dawn when the team at the airport finally manages to secure transportation and an armed escort. Having learned that the Ambassador was almost certainly dead and that the security situation at the hospital was uncertain the team heads to the Annex to assist with the evacuation.

–They arrive with Libyan support at the Annex at 5:15am, just before the mortar rounds begin to hit the Annex. The two security officers were killed when they took direct mortar fire as they engaged the enemy. That attack lasted only 11 minutes before dissipating

___ Okay, these “additional security personell” did they join in the defense of the annex or where they only getting others out? Was it just Doherty and Woods who were providing cover for the evacuation?

–Less than an hour later a heavily-armed Libyan military unit arrived to help evacuate the compound of all US personnel.

___ So it was a Libyan team who eventually evacuated the Annex? What happened during that hour (remember previously they said the mortar attack lasted 11 minutes. what happened in between those times?


17 posted on 11/01/2012 5:34:58 PM PDT by Lorianne (fedgov, taxporkmoney)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

In a takeoff of an old saying,

“Who you gonna believe about a lack of security and no rescue: our words or those dead Americans?”


18 posted on 11/01/2012 5:38:36 PM PDT by blueunicorn6 ("A crack shot and a good dancer")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Additional question(s):
Where was Ambassador Stephens when this alleged rescue team was there?
Did they stand down to allow the Rape of A. Stephens?
Why did they leave him there?

It is all BS anyway. No normal person would believe it. Then again there are Democrats!


19 posted on 11/01/2012 5:40:00 PM PDT by DrDude (Governor of the 57th State)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: maggief

SEAL Team 6 Loss, Part II

1 party is sent.

That may appeal to the left-wing minimalist policy wonks, but it’s not any kind of a good tactical response, expecting 1 vector of attack to work.

Obama had all kinds of power at his hands, that could have been applied from Italy, from Sicily, and from International Waters.

But the leftist media want your eyes on the CIA birdy.

The “party” from Tripoli were sent to NEGOTIATE a rescue effort, “from the evidence.”


20 posted on 11/01/2012 5:40:19 PM PDT by First_Salute (May God save our democratic-republican government, from a government by judiciary.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Excellent inquiries. Too bad no journalism major will ask any of those before TUE, if ever.


21 posted on 11/01/2012 5:40:32 PM PDT by Teacher317 ('Tis time to fear when tyrants seem to kiss.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: crosslink

>So the white house watched this group get killed live on tv.<

.
This same group will watch the US destroyed live on TV and walk away from it, uninterestedly.


22 posted on 11/01/2012 5:42:12 PM PDT by 353FMG (The US Constitution is only as effective as those who enforce it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: maggief

I think the WHITE HOUSE Has put out talking points, this, an ABC, Washington Post and also Hampton Roads http://hamptonroads.com/2012/11/officials-insist-cia-didnt-delay-libya-rescue-effort
All saying the same thing......
Glad they are so transparent


23 posted on 11/01/2012 5:50:51 PM PDT by blueyon (The U. S. Constitution - read it and weep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

perhaps the ‘stand down’ orders were
only from the White House to the military


24 posted on 11/01/2012 5:53:42 PM PDT by RockyTx
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Now wait just a cotton picking minute here.

This is the same CNN offering a different timeline as the CNN which reported 'acquiring' the Libyan Ambassador's 'diary' from the site of the terrorist attack, after hiding it for days, and then defended their report after Hillary's state dept. condemned CNN report?

25 posted on 11/01/2012 5:54:16 PM PDT by wtd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: blueyon

The CIA released this info. And it is pretty clear that no interference (interpreted as no assistance) from Washington was made. They were on their own.


26 posted on 11/01/2012 6:00:07 PM PDT by petitfour
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: maggief; penelopesire; hoosiermama; SE Mom; MestaMachine; kristinn; thouworm

Laughable, were it not so serious.

This is unconscionable covering up and more lying for the Marxist. Their source is no source at all, save for a flunkie at the WH.


27 posted on 11/01/2012 6:00:48 PM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief


No wonder Romney didn't want to step into it in the last debate. Team Obama are crapping all over themselves each time a new version of the Benghazi narrative evolves.

The Benghazi narrative keeps evolving so much that it is about to evolve into a pigs that can fly.



pics on Sodahead

28 posted on 11/01/2012 6:10:48 PM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: maggief

TY
Wish we could do a retroactive drug test of the occupants of the WH for the day of 9-11-12.


29 posted on 11/01/2012 6:10:57 PM PDT by hoosiermama (Obama: "Born in Kenya" Lying now or then.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: maggief
"There were no orders to anybody to stand down in providing support," the official said.

IOWs - THERE WAS NO ORDER TO SEND A RESCUE TEAM!

30 posted on 11/01/2012 6:37:02 PM PDT by TigersEye (dishonorabledisclosure.com - OPSEC (give them support))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx; maggief; crosslink; MestaMachine

Bingo.

Ditto for the new Washington Post misdirection article that came out tonight too. They all finally got their marching orders from Bambi. Both are getting pilloried on Twitter and in the comment sections. It is amazing to watch the Obama progs declaring that it’s over...all questions answered now...then they launch into the predictable and tired rants about Fox News. They are such stupid morons.....lol.


31 posted on 11/01/2012 6:39:07 PM PDT by penelopesire (TIME FOR OBAMA TO ANSWER FOR BENGHAZI UNDER OATH!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Bushbacker1
Liberals, STOP TRYING to come up with cockamamie cover stories!

Every time you come out with one of these stories it CONTRADICTS wht the WH and Hillary says!

MSM, please EXPLAIN WTF was the deal with blaming the video?

All this "exemplary" behavior by the CIA, yet only 2 people from the annex came to the rescue?

Were they rogue agents?

NONE of this makes any kind of sense.

32 posted on 11/01/2012 6:39:52 PM PDT by boop ("I need another Cutty Sark"-LBJ)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: maggief

So what about some backup for the 2 brave Marines who died trying to save the people there? Mr. CIA guy, you are weaving an ever complex web of lies and it will all come out eventually. All that remains is just how much culpability you and others in the CIA will have for the lies and misconduct that has already been committed. It is pretty much obvious that Obama made unwise decisions in this instance to avoid a situation that might cost him the election. Now that the big lie has been discovered, it seems the cover-up, like always, is bigger than the original mistake. Honestly, I think the democrats are going to get blown out Tuesday like they never imagined. I can only hope that new leadership will have the drive to get to the bottom of this and to prosecute and penalize any and all who are complicit. Heads need to roll in this, some literally, if treason is proven.


33 posted on 11/01/2012 6:40:21 PM PDT by lwoodham (I am Andrew Breitbart. Don't doubt me on this.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Excellent questions.

See here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2953482/posts

WaPo’s “CIA Timeline.”


34 posted on 11/01/2012 6:42:40 PM PDT by upchuck (Our margin of victory this November 6th MUST BE greater than their margin of fraud.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: onyx

This is BULL$HIT. LIES... ALL LIES.


35 posted on 11/01/2012 6:52:13 PM PDT by SE Mom (Proud mom of an Iraq war combat vet)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Lorianne

Still asking the same old questions huh?


36 posted on 11/01/2012 6:52:21 PM PDT by dglang
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Red Steel

The administration will keep putting out new lies until they find one the New York Times will buy - then democrats will push the same lie... They’ll act like the other stories never existed... I really don’t like these people.


37 posted on 11/01/2012 6:53:01 PM PDT by GOPJ ( http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbOuxqK2T34)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: maggief; Yosemitest; butterdezillion; All

” - - - and the safety of those who were preparing to respond was also an important consideration.”

IOW, this is CIA code for STAND DOWN!

Mother Hen in DC wants everybody that is safe to stay safe.

Safety comes first. It is in the Axelrod Manual in the chapter on Safe Re-elections, page 666.


38 posted on 11/01/2012 7:17:13 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

From the liberal’s wet dream fiction movie:

BRADLEE’S OFFICE. SIMONS sits across from BRADLEE as ROSENFELD
enters quietly with a bundle of teletype paper.

SIMONS
(indicating the papers)
More denunciations?

ROSENFELD
(nods)
One Senator just gave a speech
slurring us 57 times in 20 minutes.

BRADLEE has started typing something brief. When ROSENFELD’s
done, so is he. He hands it to SIMONS.

SIMONS
What’s this?

BRADLEE
My non-denial denial.

ROSENFELD
We’re not printing a retraction?

CUT TO:

CLOSE UP—BRADLEE. He is thoughtful for a while. Then,
spinning around, staring out towards the newsroom:

BRADLEE
Fuck it, let’s stand by the boys.

And he stands, spins out of the room


39 posted on 11/01/2012 7:27:46 PM PDT by Henchster (Free Republic - the BEST site on the web!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hoosiermama

“Wish we could do a retroactive drug test of the occupants of the WH for the day of 9-11-12.”

You make an excellent point. I have been thinking the same thing.


40 posted on 11/01/2012 7:28:00 PM PDT by BlessingsofLiberty (Remember Brian Terry...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: maggief
The official detailed the minute by minute account of what they say happened that night. There was a roughly 25 minute gap between when the officers at a nearby annex received the call for help from the mission to when the officers were able to get on their way to assist. During that time the officers at that annex location were getting their weapons loaded into vehicles, while others were on the phone trying to get local “friendly” militias with heavier weapons to help.

So, let me get this straight. It is common knowledge that Al Qaeda is everywhere in Benghazi. Yet, it takes the CIA 25 minutes to get into protection mode. Really?

41 posted on 11/01/2012 9:15:18 PM PDT by Chgogal (Obama helped murder US Navy SEALs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

No, as you probably figured, that seems not to be true — they (Woods) were ready to go earlier and apparently chomping at the bit, with the motor already running. Is my understanding, and fits with the scene, though can’t find the source now on my “other device”.


42 posted on 11/02/2012 10:09:32 AM PDT by cyn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: maggief

“A senior U.S. Intelligence official discounted a Fox news report from last Friday...”

But, not in any substantive way. The goal of this article was to state this lead. => Fox is wrong...everything’s cool -dude! (What a fragile world view these people have.)


43 posted on 11/02/2012 11:59:25 AM PDT by Fitzy_888 ("ownership society")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chgogal

in retrospect, your /sarc was very clear. I’m just so angry about the petulant boy king who clearly abrogated his responsibility. Was he even in the situation room as this situation unfolded?

And how could someone in a position of power at the WH not have throttled him and get arrested ... ?? Do we have here an answer to the question “who can we trust to stand against evil?” (no one!) ?


44 posted on 11/02/2012 12:18:07 PM PDT by cyn (Benghazi. That says it all.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson