ObamaCare transforming America into Part-Timer Nation?

Hotair ^ | 10/09/2012 | Ed Morrissey

[SeekAndFind]

Under ObamaCare, companies of more than 50 workers who do not provide health-insurance coverage have to pay significant fines, although not nearly as costly as the insurance itself. That alone might have employers bailing out of the health-insurance market, but the Orlando Sentinel reports that at least one company is testing a way to avoid both costs. Employers do not have to provide health-insurance coverage to part-time workers under ObamaCare as long as they work less than 30 hours a week, and one restaurant company has begun experimenting with changing over entire staffs to part-time work to avoid the ObamaCare mandates and fines (via Instapundit):

In an experiment apparently aimed at keeping down the cost of health-care reform, Orlando-based Darden Restaurants has stopped offering full-time schedules to many hourly workers in at least a few Olive Gardens, Red Lobsters and LongHorn Steakhouses.

Darden said the test is taking place in "a select number" of restaurants in four markets, including Central Florida, but would not give details. The company said there has been no decision made about expanding it. …

Analysts say many other companies, including the White Castle hamburger chain, are considering employing fewer full-timers because of key features of the Affordable Care Act scheduled to go into effect in 2014. Under that law, large companies must provide affordable health insurance to employees working an average of at least 30 hours per week.

If they do not, the companies can face fines of up to $3,000 for each employee who then turns to an exchange — an online marketplace — for insurance.

This is the problem with massive government interventions into markets. They create perverse incentives, and force participants in markets to look for alternatives to the massive costs of those interventions. This is one example. Businesses usually prefer stable labor pools, and full-time status and reasonable benefits usually help provide that kind of stability. As a hiring manager for years, I can tell you from personal experience that managing a part-time staff creates its own costs and headaches, much of which won’t be felt in the home office of a multiple-location entity like Darden.

However, the costs may not outweigh the savings any longer derived from dumping benefits for workers — and that’s doubly true in a bad job market for workers. There aren’t too many competitive pressures at the moment to keep Darden and other companies from pursuing this strategy. It has the benefit of boosting employment numbers, but only among those involuntarily working part time … which, as Mickey Kaus points out, is exactly what the September jobs report showed.

If this turns out to be the trend, what happens then? Reason predicts that we’ll see even more government intervention to cut off those perverse incentives … which will result in even more perverse incentives:

Of course, politicians will, no doubt, scramble to fix this insidious outcome not of the legislation they passed, but of the errors of the uncaring private sector. And that legislation will, certainly, have no more unintended consequences.

In the meantime, the ObamaCare-driven transformation of America into Part Timer Nation will end up making the lives of workers more miserable rather than less so:

This truly sucks if you’re a worker trying to piece together the paychecks needed to live a decent life. Now you have to scramble to pick up another part-time job, and neither will come with much in the way of benefits. OK, the feds will have some health program for you through the government-mandated exchanges, but goodbye vacation time and any other goodies that come from full-time status, such as manageable schedules.

Having had that experience as a hiring manager, I’m not certain that a move to part-time staffs will succeed for businesses, but it’s going to be mighty tempting for them to at least try it out. Don’t be surprised to see this expand over the next two years or so, especially in the service industries.

[Ulysse]

Leading USA toward an assisted european country with a starving economy with chronic recession and assisted , owned people.....NO MORE FREEDOM

[Pietro]

The restruaunt my wife works at is doing the same thing and I suspect thousands of small businesses across the country will as well.

[MNJohnnie]

Obama is following the standard Democrat playbook since FDR. Reduce people to dependency and they will show up to vote for you every 2 years.

The dirty secret of American politics is the Democrats do not want you to be successful. They need you to be a dependent on Government.

[nascarnation]

29 hours per week

“the new normal”

[FrankR]

Makes sense...insofar as obama looks at his job as “part time”.

[null and void]

EXCELLENT!

More part-time employees=higher job numbers!

[pallis]

I need a part time job just to pay my insurance premiums and the expenses the insurance no longer pays.

[wiggen]

Yes Obamacare largely to blame but i think it’s accelerating a process that had already begun. Awful state of affairs for those seeking work.

[Crusher138]

Taxation is punishment. If you want to see less of something, tax it.

Ever since this country went down the evil path of legalized theft - income tax - people have gone out of their way to avoid it, horribly effecting productivity.

We need to make ALL individual income tax unconstitutional. Replace current corporate income tax with a small, flat, gross receipts tax - based on sales not profit - at say, 3%.

Replace individual income tax with a national sales tax. Tax SPENDING not EARNING. Productivity will skyrocket and frugality and saving would be rewarded. No capital gains tax since the gains will be taxed when spent.

It would supercharge the economy and once again make us the most productive nation on earth.

[drbuzzard]

I work at a community college. The community college system in Colorado is a unified system run (sort of) by a central office. Each college has it’s own administration and staff, but to a degree they are all under CCCS (Colorado Community College System).

With the advent of Obamacare, it was decided that the system had to crack down on the hours of the adjunct instructors. Before Obamacare instructors could earn enough to get by on by working at multiple different colleges. To be quite honest they are paid a pittance, but once an instructor has their classes prepped (and this doesn’t need to change much semester to semester) the hours become bearable for the pay (while setting up the class, the pay rate is likely under minimum wage).

Since Obamacare has become law, CCCS has decided that as they are the actual employer of the adjuncts, total hours across all colleges must be tracked and kept below 30 hours to avoid the penalties of not providing health care.

So thus the compassionate law, and all the compassionate lefties running CCCS are going to kick the lowest paid instructors to the curb.

Each college’s IT department has been tasked with helping to develop this system for tracking adjunct hours. I don’t work on it directly, but I’ve dubbed it the “screw the adjunct system” and those that do, like the name.

Of course odds are most of the adjuncts are also lefties who voted for Obama, so I suppose there is some justice there.