Busted!… State Department Scrubs Damning Memo From Website Following Deadly 9-11 Consulate Attacks

GateWay Pundit ^ | 091512 | Jim Hoft

[Fred]

On Wednesday September 12, 2012 blogger Speak With Authority discovered that five days before 9-11, the US State Department sent out a memo announcing no credible security threats against the United States on the anniversary of 9-11.

The Overseas Security Advisory Council, who posted the memo, is part of the Bureau of Diplomatic Security under the U.S. Department of State.

The OSAC memo said:

Terrorism and Important Dates Global 9/6/2012

OSAC currently has no credible information to suggest that al-Qa’ida or any other terrorist group is plotting any kind of attack overseas to coincide with the upcoming anniversary of September 11. However, constituents often have concerns around important dates, holidays, and major events, Often times, these concerns are the result of increased media attention to the issue, rather than credible evidence of a terrorist plot.

But now it’s gone.

[tsowellfan]

It is difficult to believe that even the Obama Administration could be this incompetent. It is looking more and more like treason.

I agree

[upchuck]

Bump!

[concerned about politics]

It is looking more and more like treason.

Obama’s politics and economic views - anti-colonialism. He apologized to Arabs about “American mistakes”. According to anti-colonialist, western European Christian capitalists with the U.S. as the leader are to blame for the problems of the world.
Taking out the U.S., according to Oboma, is the only way to bring peace to the world.

Yeah. Sounds like treason to me, too. Isn't our military suppose to protect us from this sort of problem?

[CommieCutter]

The state run media is this country’s biggest enemy.

Yep. Without them none of these idiots would be in office.

I'd put liberal institutions of "higher learning" in 2nd.

[Carry_Okie]

Government officials must have performed a search (or seizure) of one's "person, house, papers or effects" to have implicated the Fourth Amendment. Generally, a "search" must involve violating one's "reasonable expectation of privacy" which is determined based on the specific facts of the circumstances.

By this action, government is using a police power to take from me a use of my personal effects without my permission. Effectively, it is a violation of property rights, that my communications are not being used in the way that I intend. Nor do I wish to hear that I gave "permission" when I chose to communicate over a network when the language was buried twelve miles deep in legalese because the service I used was coerced by State licensure.

[Carry_Okie]

BTW, the point of citing the NSA in my post was this: WE need to take out the terrorists in this country. That is what the Second Amendment militia is for. If we rely instead upon police, police is what we will have, and liberty we will have not.

[Carry_Okie]

BTW, the point of citing the NSA in my post was this: WE need to take out the terrorists in this country. That is what the Second Amendment militia is for. If we rely instead upon police, police is what we will have, and liberty we will have not.

[machogirl]

here ya go:

http://libya.usembassy.gov/em_061112.html June 11th composite of attacks (warning)

http://libya.usembassy.gov/em_060612.html June 6th IED attack

“...This incident is a reminder of the fluid security situation in Libya.....” ‘no one has claimed responsibility’ (yes they did)

spontaneous IED’s i guess and AK 47’s. doesn’t every good Libyan citizen carry those around on the way to work and back? /s

[PapaNew]

when I chose to communicate over a network

The issue would be, do you have what people would think would be a reasonable expectation that your communication over the network is private.

[PapaNew]

the point of citing the NSA in my post was this: WE need to take out the terrorists in this country. That is what the Second Amendment militia is for.

OK, well, again, not exactly what we were talking about, but a legitimate issue. Yes, that's a good point - if the government won't do their job (FIRE THEM ALL!) then we'll have to using among others things the "Second Amendment militia."

[mikrofon]

bama Sycophants, Apologists & Communists

[Shady]

WHERE THE HE((ARE BOHNER AND MCCONNELL?

[Shady]

I agree. His Puppeteers have pulled the trigger. Mass world chaos, the Marxists and Islamist’s Dream...

[kenavi]

Sept 6th was the week that the movie trailer in Arabic was released on the Internet.

[Old Sarge]

And the Leftists are swarming Powerline, with their “fact-checking”...

[HollyB]

Ping

[popdonnelly]

As long as he’s not taking any blame, much of which he deserves, he’s gaining. That’s why they keep talking about the movie and how this is not about the U.S.

What we need to point out is that his apology tour failed, and that overthrowing dictators was probably not a totally great thing.

[Carry_Okie]

The issue would be, do you have what people would think would be a reasonable expectation that your communication over the network is private.

I have the reasonable expectation that phone conversations are private.

[Elsiejay]

The late Sen. Frank Church of Idaho was very influential, as Chmn of a key committee, in erecting that infamous wall.

[NCC-1701]

Assuming Obama losses November 6th, could he still be tried for treason after he leaves the White House?