Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: longtermmemmory

I’ve rejected your argument long ago. This is about not being able to support a man who is in direct opposition to my cherished values.

It is possible to conduct a 2-front war in which one of the enemies gets first attention. Iraq/Afghanistan was such a war.

But, just because we destroyed Iraq first doesn’t mean that we gave Mullah Omar a general-ship in the American army. He was, after all, still an enemy.


28 posted on 09/14/2012 2:25:59 PM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It! True supporters of our troops pray for their victory!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies ]


To: xzins

” - - - It is possible to conduct a 2-front war - - - “

I agree, in war and in politics.

What we have here is: 1.) a War to rid our Nation of the counterculture, Communist Obama;
and 2.) a battle to rid the Republican Party of the Bipartisan Cave-In elected politicians that are Republicans In Name Only.

The War to convincingly defeat Obama is compromised whenever the RINO politicians start to Cave-In to Obama BEFORE the voters have a chance to vote Obama out.

The old McCain Days of passing out ‘hold-your-nose-when-you-vote-for-a-RINO’ noseclamps are over, but Romney refuses to believe it.

Romney is totally clueless as a politician and the polls reflect that fact.

If Romney wants to win by a large margin, then he must convince the voters that there is a large difference between him and Obama.

Obama is a Communist through and through. Obama wants to continue to take the US Federal Government on the Communist historically proven track of failure.

Romney must show the voters that he, Romney, is VERY different from Obama.

If Romney can’t do that then Obama will keep on the Communist wrong track, and we lose the War to the Obama Communists.

If Romney can do that, then we win the War against the Obama Communists. Then, after Romney’s election victory, we will continue the battle to hold the RINOs accountable for their actions, in-actions, and cave-ins.

I am of the opinion that Romney will lose the War to Obama UNLESS he shows a greater difference between himself and Obama. Thus, I choose to call out Romney whenever he shows his Socialist inclinations, such as his stated goal of “saving” parts of Obama”care.”

IOW, I have chosen to fight the battle with RINO Romney in the firm belief that unless he rejects his Obama-lite ideas, he will lose the War to Obama by a razor thin margin.

To Romney: To win big there must be a big difference. Tick-Tock.

To those FReepers who find fault with my opinion, let me ask you this question: “Why is there a statistical tie in the Polls between Obama and Romney at this late date if there is a big difference between the two candidates?”


33 posted on 09/14/2012 2:43:42 PM PDT by Graewoulf ((Traitor John Roberts' Obama"care" violates Sherman Anti-Trust Law, AND the U.S. Constitution.))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson