My main concern is this — WHO PAID FOR THEIR RESPECTIVE DRESSES?
It’s not my business if they paid for the wardrobe with THEIR OWN money. It becomes my business if they use Tax payer money to pay for their clothes.
I can’t believe I’m saying this, but MO actually looked pretty good (ducks and runs from incoming hot rounds...)
They’re just mad because Ann looked better. Pink is her color.
The womens’ magazines practice the worst form of political advocacy. I can’t even handle seeing their covers in the checkout line.
They proved the essence Romney’s joke to be true, the one about Obama embraced by Catholics and Romney dining with the rich.
If the taxpayers aren’t paying for it, who cares?
Yawn.
The difference is, Ann Romney PAID for her dress. Michelle Obama had hers on loan or as a donation.
+1 for Ann Romney!
Sort of jives with the joke Romney told last night in NYC.
Media will report tonight’s event this way:
“Obama embraced by Catholics; Romney dines with rich people”
Romney paid for her own, I am certain. Mitt would not have it any other way. WE paid for Michelle’s, I am equally certain.
Ann could have worn a burlap sack and looked better than that ugly wookie.