Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich: A “reliable Senator” tells me two networks have stand-down e-mails from Donilon’s office
Hotair ^ | 10/31/2012 | Ed Morrissey

Posted on 10/31/2012 9:46:44 AM PDT by SeekAndFind

Via the Daily Caller, Newt Gingrich thinks that the Benghazi scandal might blow wide open over the next two days, thanks to e-mails that he claims two networks now possess from the office of the National Security Advisor, Tom Donilon. According to a "reliable Senator" who tipped him to the information, Gingrich says that the e-mails came in response to the request to aid the consulate in Benghazi after the attack began, and asserted that the attack wasn't a terrorist action and therefore didn't need a response:

CLICK ABOVE LINK FOR THE VIDEO

“There is a rumor — I want to be clear, it’s a rumor — that at least two networks have emails from the National Security Adviser’s office telling a counterterrorism group to stand down,” Gingrich said. “But they were a group in real-time trying to mobilize marines and C-130s and the fighter aircraft, and they were told explicitly by the White House stand down and do nothing. This is not a terrorist action. If that is true, and I’ve been told this by a fairly reliable U.S. senator, if that is true and comes out, I think it raises enormous questions about the president’s role, and Tom Donilon, the National Security Adviser’s role, the Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, who has taken it on his own shoulders, that he said don’t go. And that is, I think, very dubious, given that the president said he had instructions they are supposed to do everything they could to secure American personnel.”

That may not be the only scandal that Gingrich thinks will go prime time this week, either:

After noting that the rumor, if true, would have a substantial impact on the presidential election, Gingrich pointed to another possible “October surprise” in the coming days.

“The other big story, I think, that is going to break is on corruption and extraordinary waste in the solar power grants and direct involvement by the Obama White House, including the president, in the solar panel grants involving billions of dollars, and I suspect that’s going to break Wednesday and Thursday of this week,” Gingrich added.

Well, why won’t the “reliable Senator” speak up about the e-mails directly? I’d guess that the e-mails have been kept close to the vest at the White House end, but that someone on the other end in the intel community gave them to the “reliable Senator” either simultaneously as they were sent to the two networks, or the “reliable Senator” passed them along himself. It’s all about plausible deniability on the leak, especially since we won’t see any action in the Senate on Benghazi until after the election — not because it’s Democratic-controlled, but because they’re all back home with Congress out of session for the election.

Gingrich could be fishing, but specifying that two networks have the e-mails makes it sound like Gingrich got some inside dope. If these e-mails surface, it will create a huge headache for Barack Obama and the White House, which insisted that it didn’t deny assistance to Benghazi during the attack. Donilon works in the White House, directly answering to Obama himself. While Donilon would probably fall on his sword (or have an underling do so) if these e-mails say what Gingrich claims, there’s little chance that anyone will buy that Donilon or his staff took that decision on their own shoulders.

CNS News has another piece of the puzzle. At the time that the consulate in Benghazi came under attack, Obama and Leon Panetta were in a meeting together. What did they discuss? The White House refuses to say:

President Barack Obama met with Defense Secretary Leon Panetta and Vice President Joe Biden at the White House on Sept. 11, 2012 at 5:00 PM—just 55 minutes after the State Department notified the White House and the Pentagon that the U.S. diplomatic mission in Benghazi was under attack.

The meeting between Obama, Panetta and Biden had been scheduled before the attack took place, and the Department of Defense is not commenting now on whether the three men were aware when they met that day of the ongoing attack or whether Obama used that meeting to discuss with his defense secretary what should be done to defend the U.S. personnel who at that very moment were fighting for their lives in Benghazi.

“Secretary Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates,” Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Defense Department spokesman, told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. “However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisors are appropriate for disclosure.”

It’s impossible to imagine that the subject of the attack on the consulate didn’t come up in this discussion. It’s also impossible to imagine that Donilon would have made the decision to “stand down” on his own while both the President and the Secretary of Defense were meeting in the White House after being notified of the attack. It’s equally impossible to imagine that Panetta would have made that decision without checking with Obama during the meeting that we know they had an hour into the attack.

This leak, if it occurs, would show that the intel community has no intention of taking the fall for this debacle. That leaves a very small number of people who could have made that decision — and who need to start explaining themselves ASAP.


TOPICS: Breaking News; Foreign Affairs; News/Current Events; War on Terror
KEYWORDS: 20120911; benghazi; benghazicoverup; benghaziemails; benghazigate; benghaziobama; benghazitimeline; biden; donilon; gingrich; obama; obamabenghazi; obamamuteonbenghazi; panetta; shadowwars; threatmatrix
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

1 posted on 10/31/2012 9:46:45 AM PDT by SeekAndFind
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Heads had better start rolling.


2 posted on 10/31/2012 9:48:39 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kingattax

It is just a matter of time.


3 posted on 10/31/2012 9:50:17 AM PDT by Slyfox
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If one of the two networks is not Fox, I don’t expect to see these emails until after next Tuesday. It will take at least two weeks to authenticate them and get a second source.


4 posted on 10/31/2012 9:51:55 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind; advertising guy; Nachum; Travis McGee

Pinging a few of you to this article.


5 posted on 10/31/2012 9:52:16 AM PDT by little jeremiah (Courage is not simply one of the virtues, but the form of every virtue at the testing point. CSLewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

The million dollar question is whether these networks would report on these e-mails.

If they do so, they risk possibly causing Obama’s defeat next week. I’m not convinced that they’ll do that.


6 posted on 10/31/2012 9:52:17 AM PDT by MplsSteve (General Mills is pro-gay marriage! Boycott their products!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Is it just me? WHY does everyone have to announce in advance that something damaging to 0 is in the offing?

Nobody needs to know in advance and it only gives them time to ‘fix’ things.


7 posted on 10/31/2012 9:52:38 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone ('We the People' can and will take this country back...starting today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MplsSteve

Stand Down on Stand Down is the mantra of the day.


8 posted on 10/31/2012 9:57:15 AM PDT by ImJustAnotherOkie (zerogottago)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

America’s shame:

Bay of Pigs - JFK

Benghazi - BHO II

At least Jimmy Carter attempted a rescue mission in Iran...


9 posted on 10/31/2012 9:59:09 AM PDT by Hotlanta Mike (Resurrect the House Committee on Un-American Activities (HUAC)...before there is no America!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

What a coincidence that Obama just happened to be in the White House that day instead of being on the campaign trail.


10 posted on 10/31/2012 9:59:16 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Kennedys=Can't drive, can't ski, can't fly, can't skipper a boat, but they know what's best for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

If you thought that one corrupt and complicit media outlet had emails that, if released, would damage Obama, how would you go about getting them released to the public?

Easy. Claim that a U.S. Senator and another media outlet also have the emails. The outlet that actually has the emails will then feel forced to scoop the story.


11 posted on 10/31/2012 10:00:46 AM PDT by Brent Calvert 03969-030
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

” It will take at least two weeks to authenticate them and get a second source.” and blame the entire mess on George Bush, Dan Rather apparently has copies of the emails showing Mitt Romney Gave the order to Stand Down.


12 posted on 10/31/2012 10:01:51 AM PDT by eyeamok
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
If one of the two networks is not Fox

I don't understand what you're saying because it's a sure bet that one of the two is not Fox.

13 posted on 10/31/2012 10:04:11 AM PDT by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Gingrich could be fishing, but specifying that two networks have the e-mails makes it sound like Gingrich got some inside dope.

Additionally, specifying that two networks have them might be an attempt to force their hands into reporting on it, before the "other" network beats them to it.

14 posted on 10/31/2012 10:06:32 AM PDT by kevkrom (If a wise man has an argument with a foolish man, the fool only rages or laughs...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kevkrom

If these Networks are not Fox, I would not put it past them to sit on them
After the election. Can u say Drudge?
That’s how Drudge busted loose during the Klinton scandal.
Newsweek was sitting on the story, then Drudge unleashed it.
The rest is history.

The release of this email probably has more to do with the storm
News. It’s coming soon. Very soon.


15 posted on 10/31/2012 10:15:46 AM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
two networks = the alphabet news = wholly owned subsidiaries of the White House press office.

Dream on, Newt. They are about as likely to run with the story as you are to be elected president on a write in vote next week.

16 posted on 10/31/2012 10:17:00 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne
two networks = the alphabet news = wholly owned subsidiaries of the White House press office.

Dream on, Newt. They are about as likely to run with the story as you are to be elected president on a write in vote next week.

17 posted on 10/31/2012 10:17:18 AM PDT by Vigilanteman (Obama: Fake black man. Fake Messiah. Fake American. How many fakes can you fit in one Zer0?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope the email is not typed on an IBM Selectric with non-proportional, unkerned 12 pith Elite.


18 posted on 10/31/2012 10:18:57 AM PDT by DBrow
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: little jeremiah

The media needs to get on board with the right questions to ask. From Bing West, about POTUS handing down explicit “execute orders” for a rescue mission into Libyan air space, and from me, about “cross-border authority,” which also can only be granted by the POTUS and nobody else.


19 posted on 10/31/2012 10:20:02 AM PDT by Travis McGee (www.EnemiesForeignAndDomestic.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker

Smooth move on Newt’s part. Whoever has one now has to worry about the competition getting the drop on them. Will likely prompt one to spill the beans sooner than they’d like.


20 posted on 10/31/2012 10:22:19 AM PDT by Buckeye McFrog
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Izzy Dunne

If one of the two networks is not Fox
I don’t understand what you’re saying because it’s a sure bet that one of the two is not Fox.

Maybe the other is Fox Business....


21 posted on 10/31/2012 10:22:26 AM PDT by GraceG
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman
Heads had better start rolling.

A reassigned General and a reassigned Admiral would probably say that heads are already rolling.

Team Obama will soon be announcing a scapegoat -- the one who all this lands on.
22 posted on 10/31/2012 10:24:09 AM PDT by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
The media took Harry Reid's "rumors" on Romney and went full blast, but they'll try to discount it when Gingrich gives dingy Harry a taste of his own medicine.

It may be just a rumor, but the democrats are alerting like someone whistled in the henhouse.
23 posted on 10/31/2012 10:24:13 AM PDT by FrankR (They will become our ultimate masters the day we surrender the 2nd Amendment.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Hotlanta Mike

“At least Jimmy Carter attempted a rescue mission in Iran...”

I thought so too after all these years. That was also the first time Delta was initiated I believe.


24 posted on 10/31/2012 10:27:06 AM PDT by max americana (Make the world a better place by punching a liberal in the face)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

“Smooth move on Newt’s part. Whoever has one now has to worry about the competition getting the drop on them. Will likely prompt one to spill the beans sooner than they’d like.”

That was my thought too. That probably means Fox is NOT one of the networks that has the emails. Or, if Fox has it, Newt is trying to push one of the big three into actually covering the story for fear of being scooped by Fox.


25 posted on 10/31/2012 10:27:46 AM PDT by ModelBreaker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
There may be some truth to "Obama Fires Top Admiral As Coup Plot Fears Grows"....Obama relieves top Navy Admiral - When a CIC's behavior is other than normal and those closest to him are obviously giving him bad advice which he takes or he has joined forces with the enemy, then good and true men must act accordingly....relieve the CIC and save the nation.
26 posted on 10/31/2012 10:30:35 AM PDT by yoe (Vote for the Real American whose love for his country has NEVER been in question.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Donilon is a political hack, with no military nor foreign policy experience.
Donilon was 'criticized' by General Jones who once disparaged Donilon, for his lack of overseas experience, telling him that as a result: "You have no credibility with the military", according to Bob Woodward's "Obama's Wars". Jones said that Donilon was not good in his dealings with his staff at the National Security Council, displaying "too little feel for the people who work day and night....". Donilon did visit Afghanistan March 2010 during President Obama's six-hour late-night visit to the country.[10]
from wiki

27 posted on 10/31/2012 10:30:41 AM PDT by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your teaching is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
“The other big story, I think, that is going to break is on corruption and extraordinary waste in the solar power grants and direct involvement by the Obama White House, including the president, in the solar panel grants involving billions of dollars, and I suspect that’s going to break Wednesday and Thursday of this week,”

Oh my.

28 posted on 10/31/2012 10:30:54 AM PDT by McGruff (Obama lied. Heroes died.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Slyfox

tick, tick, tick..........


29 posted on 10/31/2012 10:37:22 AM PDT by kingattax (99 % of liberals give the rest a bad name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: tennmountainman

None of the rolling heads will belong to Obama.


30 posted on 10/31/2012 10:42:10 AM PDT by fatnotlazy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

You raise an interesting point. It wouldn’t surprise me if Obama claimed he was “betrayed” by somebody. He’s the type.


31 posted on 10/31/2012 10:43:40 AM PDT by popdonnelly (The first priority is get Obama out of the White House.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog
Smooth move on Newt’s part. Whoever has one now has to worry about the competition getting the drop on them. Will likely prompt one to spill the beans sooner than they’d like.

Whomever was the source of the email has it and I'm sure is expecting one of the news outlets to release it. If not I'd be surprised if another outlet or two didn't also get it in short order.

32 posted on 10/31/2012 10:50:47 AM PDT by NewHampshireDuo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

How much does anyone want to bet that any criticism of Dear Leader will be met with howls of indignation now that he’s so busy being “concerned” with the devastation left by Sandy?

After all, he was so effective in helping flood victims in Nashville. < /S >


33 posted on 10/31/2012 10:54:31 AM PDT by Darnright ("I don't trust liberals, I trust conservatives." - Lucius Annaeus Seneca)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Travis McGee; katiedidit1; maggief; hoosiermama

Time’s a ticking (quickly) and who’s a “reliable” senator who would share such a secret with Newt Gingrich?

I’m seriously trying to think of one, particularly one who backed him or one who was close to him during his Speakership and I can’t remember.


34 posted on 10/31/2012 10:56:23 AM PDT by onyx (FREE REPUBLIC IS HERE TO STAY! DONATE MONTHLY! IF YOU WANT ON SARAH PALIN''S PING LIST, LET ME KNOW)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Buckeye McFrog

Or it could be a bluff. If only one network has the emails, then this could be the nudge it needs to open up.


35 posted on 10/31/2012 10:57:58 AM PDT by Cato in PA (1/26/12: Bloody Thursday)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

Some things cannot be “fixed” and Benghazi is one of them.

You can hear the train whistle and see the light coming down the tunnel but there is nowhere to go.


36 posted on 10/31/2012 10:59:23 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: yoe

There is no and will be no coup plot by our military.


37 posted on 10/31/2012 11:03:56 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

bflr


38 posted on 10/31/2012 11:08:03 AM PDT by rockinqsranch (Dems, Libs, Socialists, call 'em what you will, they ALL have fairies livin' in their trees.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob

“Some things cannot be “fixed” and Benghazi is one of them.”

What I meant by that is it gives the Chicago girls and boys time to silence whomever they need to and/or destroy evidence to make sure it doesn’t see the light of day.

I just don’t see the advantage of showing your hand now (assuming there is a hand to show).


39 posted on 10/31/2012 11:13:55 AM PDT by MichaelCorleone ('We the People' can and will take this country back...starting today.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: MichaelCorleone

I think there is so much there (leaks have been killing The Disaster) that these are shots to toy with their minds. Like a mortar shot which is not repeated but which won’t leave the minds of those shelled for a long time.

Plus, by putting the media on the spot it makes them look even more like they are supporting The Disaster even more than they are if nothing is released.

In fact, there may be NOTHING to this but bringing it up still casts doubt if nothing is forthcoming. People will wonder for a few weeks “Why hasn’t the media released this?”

It is the seriousness of the charge, remember.


40 posted on 10/31/2012 11:23:13 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: onyx

Saxbe Chambliss or Johnny Isaacson?

(Georgia)

Also, didn’t Isaacson used to work for Newt?

Or Graham or DeMint of SC, only because Newt was so popular in their state, and for all our dislike of Graham he HAS been acting LIVID about Benghazi.


41 posted on 10/31/2012 11:32:44 AM PDT by txrangerette ("...hold to the truth; speak without fear". (Glenn Beck))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Friday news dump upcoming...


42 posted on 10/31/2012 11:33:57 AM PDT by StAnDeliver (2008 + IN, NE1, NC, FL, VA, OH, CO, IA, NH = 285EV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
This needs to pushed out before the election. The “undecideds” who don't much attention to current events; need to shaken by their shirts with this info.
43 posted on 10/31/2012 11:38:06 AM PDT by HereInTheHeartland (Encourage all of your Democrat friends to get out and vote on November 7th, the stakes are high.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
Obama would neverlie tell the truth
44 posted on 10/31/2012 11:42:17 AM PDT by Karliner ( Jeremiah 29:11, Romans 8:28, Romans 8:38"...this is the end of the beginning."WC)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Issa was on FNC Hannity or Greta last week with a public plea for more information from whistle blowers. Maybe it is working.

;)


45 posted on 10/31/2012 11:45:23 AM PDT by Irish Eyes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Watergate happened in June 1972 but did not break open until after Nixon was already re-elected. Let’s not make the same mistake again and throw Obama out of office this coming Tuesday.


46 posted on 10/31/2012 11:46:22 AM PDT by SamAdams76
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ModelBreaker
If one of the two networks is not Fox, I don’t expect to see these emails until after next Tuesday. It will take at least two weeks to authenticate them and get a second source.

And so what if one of the two is Fox News? Everyone knows Faux News can't be trusted. Faux News is the mouthpiece for the RNC! (/sarcasm) Even the deep-thinking, intellectual undecideds tend to hold that view.

As long as there is ANYTHING else to report on (Sandy's aftermath should be more than enough), this (boring, complicated) Benghazi stuff will stay on the back burner, no matter what Newt says.

... unless one of the state-run news organs decides there's something to be gained in breaking the silence. CBS? NBC? Not a chance. ABC? I thought I heard Benghazi mentioned on ABC News Radio last night. But, one look at abcnewsradioonline.com says I must have been dreaming...

47 posted on 10/31/2012 11:48:14 AM PDT by newgeezer (It is [the people's] right and duty to be at all times armed. --Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

I hope one of those two networks is ‘EIB’.


48 posted on 10/31/2012 11:56:15 AM PDT by golas1964 (Obama must be defeated in 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind

Unless one of the networks is FNC we’ll never hear about it.


49 posted on 10/31/2012 12:04:42 PM PDT by clintonh8r (Happy to be represented by Lt. Col. Allen West)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SeekAndFind
( * “Secretary Panetta met with President Obama, as the White House-provided scheduled indicates,” Lt. Col. Todd Breasseale, a Defense Department spokesman, told CNSNews.com on Tuesday. “However, neither the content nor the subject of discussions between the President and his advisers are appropriate for disclosure.” * )




" Were going to be the most transparent administration ever "

Obama " The only people who don't want to disclose the truth are those with something to hide " .
50 posted on 10/31/2012 12:07:01 PM PDT by American Constitutionalist
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-5051-100101-118 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson