Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tax penalty to hit nearly 6M uninsured people (OBAMACARE)
Drudge Report ^ | September 19, 2012 | RICARDO ALONSO-ZALDIVAR

Posted on 09/19/2012 1:13:23 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

WASHINGTON (AP) — Congressional budget analysts are now estimating that nearly 6 million Americans — most of them in the middle class — will have to pay a tax penalty for not getting health insurance once President Barack Obama's health care law is fully in place.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: 2012; 47percent; bhofascism; bhohealthcare; corruption; democrats; liberalfascism; nobama2012; nodemocrats2012; obama; obamacare; obamacaremandate; obamacaretax; obamacarewaivers; obamatax; obamatruthfile; penalty; socialisthealthcare; taxes; tyranny
Main header on Drudge now!
1 posted on 09/19/2012 1:13:30 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

47%......DON’T PAY....


2 posted on 09/19/2012 1:15:32 PM PDT by Sacajaweau
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Sacajaweau

Tax, my azz.. They’ll FINE 6 million people x 1,200.00 ea will raise $6.9 Billion??? That’s not nearly enough to pay for much of anything and it sure puts our over $16 TRILLION federal debt in perspective, doesn’t it..


3 posted on 09/19/2012 1:18:29 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Does it count if a person is on their spouse’s insurance? I assume it does, but wasn’t sure.


4 posted on 09/19/2012 1:19:28 PM PDT by madison10
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office said today the penalty will raise $6.9 billion when fully in effect in 2016.

Taxes just swarm around this debacle of a bill don't they?

5 posted on 09/19/2012 1:19:52 PM PDT by EGPWS (Trust in God, question everyone else)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: madison10

If you are than you are insured. However, under 0bamacare I see most employers dropping health care coverage. That’s one of the goals of Obamacare, to “TRANSFORM” or “CHANGE” into Single Payer System. THAT’S the goal.


6 posted on 09/19/2012 1:22:50 PM PDT by GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: EGPWS
Taxes just swarm around this debacle of a bill don't they?

That's because it's a tax bill, not a healthcare bill.

7 posted on 09/19/2012 1:27:42 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost; Tax-chick

I would think for them to pull this off as a tax, they would have to design a form that would tax EVERYBODY $1200 and then have you claim a credit for having a policy that passed muster and / or some sort of income-limited credit. Otherwise I’d think they would fall into a semantics trap. Then there’s the whole issue on how to document compliance. The bottom line is that it will prove to be so cumbersome that people will see that single-payer is inevitable.


8 posted on 09/19/2012 1:28:45 PM PDT by NonValueAdded (Taranto: "The whole point of the metaphor is that if you can hear the whistle, you're the dog.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

and the cost goes up year after year after year in fines. It’s a dirty bloody secret. Thanks for placing out on the board, for some to see, a truth.


9 posted on 09/19/2012 1:29:58 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

and if that 47% of voters LET this happen by re-electing him so we can’t repeal it . . . then I will not have one ounce of sympathy for them. not one ounce. let the IRS confiscate their usual “refund”. let them feel some pain in their wallets for a change.


10 posted on 09/19/2012 1:37:17 PM PDT by Qwackertoo (Romney/Ryan 2012 The Future of Our Children and Their Children are at stake.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost
Am doubting that is the ultimate goal. I believe the goal to be much more sinister. We will have to not give it (zer0care) time to find for ourselves for this legislation passed based on a lie, and was then upheld on a lie. Remember Americans were told this was not a tax, then the SC said okay, it's a tax. The truth maybe is probably worse than this; the touted cure. Lies never bring good, and the lies told to the public and the continuing lies being told to the public are certain to bring no good for Americans.
11 posted on 09/19/2012 1:37:22 PM PDT by no-to-illegals (Please God, Protect and Bless Our Men and Women in Uniform with Victory. Amen.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

Look on the bright side. They won’t be “middle class” for long and won’t have to worry about that. The debt machine that supports so many idle, “middle class” regulators and services dependent on debt isn’t magic.


12 posted on 09/19/2012 1:44:29 PM PDT by familyop ("Wanna cigarette? You're never too young to start." --Deacon, "Waterworld")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johniegrad

So if I operate a business that has a loss which offsets the insurance penalty, do I still have to pay it?


13 posted on 09/19/2012 2:31:18 PM PDT by sanjuanbob
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: sanjuanbob

Sorry, Bob. Don’t know the answer to that one.


14 posted on 09/19/2012 2:40:44 PM PDT by johniegrad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: GeorgeWashingtonsGhost

starting when?


15 posted on 09/19/2012 2:48:09 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NonValueAdded

I agree - it would be a much more realistic “tax,” rather than “fine,” if it were handled on a credit/refund basis.

However, as you observed, “It’s not a bug - it’s a feature!” The point is for it to be unworkable as passed, so that we end up with a National Health Service disgusting mess.


16 posted on 09/19/2012 3:52:34 PM PDT by Tax-chick (Use the nukes, Bibi!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: GeronL

2014 with full effect of the penalties in 2016. It’s in the article, you know.


17 posted on 09/19/2012 6:14:12 PM PDT by newzjunkey (Election night is 47 days away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey
"I can make a firm pledge. Under my plan, no family making less than $250,000 a year will see any form of tax increase. Not your income tax, not your payroll tax, not your capital gains taxes, not any of your taxes."
18 posted on 09/19/2012 7:10:17 PM PDT by Robwin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: newzjunkey

reading articles is for wimps. I like rushing headlong into ignorance!

:p


19 posted on 09/19/2012 8:33:30 PM PDT by GeronL (The Right to Life came before the Right to Pursue Happiness)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson