Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Gingrich calls out Rove super PAC, NRSC for abandoning Akin
The Daily Caller ^ | 10/14/2012 | Paul Conner

Posted on 10/15/2012 9:03:07 AM PDT by Where is todays Reagan

Former House Speaker Newt Gingrich criticized two major Republican campaign organizations for not continuing to back Republican candidate Todd Akin in the Missouri Senate race.

In an interview with The Daily Caller’s Ginni Thomas, Gingrich called out GOP “establishment types” — Crossroads GPS super PAC and the National Republican Senatorial Committee — for pulling funding from Akin, a congressman whose comments about “legitimate rape” caused a national uproar.

“If you applied the Todd Akin rule to Joe Biden, he’d be resigning the vice presidency once a week,” Gingrich said in Akin’s defense. “You have this bizarre double standard where Biden can say the weirdest things, and people just laugh and say, well, that’s just old Crazy Joe, you know; after all, he’s only vice president.”

“In Akin’s case, the establishment types saw a chance to get rid of a trouble-maker, replace him with somebody who’d be malleable, do it in the name of winning the election — and some of the things they said were quite extraordinary.”

“I mean, Karl Rove’s not-very-funny statement ‘If Akin gets murdered, don’t look for me,’ you know, I told Karl: in the age of Gabby Giffords, this isn’t funny, this isn’t a joke, you shouldn’t be able to say this in polite company.”

The former presidential candidate cited how the NRSC supported Charlie Crist instead of Marco Rubio in the Republican Florida Senate primary. “So let’s be clear, the Senate committee doesn’t always have good judgment,” he said.

“I got so angry, because I am a genuine grassroots populist, and I have a permanent suspicion of the establishment. And I got so angry at the way they were treating Todd that I agreed to go in. I think I was the first person to go in and campaign for him, and I’m delighted now that you have a number of other people campaigning for him: Jim DeMint has come in, [Mike] Huckabee has come in, [Rick] Santorum has come in.”

Gingrich predicted that Akin would defeat incumbent Democratic Sen. Claire McCaskill.

Look for the complete interview on Monday at The Daily Caller.

Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2012/10/14/gingrich-calls-out-rove-super-pac-nrsc-for-abandoning-akin-video/#ixzz29NrLgy9M


TOPICS: Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: akin; gingrich; missouri; newt; newtgingrich; rinos
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last
To: Colonel_Flagg
.

i've always suspected that Newt and the NY Congressman (Peter King ?) had inside information that the "conservative" candidate that they decided NOT to endorse had some "secret baggage" that would cost republicans in the general election...

after all, newt had loyally campaigned for literally hundreds of conservative congressional candidates, during his career, at that point ...

so why would he not support the guy ... the so-called "conservative" ?

perhaps newt knows something that we don't ...


on a similar thought ... newt's got guts to be taking on the E-RINO estahblishment, via newt's endorsement of adkins ...

at the same time ... hell would freeze over before myth ever took the kind of stand that newt takes ...

oh, i'm sorry, i forgot the "new mantra" ...

"myth is wonderful" ....
"myth is wonderful" ....
"myth is wonderful" ....
"myth is wonderful" ....
"myth is wonderful" ....
"myth is wonderful" ....





.
21 posted on 10/15/2012 10:14:37 AM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Horsehocky! That’s what I think of the crap that you’re spouting. The Republican establishment doesn’t want Akin in the Senate because he doesn’t tow the establishment line. He looks at each bill that comes across his desk in light of our US Constitution, if he doesn’t see that it follows the Constitution he doesn’t vote for it and that drives the establishment crazy. So because he has the ability to do that, he has my vote and that of all my family.

Everyone says things that are not PC, but when a republican says it, our establishment throws them out the door. Well, these are our representatives not the establishment’s, it’s time they are given a dose of reality.


22 posted on 10/15/2012 10:23:54 AM PDT by eagles_rest ("The time is near at hand which must determine whether Americans are to be free men or slaves." -G.W)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: onyx
by "legitimate rape" he was ruling out "statutory rape."

Maybe he was also ruling out fake claims of rape?

Or maybe the definition from Whoopie, not Rape, rape, because the kids mother was getting paid for letting her kid be raped. Standard Hollywood fair, I suppose.

23 posted on 10/15/2012 10:34:22 AM PDT by itsahoot (I'll write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: IslamE
I will never understand why the GOP establishment turns on their own,

Check and see if Tokyo Rove has defunded any Log Cabin Republican campaigns, maybe you will gain a little insight.

24 posted on 10/15/2012 10:37:36 AM PDT by itsahoot (I'll write in Palin in 2012. That is 1 vote for Palin, 0 votes for Romney and Zer0 votes for Obama.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Second Amendment First

If you want a stone cold idiot on the Science committee, you are looking in the mirror when you make a comment like that.

As long as idiots vote columns and pay no attention, we are all doomed. Do you think Akin should be on the Science committee? Do you believe raped women are less likely to conceive?

When did being conservative start to mean promoting ignorance. I understand that Akin’s supposed values are closer to mine than her opponnent’s but when the best you can do is run an absolute imbecile, conservatives lose sight of the larger goals and risk losing the big battles.


25 posted on 10/15/2012 11:14:26 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: uncbob

You didn’t understand the comparison at all.


26 posted on 10/15/2012 11:22:16 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: eagles_rest

Not PC?!

He thinks women are less likely to conceive if raped.

Do you want people with opinions like this making decisions on science. I don’t care that much if he is in Congress, but science.

He did not commit a gaffe. The average idiot teenager undersyands that what he said was moronic.


27 posted on 10/15/2012 11:27:51 AM PDT by sakic
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: sakic

Yeah I did
There is no comparison


28 posted on 10/15/2012 1:28:28 PM PDT by uncbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

Newt is the smartest of the lot. Too bad he had marital problems that got him kicked out of the running.

Akin goofed,don’t we all at some time or other?

Better him than McCaskill, and we want him for a friend when he is elected. It doesn’t make sense not to support him


29 posted on 10/15/2012 1:29:19 PM PDT by Venturer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-29 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson