Voters may see more guns at polling places(IN)

pharostribune.com ^ | 20 September, 2012 | Maureen Hayden

[TXnMA]

In order to make a comment like #16 comprehensible, you really should learn how to use HTML Tables...

Lots of good info there, but the lack of formatted organization made your effort a waste...

[marktwain]

Yes, need to learn more html.

[TXnMA]

Here it is as a crude HTML table:

		OPEN CARRY		CONCEALED CARRY
ADVANTAGES
	TACTICAL	Faster Draw, tactical deterrence		Greater surprise
	STRATEGIC	Armed Citizens a visible presence		Uncertainty about who might be carrying
	SOCIAL	Normalize Rights and Defense		Does not draw attention to yourself
DIS- ADVANTAGES
	TACTICAL	Less surprise		Slower Draw
	STRATEGIC	Carriers are identifiable		Armed citizens not identified
	SOCIAL	Can draw unwanted attention		Does less to normalize rights and defense

I'll "pretty up" the HTML code and FReepmail it to you so you can see what it looks like in HTML.

Having so many categories and sub-categories ("Tactical", etc.) made it a bit of a challenge...

[Lazamataz]

Hopefully some of them will go nuts, in liberlal voting precints.

[TXnMA]

Here's the HTML code: (Not sure it is worth the effort... ) '-}

		OPEN CARRY		CONCEALED CARRY
ADVANTAGES
	TACTICAL	Faster Draw, tactical deterrence		Greater surprise
	STRATEGIC	Armed Citizens a visible presence		Uncertainty about who might be carrying
	SOCIAL	Normalize Rights and Defense		Does not draw attention to yourself
DIS- ADVANTAGES
	TACTICAL	Less surprise		Slower Draw
	STRATEGIC	Carriers are identifiable		Armed citizens not identified
	SOCIAL	Can draw unwanted attention		Does less to normalize rights and defense

The code is far more readable when properly formatted in a good HTML edotor... [E-mail messes up formatting -- especially nested tabs.] :-(

[TXnMA]

LOL! Got crossed up between FReepMailing and posting. :-( The code is on its way via FReepMail...

[marktwain]

Thanks, I appreciate the work that you put in ;-)