Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Missouri Senate: McCaskill (D) 49%, Akin (R) 43%
Rasmussen Reports ^ | Wednesday, September 12, 2012 | Scott Rasmussen

Posted on 09/12/2012 9:18:54 AM PDT by WILLIALAL

The fallout appears to linger in the Missouri Senate race, with incumbent Democrat Claire McCaskill still holding a six-point lead over Republican challenger Todd Akin. But the race is tightening.

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Missouri
KEYWORDS: 2012polls; mo2012; senateracecloser
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last
To: Uncle Chip

That is because Akin made more stupid statements than all others in my list including “I am not a witch” statement. He deserves the wrath of all thinking republicans.


41 posted on 09/12/2012 10:07:33 AM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat
A big assist from McCaskill and the Dems.

And had his legs kicked out from under him by the establishment Republican party and 80% of the people posting on Free Republic. Abandoned by Republicans and Freepers who pee in their pants when the media say's Boo! Doing so, running away from a solid conservative with a twelve year record of voting conservative.

42 posted on 09/12/2012 10:08:34 AM PDT by listenhillary (Courts, law enforcement, roads and national defense should be the extent of government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

It is hilarious to see the comments here about Rove. They are virtually identical to those at DU.

Of course, Rove has almost no influence within the GOP today
and certainly is not the reason Romney is the candidate.


43 posted on 09/12/2012 10:08:38 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf

In some ways, yes, he was the most solid and experienced conservative. He even voted against the Part D Medicare crap of Bush and Company.

Is he bluntly spoken, yes to his disadvantage, but if you looked and the overall record, characterisics and other issues of the three conservatives that ran in the primary he might very well have the most FR type record.

Is he stupidly rigid and poorly spoken. The answer to that is also yes.


44 posted on 09/12/2012 10:10:19 AM PDT by KC Burke (Plain Conservative opinions and common sense correction for thirteen years.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Strategerist

If you can accept one dead body, you’ll accept a lot more.


45 posted on 09/12/2012 10:10:27 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Republican Wildcat

What is your opinion on post #36???


46 posted on 09/12/2012 10:11:19 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip
If he did that then his polls would not be accurate or objective or believable. So then why should we trust them???

Are you saying that other polls (ie CNN, PPP, WashPost, etc) are to be assumed correct? If that's the case, you should be making millions in comedy and not wasting your time posting on FR.

47 posted on 09/12/2012 10:11:57 AM PDT by SarahPalin2012
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

and your opinion of post #36 is????


48 posted on 09/12/2012 10:13:15 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies]

To: Tex-Con-Man

So people are supporting someone who GOT support from their main adversary?? Ok now that makes perfect sense... sarc.


49 posted on 09/12/2012 10:13:48 AM PDT by wyowolf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

Hayworth had no chance to defeat McCain, GOP “establishment” or not. Nor did it have anything to do with him being re-districted.

If your explanations of the other races is as incorrect they can be ignored.


50 posted on 09/12/2012 10:14:29 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Akin should apologize for his one mistake and then list McK’s many bad votes as mistakes.


51 posted on 09/12/2012 10:14:39 AM PDT by IM2MAD
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: SarahPalin2012

Are yiou saying that Rasmussen is deliberately skewing his polls to favor Republicans????


52 posted on 09/12/2012 10:18:11 AM PDT by Uncle Chip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: listenhillary

Some of us are capable of understanding that stupid statements are stupid statements. And that giving the enemy free ammunition to use against us is a bad idea.

However, if I lived in Missouri I would vote for this dummy.


53 posted on 09/12/2012 10:18:28 AM PDT by arrogantsob (The Disaster MUST Go. Sarah herself supports Romney.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: arrogantsob
Hayworth had no chance to defeat McCain, GOP “establishment” or not. Nor did it have anything to do with him being re-districted.

Good grief, you people are stupid, aren't you? Can't even read a simple paragraph for understanding.

Hayworth lost his seat because he was redistricted into a more left-leaning district, as I said.

Hayworth lost the Senate race specifically because he was running against McCain, who had an almost insurmountable advantage because of his seniority and ability to bring in the pork into the district, as I said.

Go back to school and learn to read, mouth-breather.

If your explanations of the other races is as incorrect they can be ignored.

If you other attempts at "rebuttal" are as pathetic as this one was, then I don't see why I should care what you do, one way or another.

54 posted on 09/12/2012 10:19:33 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Remember - Allah is an ancient Arabian moon god, and Muhammed was a pedo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Chip

Results speak for themselves. No matter of Monday morning quarterbacking changes the results. There are 100 times more candidates who got support of the GOP-e and got elected who were just as conservative as the ones in my list who lost.

There is just no point in defending candidates who are not good politicians, no matter how pure they are. Once they lose they become irrelevant and 100% powerless.


55 posted on 09/12/2012 10:20:49 AM PDT by entropy12
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: entropy12

Todd Akin has not lost an election in 24 years.


56 posted on 09/12/2012 10:21:13 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Yashcheritsiy

In 08 the GOP threw my conservative freshman congressman overboard after he voted against TARP both times. The NRCC stripped him of funds along with Michele Bachmann, Virgil Goode and a couple of others calling them “lost cause races”.

My congressman lot by a whopping 2 points in a consistent GOP district. Bachmann pulled out a win and Goode obviously lost. The Democrat I was stuck with for 2 years then proceeded to vote for Obamacare.

Fortunately we returned my former congressman to Washington against party wishes in 2010 and this year he won the primary with nearly 75% of the votes and the democrats are running a placeholder campaign that they don’t appear to expect to win.

Moderates are lying, manipulative, bottom feeding scum. They will hand a race to the democrats just so they can say they told you so and run someone even further left next time.


57 posted on 09/12/2012 10:21:45 AM PDT by cripplecreek (What does it profit a man if he gains the whole world but loses his soul?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: wyowolf
So people are supporting someone who GOT support from their main adversary?? Ok now that makes perfect sense... sarc.

Actually, it DOES make perfect sense.

To paraphrase the Myth Rom-gay supporters on here, Akin is better than McCaskill, warts and all. Better to have a guy who makes some dumb comment about "legitimate rape" but who will nevertheless vote down-the-line conservatively put into office, than to put one of Obama's most lackyish lackies back into the seat.

58 posted on 09/12/2012 10:22:29 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Remember - Allah is an ancient Arabian moon god, and Muhammed was a pedo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The GOP sure doesn’t have any problem supporting pro abortion Scott Brown. (Who didn’t waste any time rushing out to trash Akin)

Is it possible you are really this dim? Why do you keep throwing out Scott Brown when discussing the Akin situation? You're posts on this subject do not even demonstrate a spark of intelligent thought, so I am left to believe you are just being intentionally obtuse.

Scott Brown has nothing at all to do with Akin's idiotic, campaign killing comments. Brown is pro-abortion. Yes, we know that. There are many pro-abort Republicans. I don't agree with them either, but there it is. Akin is pro-life. I agree with Akin's position, including being against abortion in cases of rape and incest. Unfortunately, Akin made a bunch of ridiculous comments that killed his campaign. Brown didn't do that. Akin is losing to perhaps the most vulnerable Democrat in the Senate. Brown is currently beating the Democrat the left most wants in office. This Senate seat is more important than Akin's ego. This is no different than if the star running back of your favorite football team busted up his knee and he lost a step as a result. It may be sad, it may be unfair, but that running back gets fired and you bring in someone who can win.

59 posted on 09/12/2012 10:25:00 AM PDT by Longbow1969
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek

Thanks for the info, CC. In fact, if you don’t mind, I’d like to use the info about your congressman as some supporting data for an article I’m planning to write today or tomorrow which will be specifically about the GOP-E kneecapping conservative candidates.


60 posted on 09/12/2012 10:25:14 AM PDT by Yashcheritsiy (Remember - Allah is an ancient Arabian moon god, and Muhammed was a pedo)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-128 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson