1 posted on
08/17/2012 10:22:25 AM PDT by
SmithL
To: SmithL
Democrats attacking Democrats? Nothing bad can come of this.
2 posted on
08/17/2012 10:32:02 AM PDT by
MeganC
(The Cinemark theatre in Aurora, CO is a 'Gun Free Zone'. Spread the word.)
To: SmithL
Petey is stark mad and represents exactly what is wrong with politics in general, liberal politics in particular
3 posted on
08/17/2012 10:34:10 AM PDT by
A_Former_Democrat
(Now a Chick-fil-A customer . . . God bless Dan Cathy)
To: SmithL
Term limits are the only way to make sure that creatures like Stark never come into existence.
4 posted on
08/17/2012 10:35:25 AM PDT by
tx_eggman
(Liberalism is only possible in that moment when a man chooses Barabas over Christ.)
To: SmithL
Stark is a Marxist bully with a huge ego and an even larger mouth. Seeing him lose, even to another Democrat, would be a great pleasure.
6 posted on
08/17/2012 10:39:03 AM PDT by
andy58-in-nh
(America does not need to be organized: it needs to be liberated.)
To: SmithL
Now 80, using a cane and seeking his 20th term, Stark is in trouble. The two sides of his political persona - serious policymaker and snarling partisan - are at war on a campaign trail littered with false charges, invective and mental confusion. The outcome may topple not just Stark, but the machinations of the Bay Area Democratic brain trust. Tells you something about the perks of office for the criminal class, and their lust for power, when 80 year-olds don't have the sense to retire and enjoy their lives.
7 posted on
08/17/2012 10:40:13 AM PDT by
Dahoser
(Separation of church and state? No, we need separation of media and state.)
To: SmithL
Stark is an example of why dueling should be legal on the floor of the House and Senate.
8 posted on
08/17/2012 10:42:18 AM PDT by
Truth29
To: SmithL
So what is the benefit of replacing Stark with another Californian? Reduction of seniority for the seat, I suppose.
9 posted on
08/17/2012 10:43:42 AM PDT by
arthurus
(Read Hazlitt's Economics In One Lesson)
To: SmithL
In 2001, Stark narrowly escaped being punched by former Republican congressman and college football star J.C. Watts of Oklahoma. During a debate on sexual abstinence programs, Stark accused Watts, an African American who was not present, of fathering all his children out of wedlock. Watts confronted Stark two days later on the House floor, asking Stark why he had brought up Watts' children and denying that all were born out of wedlock. Stark retorted, "Then how many were there?" Watts had to be restrained by colleagues.Too bad -- sounds like Stark would have gotten a richly deserved beating.
10 posted on
08/17/2012 10:44:53 AM PDT by
Cincinatus
(Omnia relinquit servare Rempublicam)
To: SmithL
Oh come on, so this flaming bats**t lib has a 30+ year career having never had to face any form of serious election competition and maybe he loses one election before he’s carried out feet first? We should all suffer such a horrible fate. His idiot district would elect him posthumously.
13 posted on
08/17/2012 10:51:26 AM PDT by
Attention Surplus Disorder
(This stuff we're going through now, this is nothing compared to the middle ages.)
To: SmithL
Democrats don’t seem to have a problem with electing and re-electing their criminals and crazies. Of course John McCain is nothing to brag about, but he looks like an elder statesman compared to the “best” of the ‘rats.
16 posted on
08/17/2012 10:53:49 AM PDT by
mrsmel
(One Who Can See)
To: SmithL
(Stark) Now 80, using a cane
17 posted on
08/17/2012 11:01:09 AM PDT by
Michael.SF.
(Romney was right about the Olympics, but neither the Brits or the Dems will admit it.)
To: SmithL
Its depressing that this lunatic leftist had to become a senile, cane swinging foul mouthed octogenarian for the GOP to even begin to feel optimistic about defeating him.
And he STILL might win re-election.
18 posted on
08/17/2012 11:01:49 AM PDT by
skeeter
To: SmithL
Fourtney always was a crazy old man. Congress has a lot of them.
To: SmithL
At some point, even in the Bay Area, being a Marxist atheist and a barking lunatic isn’t enough.
28 posted on
08/17/2012 1:03:39 PM PDT by
RichInOC
(Palin 2012: The Perfect Storm.)
To: SmithL
the Bay Area Democratic brain trust.
i.e.
supported by some of the most ignorant easily swayed voters on the planet... or the most stoned. :-}
To: SmithL
“Bay Area Democratic brain trust.”
Now there’s a phrase. Is there some way you can modify oxymoron to express the ultimate? Oxymoronist?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson