Suffolk poll shows Warren leading Brown by 7

Boston.com ^ | 10/30/2012 | Noah Bierman

[BlatherNaut]

A new poll released today shows Elizabeth Warren leading Senator Scott Brown by 7 percentage points, one of the Democratic challenger’s largest leads in any poll taken in recent months.

The poll, by Suffolk University/News 7, was released a day after a Boston Globe poll showed a much tighter race, with Brown leading by 2 percentage points. The Globe poll showed an exact tie when including responses from voters who did not express an initial preference but said they were leaning in one direction.

[Paladin2]

I guess we’ll have to wait for the final poll.

[WashingtonSource]

Phony poll? Another poll yesterday had Brown up 2.

[Humble Servant]

I really don’t think there’s any way Warren’s up 7.

[RoseofTexas]

That’s a shocker...Suffolk is very reliable...bummer! I pray I am wrong...any comment from folk there in MA? How do you see the race?

[Breto]

Both these people suck leftist air... who cares..

[Mr. Lucky]

Yeah, control of the Senate is no big deal. Right?

[ExTexasRedhead]

Liberal Fantasy Island

[BlueStateRightist]

This state is hopeless.

[blueunicorn6]

Paleface Lizzy is running for the US Senate from Massachusetts. That’s about all we can say for sure about her. The Democrats in Massachusetts have to be kicking themselves. The Illinois Democrats got their grifter Obama elected President and his buddies are making some real money. They’re hoping Paleface Lizzy can send some government sugar their way.

[nhwingut]

Suffolk is a legit polling firm. We shall see.

I personally think Brown has run a horrid campaign, compared to 2010.

He’s got a needle to thread relative to ideology in such a liberal-leaning state, but he’s gone far too left, IMO - providing little in policy contrast.

His most recent ad was basically saying I am a proud Democrat - I support Planned Parenthood, Dodd/Frank and Gays in the Military.

[stephenjohnbanker]

Boston has always liked crooked liberals. History proves it.

[Jane Long]

I personally think Brown has run a horrid campaign, compared to 2010.

I would think his campaign donation amounts have to be down tremendously, compared to (Tea Party assisted) 2010 contributions.

[ptsal]

This has to be mis-worded. Lizzy is boosting 7-Up.... She needs that lithium lifter...

[ScottinVA]

Wow.. they are just predisposed to gravitate toward corrupt, lying democrats up there, aren`t they?

[DallasDeb]

Real Clear shows Warren up by 4.5.

[Catsrus]

I hope that Brown wins. However, he threw the Tea Party under the bus and that wasn’t a cool thing for him to do. He’s also good friends with Lurch Kerry - also from MA. The people in MA are hopeless. They really are. No wonder Mitt only wanted to serve one term in that horrible land of libtards.

[SunkenCiv]

Warren isn’t leading, she’s trailing, the margin is just tight.

The polls which show her with a lead are just shilling for Fauxahontas.

Thanks BlatherNaut.

[E. Pluribus Unum]

Not to worry.

Ubama is going down, and he is going to have loooooonnnnngggg coattails.

[freekitty]

BS

[BlatherNaut]

"Yeah, control of the Senate is no big deal. Right?"

Also was listening to Howie Carr speaking with Scott Brown yesterday while hunkered down in my hurricane bunker, and Brown said he, Collins and Leiberman are working on supoenas re Benghazi.

Fauxcahontas would undoubtably be more interested in the coverup rather than finding out what really happened.

Howie raised the topic at around the 10:32 point in the video.

http://audio.wrko.com/a/65531003/frontrunner-sen-scott-brown-checks-in-on-hurricane-sandy.htm

[Gay State Conservative]

There was another poll a few days ago by Boston’s NPR station showing Brown +2.

[ladyjane]

Yes, they are both leftists but Elizabeth Warren is much much worse.

[bramps]

If Brown loses it will largely be due to him answering, during his last debate, that Justice Scalia is is his idea of an ideal justice. Brown has no core principals. He's constantly trying to please everyone and that question really had him caught in the no man's land where he lives. He then sounded even more ridiculous when he started naming other justices because he realized that he really stuck his foot in his mouth. And for some time now he's been really pushing his support for abortion and planned parenthood. He's essentially given us the choice between a democrat and a democrat, and the pathetic electorate of this disgraceful state will likely pick the democrat every time.

[spawn44]

Internals show poll slanted +12 Mohicans

[Breto]

“Yeah, control of the Senate is no big deal. Right?

Well according to Scott Brown it isn’t because in his words he would choose which side to support regardless of party. So in the event of a 49/50 and a Romney win he could give the leadership to Harry Ried. That man, Scott Brown, is self sucking scumbag...

[Road Glide]

“Ubama is going down, and he is going to have loooooonnnnngggg coattails.”

Not in Massachusetts, however. There, he’ll win 55-60% of the vote.

Scott Brown was a political fluke — a nice guy who appeared at the right moment with a good line (a la “this is the people’s seat!”).

But he isn’t the type of politician who the majority of the people of Massachusetts really want. They’re gonna show us who they want in another week...