Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Defeatist GOP Elites Quit on Mitt
Rush Limbaugh.com ^ | September 19, 2012 | Rush Limbaugh

Posted on 09/19/2012 2:52:45 PM PDT by Kaslin

BEGIN TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: You know, I could be wrong about this, but here's Bill Kristol, who is saying that Romney... Let me get this quote in front of me. I always put this stuff the bottom of the Stack. Bill Kristol says Romney was "stupid and arrogant," and every Democrat under the sun is retweeting it. On the tape, talking about the 47%, Kristol says Romney was "stupid and arrogant." Every Democrat under the sun's retweeting that all over the place, Donna Brazile and others.

You know what struck me about this? During the primary, all these people -- not all of them, but a lot of the people -- who were telling us, "Romney's the only guy. He's the only chance we've got! Romney's the one," they've bailed. They've bailed on him. Now they're running around saying, "He's not the candidate we thought he was gonna be. He's stupid and arrogant," and all these things. And those of you, you and me, who were said to be problematic during the primaries? We're the ones supporting Romney!

We're the ones trying to do everything we can to help get the guy get elected, because this election's about stopping Obama! This election is about stopping the Democrat Party. This election is very important. It's very crucial. I say it again: I don't think that the inside the Beltway glitterati look at it all that way. I don't think they think anything's really at stake here, except committee chairmanships in the Senate, or control over the federal budget, or finding enough people to tell you they'll go on a cruise with you after the election.

But for all of us, this is ball game, the way we look at it. I find it interesting. We're the ones supporting Romney. And the guys that were all-in at the beginning and saying (muttering), "Romney's the only guy who can win. He's the only guy that's electable. He's the only one," now they're bailing on him. You know all they're doing is trying to protect their own reputations. They think everybody else sees Romney as stupid, so they gotta say so, too, to make sure that they're not looked at the same way people are supposedly looking at Romney.

But they're totally misreading the American people on this.

The American people... Democrats are wrong to this, too. The American people are not fit to be tied, angry, insulted, or what have you over what Romney said on that tape. Let's go back to the audio sound bites. Frank Luntz, well-known... What does he do? Well, he's a well-known focus grouper. He's a pollster. (Just a mental block there.) He does all the focus groups with Hannity and so forth. He was on CBS This Morning today and they had a discussion about the "secret" video Mitt Romney recorded at a May fundraiser.

Again, there are two minutes of this thing missing. David Corn of Mother Jones said (paraphrased), "Hey, we got the whole thing! Here it is! The whole thing's there." Bill Jacobson at Legal Insurrection blog said, "No, it's not. There's two minutes missing, and nobody knows what's in the two minutes." Norah O'Donnell, the hostette, says to Luntz, "Now you see a number of Republicans, former Republicans criticizing Mitt Romney for his comment. Is this a turning point in the campaign?"

Everybody thinks Romney lost the election yesterday.

The glitterati, the intelligentsia, the stars inside the Beltway think Romney lost the election yesterday. They really do. That's why it was so hard for you watching television last night 'cause you see all these people on all these networks. "Oh, it's over!" I never met a bunch of quitters like these in my life. I never met a bigger bunch of defeatists! We haven't even had the debates. It's not even October yet. Anyway, here's what Luntz said. When Norah O'Donnell asks, "Is this a turning point in the campaign, Frank?" what she means is: "Okay, Romney stepped in it. Is that it? Is it over now?"

LUNTZ: First we had the 99 to 1%. Now we've got the 47 to 53%. Americans do believe that there's too much dependency on government and they want more personal responsibility. What they don't like is that line in Romney's statement where he says, "I don't care about them." They want a president to care about everyone, regardless of whether you vote for them or not. First you're trying to decide, are you in the 53 or 47; then (snickers) you're trying to decide, do you pay or not?

RUSH: Now, Frank spends all day with these independents who can't make up their minds, and they're now trying to figure out whether they're in the 47%. But they don't like that Romney said he doesn't care. Now, did Romney actually say that? Did he say he don't care about them? See, if he did, it's a problem, but that still is the opportunity that was presented. He's gone places on TV now like with Cavuto. (interruption) Exactly.

What he meant was: In the terms of the election, those people are already committed to Obama in his view. Obama starts out with 47% of the vote, is what he means. And he's gotta focus on the remaining people that he can get to vote for him. But, anyway, you also hear Luntz say, "Americans do believe that there's too much dependency on government and they want more personal responsibility." So O'Donnell then says, "But Romney was suggesting that these people are mooching off the system. He wasn't offering a helping hand. That's how they might interpret it."

LUNTZ: That's the whole issue. It's the interpretation versus what is meant. I want to make this clear: The race isn't over. It's not a game-changer. Not only is it not over, if Romney can change the focus with 23 million unemployed, he's got a tremendous opportunity.

RUSH: There you have it, folks! The expert says it's not over, nowhere near over. And it's not a game-changer, but everybody in the media thinks it is. There was a Politico story somebody sent me last night. It was a Politico headline, or story, and it literally said the race was over last night. It was finished, it was done, because of this Romney comment. Now, Luntz says, "Not only is it not over, if Romney can change the focus with 23 million unemployed, he's got a tremendous opportunity."

I guess what that means is there are some in the 23 million unemployed who would vote for Obama because they want a continuation of unending benefits? My way of thinking -- which I know is crazy, cockamamie, out of the mainstream. By my way of thinking, I don't understand why more than ten or 20% of the unemployed would want anything to do with Barack Obama! Why are they unemployed? Romney hasn't had anything to do with them being unemployed.

Not one Romney policy has had anything to do with unemployment in this country. Not one! The only candidate in this race who can be tied to high unemployment is Barack Obama. Now, somebody explain to me how the 23 million unemployed wouldn't automatically want an alternative to Obama? At least a majority of them. (New Castrati impression) "Mr. Limbaugh, what you are forgetting, sir -- what you are missing -- is many of these 23 million unemployed really blame Bush, George W. Bush, who's really responsible for this!"

Well, there probably is some of that because of the media. But, again, common sense is rearing its head here, and I don't know how you make the case that a guy who has not been in office -- who has never been president, who hasn't had his hand on one aspect of federal policy -- is in any way linked to unemployment. "Mr. Limbaugh you're forgetting something else! There are guys like Romney who are going to increase unemployment by giving all the money to the rich!"

Well, if we've gotten to that point where people think that, then this is all academic anyway, and I just refuse to accept that. I just think this is all cockamamie. I think way too many people on our side fall for this. It's hard to avoid it, I must admit. The media bubble is there every day. Snerdley? It traps him every night! He leaves here with one view of the world after having listened to this program -- and after absorbing the news for three hours later that night, he's back down so low that when he looks up, he sees the gutter.

And if you choose to expose yourself to the modern day so-called news media for any length of time, you're gonna end up thinking the same thing. If you don't think that, then you're gonna think, "My gosh, there's no way. How can we overcome this?" And it's true. There has never, ever, in any of our lifetimes been anything this. We've never seen a news media so activist and in the tank like this for a candidate. Never, never. I mean, to the point of making up news stories, to the point of being ridiculous. The guy in the video caused the riots in the Middle East and ultimately it's Romney's fault?

And they try to do news stories, serious news stories with that premise? Now, I've never understood how the rich steal from the poor anyway. I've never understood the math on that, how the rich got rich from taking from the poor. I know I didn't go to college, but nobody's ever shown me mathematically how that formula works, that the rich got rich by taking from the poor.

BREAK TRANSCRIPT

RUSH: Wiesbaden, Germany, Angelo. I'm gonna get you. How long do you have here with us?

CALLER: I can stay with you as long as you need, Rush.

RUSH: Oh, cool. Okay, what's on your mind?

CALLER: Well, sir, first off: Thank you very much for taking my call.

RUSH: You bet.

CALLER: But I was listening to you during the Republican convention and the coverage after the convention, and it struck me that the advisers to Mitt Romney sound to me a whole lot like RINOs that just don't want to lose their jobs. They're so entrenched in the status quo that they just want to keep it the way it is. That's why they're giving him all this, um, I would say "questionable advice" about not running on Obama's very public lack of a record.

RUSH: Yeah. But he hired them.

CALLER: And that if --

RUSH: Yeah, but wait. It's a known quantity. He hired 'em. Is it their fault or his? He hired 'em.

CALLER: (sigh)

RUSH: He's the one who decides.

CALLER: That's true.

RUSH: He doesn't have to listen to 'em.

CALLER: No, you're right. You're right.

RUSH: It could cut both ways. If you go hire the architects of McCain's defeat and expect something different... So, I mean, they are who they are, is the point. There's not a... (groans) Thanks for the call. I really appreciate it.

END TRANSCRIPT


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Editorial; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: billykrystol; electable; explainingromney; gopprimary; gopprimary2012; limbaugh; romney; rush; stupidparty; theone; theonly; whathereallymeant
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

1 posted on 09/19/2012 2:52:48 PM PDT by Kaslin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

These elite turds may be fine with another four years of Zero destroying the country and being “flexible” with our enemies.

I’m not


2 posted on 09/19/2012 2:56:48 PM PDT by Viennacon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

So, the GOPe shoved this liberals Republican down our throats, and now they are surprised he is who he is?


3 posted on 09/19/2012 3:02:12 PM PDT by svcw (If one living cell on another planet is life, why isn't it life in the womb?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
.


Bill Kristol says Romney was "stupid and arrogant ..."


Rush ... that's right ... Myth (from the "Severely Conservative" Planet Kolob in the Constellation Cancer) Romney ...

is "indeed" STUPID and ARROGANT ...



Myth alienated his "political infantry" (Christain Tea Party members) at the 2012 GOP Tampa Convention ...

Myth alienated his "political infantry" (Christain Tea Party members) at the BLATANT Slanderous campaign against Sarah Palin (starting in 2008) ...

Myth alienated his "political infantry" (Christain Tea Party members) at the BLATANT Slanderous campaign against Newt Gingrich, Rick santorum, Rick Perry, Michelle Bachman, and Herman Cain in the 2012 GOP primaries ...

Myth alienated his "political infantry" (Christain Tea Party members) when he successfully STOLE (for a few crucial weeks) the Iowa Caucus vote in 2012 ...



Myth Romney is a "Pathological Political Liar" (as I stated to NBC News during the 2012 GOP Convention) ...

Myth's thoughts, words, speeches, PROMISES are as worthless as trash ...

appropriately so, I might add, as Myth considers the rest of us "little conservative bitter-clingers" as Trailer Park Trash that he needs to kiss-up to in this election ...




.
4 posted on 09/19/2012 3:04:40 PM PDT by Patton@Bastogne (Newt Gingrich and Sarah Palin will DEFEAT the Obama-Romney Socialist Gay-Marriage Axis of Evil)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: svcw

If Romney loses this, the GOP belongs on the ash heap of history...as Clint said, “...we got to let them go.”


5 posted on 09/19/2012 3:06:11 PM PDT by dfwgator (I'm voting for Ryan and that other guy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin
"Establishment Republicans" lose everytime they're listened to.
They wouldn't caren if they DO lose.
If they can't be in power, they don't want US in power.
It's just that simple.
It's WAR!

"Establishment Republicans" Want to Redefine the Term "Conservative"
DO CONSERVATIVES "ESTABLISHMENT REPUBLICANS" WANT TO WIN IN 2012 OR NOT?

Palin was my first choice, but she dropped out.
Bachmann became my first choice,and she dropped out.
Cain was my second choice, but he dropped out.
Now ... Newt was my second choice, but he challenged Rush.
So now ... Rick Santorum, who use to be my third choice, is now my first choice.

But Romney, ... well at least he's not as bad as McCain was.

Jack Kerwick wrote an article on May 24, 2011 titled The Tea Partier versus The Republican and he expressed some important issues that I agree with.


I'm fresh out of "patience", and I'm not in the mood for "compromise".
"COMPROMISE" to me is a dirty word.
Let the RINO's compromise their values, with the conservatives, for a change.

The "Establishment Republicans" can go to hell!
6 posted on 09/19/2012 3:07:13 PM PDT by Yosemitest (It's simple, fight or die!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

If Bill Kristol says something or someone is “arrogant”, he should know. He is the expert poster child for arrogance.


7 posted on 09/19/2012 3:07:54 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Who among us has not erred? Akin's the One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator

But how are you going to fire all the Republican primary voters? You can’t just say they are too uninformed to vote in the next primary. The same ol’, same ol’ primary people will surely be back again in 2016 and again nominating the wrong candidate.


8 posted on 09/19/2012 3:10:46 PM PDT by Theodore R. ( Who among us has not erred? Akin's the One!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Kristol can kiss my grits. I could care less about anything he has to say.


9 posted on 09/19/2012 3:11:16 PM PDT by libbylu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

I thought since I heard this that it will help Mitt. More people need to know how few people in this country are paying income taxes. That’s the real “fair share” issue.


10 posted on 09/19/2012 3:12:14 PM PDT by colorado tanker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Gee being so great, why doesn’t Bill Kristol run for president?

F him, why should anyone have respect for a “republican” who disses their own candidate toward the end of a tight race?


11 posted on 09/19/2012 3:15:38 PM PDT by Andrei Bulba (No Obama, no way!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Yosemitest

Thank you for posting that.

Bears much repeating especially when there are a cadre of Romney supporters here spewing vitriol at those who refuse to support their guy - on a level they do not dare engage in with Obama’s drones.

As I said several times, the “anti-purists’ as you call them - they hate principled Conservative Christians more than they do Obama and the leftists.


12 posted on 09/19/2012 3:16:23 PM PDT by INVAR ("Fart for liberty, fart for freedom and fart proudly!" - Benjamin Franklin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Viennacon; 2ndDivisionVet; cripplecreek

You know the GOPe elite are getting bad when Mitt Romney is too rightwing for them.

How insane is that?


13 posted on 09/19/2012 3:18:36 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: dfwgator
If Romney loses this, the GOP belongs on the ash heap of history..

Correction: If Romney looses this the USA belongs on the ash heap of history...and a new millennium of world wide Dark Ages will be upon us.

14 posted on 09/19/2012 3:19:29 PM PDT by Don Corleone ("Oil the gun..eat the cannoli. Take it to the Mattress.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

Republicans, meet the Whigs.


15 posted on 09/19/2012 3:25:03 PM PDT by LaybackLenny (Principles aren't worth a bucket of warm spit. I'm voting Romney. God help me.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Don Corleone
Correction: If Romney looses this the USA belongs on the ash heap of history...and a new millennium of world wide Dark Ages will be upon us.

This country and its people are a lot tougher than people like you think.
16 posted on 09/19/2012 3:31:46 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: af_vet_rr
This country and its people are a lot tougher than people like you think.

Unfortunately it's an increasingly small fraction of the people that fit your definition. I'm worried we're past the tipping point.

17 posted on 09/19/2012 3:34:04 PM PDT by nascarnation (Defeat Baraq 2012. Deport Baraq 2013)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: svcw
So, the GOPe shoved this liberals Republican down our throats, and now they are surprised he is who he is?

"Trust us, he's a conservative, just ignore everything he said prior to 2006 and ignore his record as Governor, you're going to like him, he's great!"

These people were scared of real Conservatives, they go and get their precious little abortion, gun control, and homosexual-loving New England liberal through the primaries and into the nomination, and now they decide they don't like him?

I don't believe it one bit. The liberals in the party, and that includes the GOP elites, wanted Willard to win this badly. They are not going to abandon him privately. They wanted somebody even more liberal than McCain, and they trashed a lot of Conservatives along the way to get him. You don't get within a few feet of the finish line and then decide you want to walk away.
18 posted on 09/19/2012 3:35:11 PM PDT by af_vet_rr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kaslin

When I saw Kristol on Fox in the primary, he was not supporting Romney. So he didn’t flip-flop. He was one of the few I saw who did not like any of the primary candidates. If I recall correctly he was pulling for Chris Christie or Jeb Bush to enter the race. So, yeah, Kristol’s squishy on conservatism, but I think he’s been intellectually honest about where he stands.


19 posted on 09/19/2012 3:38:09 PM PDT by JediJones (KARL ROVE: "And remember, this year, no one is seriously talking about ending abortion.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JediJones

I think the effete elites are petrified that conservative values will carry the day. If that happens then there is no more reason to support RINO BS.


20 posted on 09/19/2012 3:40:58 PM PDT by longtermmemmory (VOTE! http://www.senate.gov and http://www.house.gov)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson