Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

This sounds very familiar to the stories coming out of Chicago.

It should be taught in high schools all over the nation. The history of "gun control" in America is a history of racism, corruption, and tyranny.

1 posted on 09/16/2012 10:50:32 AM PDT by marktwain
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: marktwain

Fits right in with Dims wanting to disarm African-Americans who they wanted to oppress too.


2 posted on 09/16/2012 11:04:23 AM PDT by JLS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The strange birth of NY’s gun laws

There is nothing "strange" about 'em.

ALL gun laws are and have been created and enforced by criminals for one of two purposes.

They are: To disarm law abiding citizens so they cannot oppose those same criminals, or...

To disarm Negro persons specifically, for the benefit of the same criminal cabal.

3 posted on 09/16/2012 11:06:56 AM PDT by Navy Patriot (Join the Democrats, it's not Fascism when WE do it, and the Constitution and law mean what WE say.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain
The father of New York gun control was Democratic city pol “Big Tim “Sullivan

Maybe that's why it's called the "Sullivan law", ya think??

I guess most younger people don't remember, or more likely, never knew that, but I'm plenty old enough (75). NYC's gun laws are clearly in violation of the 2nd Amendment according to the USSC's 2 recent recent decisions in the D.C vs Heller and Chicago vs McDonald. Both decisions affirmed the 2nd Amendment as the law of the land, and that it actually means what it clearly says rather than the spurious interpretation that our anti-gun, anti-Constitution critics claim that it means.

But neither the D.C, Chicago, NYC, nor many other big cities plus some entire states are abiding by those decisions. So what more can be done other than a full scale citizen's armed revolt against the laws enacted by the elected officials of those municipalities and states? That would be an open invitation to the feds to intervene with military force no matter which party happened to hold the Oval Office at the time, and there's no way that citizens armed with shotguns, deer rifles, and bottle bombs could withstand modern US military forces equipped with vastly superior weaponry and training. A president is duty bound to enforce USSC decisions by armed force if all else fails, as illustrated by Eisenhower's intervention in 1950's era Little Rock. But the day will never come when a Democrat President will do his/her duty on the 2nd Amendment issue.

Bottom line, unless we gun rights advocates can't win at the ballot box the 2nd A isn't worth the parchment it's written on. I hope all gun owners and all Americans everywhere who revere the Constitution will remember that on the 1st Tuesday in November.

4 posted on 09/16/2012 12:17:18 PM PDT by epow (I stand redeemed by the blood of the lamb)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: marktwain

***Big Tim “Sullivan***

I find it funny that “Big Tim” later went insane and became known as “Mad Tim Sullivan”. He escaped from the asylum and was run over by a train.


5 posted on 09/16/2012 12:31:50 PM PDT by Ruy Dias de Bivar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson