Skip to comments.
Gingrich: A “reliable Senator” tells me two networks have stand-down e-mails from Donilon’s office
Hotair ^
| 10/31/2012
| Ed Morrissey
Posted on 10/31/2012 9:46:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
To: onyx
Saxbe Chambliss or Johnny Isaacson?
(Georgia)
Also, didn’t Isaacson used to work for Newt?
Or Graham or DeMint of SC, only because Newt was so popular in their state, and for all our dislike of Graham he HAS been acting LIVID about Benghazi.
41
posted on
10/31/2012 11:32:44 AM PDT
by
txrangerette
("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
To: SeekAndFind
Friday news dump upcoming...
42
posted on
10/31/2012 11:33:57 AM PDT
by
StAnDeliver
(2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV)
To: SeekAndFind
This needs to pushed out before the election. The “undecideds” who don't much attention to current events; need to shaken by their shirts with this info.
43
posted on
10/31/2012 11:38:06 AM PDT
by
HereInTheHeartland
(Encourage all of your Democrat friends to get out and vote on November 7th, the stakes are high.)
To: SeekAndFind
Obama would neverlie tell the truth
44
posted on
10/31/2012 11:42:17 AM PDT
by
Karliner
( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, Romans 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
To: SeekAndFind
Issa was on FNC Hannity or Greta last week with a public plea for more information from whistle blowers. Maybe it is working.
;)
To: SeekAndFind
Watergate happened in June 1972 but did not break open until after Nixon was already re-elected. Let’s not make the same mistake again and throw Obama out of office this coming Tuesday.
To: ModelBreaker
If one of the two networks is not Fox, I dont expect to see these emails until after next Tuesday. It will take at least two weeks to authenticate them and get a second source.And so what if one of the two is Fox News? Everyone knows Faux News can't be trusted. Faux News is the mouthpiece for the RNC! (/sarcasm) Even the deep-thinking, intellectual undecideds tend to hold that view.
As long as there is ANYTHING else to report on (Sandy's aftermath should be more than enough), this (boring, complicated) Benghazi stuff will stay on the back burner, no matter what Newt says.
... unless one of the state-run news organs decides there's something to be gained in breaking the silence. CBS? NBC? Not a chance. ABC? I thought I heard Benghazi mentioned on ABC News Radio last night. But, one look at abcnewsradioonline.com says I must have been dreaming...
47
posted on
10/31/2012 11:48:14 AM PDT
by
newgeezer
(It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
To: SeekAndFind
I hope one of those two networks is ‘EIB’.
48
posted on
10/31/2012 11:56:15 AM PDT
by
golas1964
(Obama must be defeated in 2012)
To: SeekAndFind
Unless one of the networks is FNC we’ll never hear about it.
49
posted on
10/31/2012 12:04:42 PM PDT
by
clintonh8r
(Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
To: SeekAndFind
( * Secretary Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates, Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Defense Department spokesman, told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisers are appropriate for disclosure. * )
" Were going to be the most transparent administration ever "
Obama " The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are those with something to hide " .
To: SeekAndFind
So what is it ?
The emails say that it was not a terrorist attack, so they went with the lame excuse of a film that caused the Muslims to go all bat crap.
Then ? the truth comes out that it was indeed a terrorist attack and then they claim that they did not deny any requested for help in Benghazi.
So now ? these emails show us the reason for the " stand down " is because they deemed it was not a terrorist attack.
So ? the reason for inaction was to provide cover for Obama's re-election chances and they had to protect their excuse of that film.
So ? 4 people's lives were sacrificed to save the integrity of some YOUTUBE film that they used as a excuse.
To: ImJustAnotherOkie
In 2008 it was “ Stand up Chuck “ .
To: SeekAndFind
A reliable senator?
I’d guess Inhofe.
To: GraceG
To: American Constitutionalist
B:Stand up Chuck
C:But I can’t, I have no legs.
B:Don’t worry about it Chuck walk up here on your hands.
C:But I can’t, I have no arms.
B:Sorry Chuck, just watch me.
C:But I can’t, I’m blind.
B:That’s ok Chuck, just listen.
C:But I’m deaf too.
B:F-O Chuck ya gimp
To: ModelBreaker
I guess the Blaze Network can blaze a trail in getting the scope on this news of these emails.
To: SeekAndFind
Nothing on the sort of a bombshell is going to come out before the election and I doubt afterwards.
Someone probably gave Newt PhsyOp Disinformation....
57
posted on
10/31/2012 12:19:52 PM PDT
by
Vendome
(Don't take life so seriously, you won't live through it anyway)
To: Darnright
After all, he was so effective in helping flood victims in the Nashville Sahara Desert. < /S >
There now, fixed.
To: txrangerette
Must be someone in the Senate Intelligence committee.
To: MichaelCorleone
Th shame the networks into reporting them.
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-118 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson