Skip to comments.EPA to America: You will use more biofuels, and you will like it
Posted on 09/14/2012 6:30:36 PM PDT by SeekAndFind
Because we apparently don't have enough evidence of the adverse effects of forcing biofuels into the energy market by requiring traditional transportation fuel suppliers to purchase them, the Obama administration's Environmental Protection Agency has decreed --- oh no, not that they're going to scale back on the renewable fuel standard biofuels quota --- but rather that they're going to force us to purchase larger quantities of biofuels, whether we like it or not. The Hill reports:
The Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) on Friday raised biofuels targets for 2013 despite an ongoing legal battle with the oil-and-gas industry on the issue.
Refiners will be required to blend 1.28 billion gallons of biodiesel which EPA includes in its definition of advanced biofuels into traditional transportation fuel in 2013, up from 1 billion gallons this year.
This action, which meets goals designated by Congress, is another step that strengthens Americas energy security by reducing dependence on foreign oil, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said Friday in a statement. …
Over the past three years, we have doubled generation from renewable energy and today’s announcement by EPA will ensure that we are continuing to utilize biodiesel to help meet our energy needs, create jobs and strengthen the rural economy, [Agriculture Secretary Tom] Vilsack said.
I feel like I am taking crazy pills. How many different examples of the unintended consequences of propping up the biofuels industry do we need before the federal government will admit that they’re wrong? Let’s see. Mandated biofuel quotas (the majority of the market for which is comprised of corn-based ethanol): 1) Produce questionable-to-negative environmental benefits, most notably because they encourage farmers to bring marginal land into production, which in turn stresses the water supply, increases pesticide use, and incentivizes people to chop down forests; 2) Cannot actually survive on their own in the marketplace because they’re more expensive and less efficient — hence why the federal government must mandate their usage — which drives up fuel prices and eats into Americans’ disposable income; and 3) Incentivize farmers to grow corn-for-fuel instead of corn-for-food, which can help drive up food prices, further cutting in on people’s disposable incomes. To name a few.
The suggestion that biofuels mandates are somehow helping to create jobs is downright idiotic. Sure, maybe there will be some more specifically rural jobs created, but across the board and in the long term, mandates like this artificially and unnecessarily make energy more expensive, which means Americans have less money to spend on other things. A.k.a., they make us poorer. And making Americans poorer does not create jobs, it destroys them.
The Obama EPA’s brazen contempt for basic economics is enough to make your head spin.
Time for the EPA to be DOA.
Someday Americans will get rid of the EPA. I sure hope I’m around to see it.
Made a trip this past week about 300 miles on 10% bio fuel avg 27.6 mpg going down, ran around 40 to 50 miles, filled
up on pure gas, avg 31.6 mpg coming back. Used more gas plus
alky than on st gas. Had realized same results on several
trips to NO,LA a few years ago in Ford CV.
I saw the EPA in action todat at work. I teach, but I also work part-time for a shipping company. We serve as brokers to book a certain cargo that goes overseas. The foreign ship owner today announced that they were being required to use significantly more low-sulphur fuels whenever they are in U.S. waters. This will cost them a bundle, which they will pass on the the manufacturer of the cargo, which they, in turn, will pass along to the consumer in the form of higher prices (and fewer jobs). It was all very clear.
Who works for who here?
I say we find the vehicles of those working for the EPA and put sugar in their gas tanks.
As a result of the Obamacare decision, the government can force us now to buy a product or service.
Thank you Justice John Roberts.
If they can force everybody to buy insurance then they can force fuel companies to buy biofuels and we will have to use them no matter how much damage it does to our equipment.
Screw the EPA and its affirmative action queen.
RE: As a result of the Obamacare decision, the government can force us now to buy a product or service.
Thank you Justice John Roberts.
One escape hatch — Only under the threat of a TAX.
True....thank you :)
The E-P-A can kiss my A-S-S.
Stop burning food now.
Dump the EPA!
Question: If Romney wins could he change the EPA and their rulings?
These Soviet style production and consumption quotas and mandates are remarkable. Where would the Soviet Union be without them?
“I say we find the vehicles of those working for the EPA and put sugar in their gas tanks.”
Naah...they will have more than their share of problems shortly after January, I pray. That will be a temporary blip in the unemployment rate that I will cheer. Besides, they can do their civic duty and take a bus to their new employment at Mc Donalds.
“Question: If Romney wins could he change the EPA and their rulings?”
He had damn well better. Or, the next President certainly will.
I don’t know. Once government agencies are in place, they never go away, which is why we must get rid of Obamacare quickly.
Speaking of the EPA, if you buy a new dishwasher, you are in for a real shock. They take forever to run, are noisy, and leave the dishes wet even when you use the dry cycle. Since you have to wait so long for a load to finish, you end up washing more dishes by hand. How does that save anything? The EPA is returning us to the Stone Age.
I’ve got a biofuel for them. Yeah, ...wait. Here it comes. ...Let the head of the EPA fill up on that.
Funny. The left hand of the EPA demands I use more biofuels. The right hand of the EPA makes it almost impossible for someone to sell me biodiesel, which I would use if I could just buy it.
Time to start producing a bunch of Islam-mocking media and attributing it to the EPA...they won’t listen to us, maybe a few incensed muzzies will get their attention.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.