Posted on 10/18/2012 8:36:34 PM PDT by Steelfish
Well, He passed that law so I suppose He can amend it.
Yep, me too. Too bad it's nearly impossible to store.
I know you’re being facetious, but *IF* this process is reasonably efficient then it is a far more effective means of storing energy. Consider the fact that the bulky, heavy, state-of-the-art battery in the Chevy Volt only holds the energy equivalent of one gallon of gasoline. Ultimately all fossil fuels are the storage medium for solar & geothermal energy from prehistoric times.
“It will probably take more energy input than what you get out of it.”
Ya think? :)
“While the technology has the backing of Britains Institution of Mechanical Engineers, it has yet to capture the interest of major oil companies”.
Possibly because they need more than a few tons of petrol.
Yeh -- as long as the air is over a dairy farm or a Mexican burrito wagon at lunchtime.
Produced 6 liters of petrol in 3 months? And I apparently missed the part where they mentioned how many thousand pounds it cost per liter to produce! Right up there with Solyndra, et al!
not to mention that removing carbon dioxide from the atmosphere would be harmful to plants and crops ... doh!
Sure its a scam
Its a scam to get tax dollars to develop a completely useless process.
No, since burning the fuel will release the CO2 back into the air.
Their comments suggest that they failed all their science classes in high school, but were "socially promoted" anyway ... and that they have exactly zero real world exposure to real science and engineering. They probably think that "The Big Bang Theory" accurately depicts science and engineering students.
WOW! That could power my nephew's moped for a whole....week.
A red XKE Jag is a very practical car. It attracts Blondes.
>>All these stupid breakthroughs and holy grails are bunk every time we find out you have to feed more energy in than you get out.
Well of course you do. The First and Second Laws of Thermodynamics see to that. It is a given.
One of our biggest problems with energy policy is that we seem to have politicians who think otherwise running it.
How long before global warming fanatics start blaming this technology for causing global cooling because the atmosphere is being depleted of carbon dioxide.
Actually, if we re-elect Obama, he plans to repeal this law during his second term. It's far too restrictive on his energy plans for renewables. You might also expect to see him set pi to an even 3.0. It's part of an affirmative action plan to simplify math so that more will get passing grades.
Hydrogen is actually very easy to store. Just combine it with oxygen and store it as dihydrogen monoxide.
Of course, you have to be really careful when handling dihydrogen monixide because it is really dangerous stuff.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.