Now the US finds it a-ok to kill the son for the sins of the father.
Wow.
If the father takes his son into the armed camp of the enemy, behind enemy lines, and the son is killed in a strike on the enemy, I suppose that is killing the son for the sins of the father.
It is a bit of a stretch. This did not occur in a place where warrants could be served.
Unto the seventh generation. The Kennedys and the Jihadis have a couple of more to go.