Posted on 11/01/2012 7:24:57 AM PDT by Portcall24
Sounds 100% Plausible. Wouldn’t put anything past Bath House Barry
Very often an indication of crackpottery.
It’s in an email. It must be true.
Why else would a representative of the MB visit the WH over and over again over the last year?......
ping
As long as you didn’t get it from Facebook...
Since according to our Secretary of State “Facebook is not a valid place to find facts” but youtube is...
Quite likely. However, it would be an explanation (though others exist) of why security was intentionally left lax, why no support was sent in, and why forces on the ground were ordered to stand down. In that scenario, the CIA guys who defied orders would have disrupted the scheme by turning things into an actual "hot" firefight.
And for some strange reason, which I read on another article, a drone was dispatched to cover the area before the attack took place.
The Ambassador may have come across information implicating Obama in something illegal or treasonous.
What could possibly go wrong!
Yes! Allowing radical muzzies to kidnap Stevens would've given 0bama cover for fulfilling his promise to release the terrorist blind sheik in a trade. This was part of his radical agenda. Never mind about the other Americans in the compound who might be killed in the process. What the traitor 0bama didn't count on was the heroic intervention by two AMERICAN PATRIOTS, the SEALS.
By the way: what ever happened to the policy of not negotiating with terrorists?
I never understood how it wold have worked as a botched kidnapping until I saw this video. I believe that this is the most likely scenario.
I don’t understand the point of posting such crazy stuff
And the emailer ‘saw it on the internet’ which makes it doubly true.
I think this president is capable of what many of us would deem unthinkable in his relentless pursuit of the destruction of the American way of life (as we know it).
I learned about the Bob Menendez's sex scandal on Facebook a day before it hit Drudge or Free Republic.
We sElected one.
Who needs an email to figure this one out?
I posted this hypothesis on a similar thread last night:
In the absence of answers from the White House, people will begin speculating.
I myself cannot think of any reason why someone would lower security and then flat out deny military assistance in a situation where threats of violence are occurring... especially on the anniversary of 911 weeks before a presidential election UNLESS... this was far more than incompetence and more like an orchestrated October surprise.
A caller in to Hannity today made a very good observation that Hannity really didn’t pick up on very well.
These bozos in the white house were watching real time the events that were unfolding as these Navy Seals were requesting permission to go in and assist when they were told to stand down.
This means that observers in the white house were not content to just watch 4-5 servicemen and an ambassador be killed... they were prepared to watch at least 30 people be killed or ABDUCTED.... and the 4-5 navy seals pretty much foiled whatever plans had been laid to create a situation that Obama could manipulate and resolve right before the election.
That’s right... I think Obama actually set this thing up.
And until he is willing and able to come forth with viable answers as to what happened and why, I must assume as a matter of speculation that he had a hand in orchestrating this attack at some level... most likely by proxy.
High treason is punishable by death.
Time for Obama to start answering questions... TRUTHFULLY! or like the birth certificate issue, it will never go away.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.