Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Vermont jury finds Mennonite minister guilty of aiding kidnapping [homosexual custody battle]
Chicago Tribune ^ | 08/14/2012 | Jason McLure

Posted on 08/14/2012 8:19:18 PM PDT by BurningOak

BURLINGTON, Vermont (Reuters) - A Mennonite minister was found guilty on Tuesday of aiding a kidnapping by helping a woman flee to Nicaragua with her daughter to evade court orders giving visitation rights to her former lesbian partner. The case drew widespread attention as gay rights groups and evangelical Christian groups took opposing sides in the legal battle between the two women over Isabella Miller-Jenkins, now 10. Federal prosecutors say Kenneth Miller of Stuarts Draft, Virginia, helped orchestrate Lisa Miller's flight to Canada and Nicaragua in 2009 with her daughter out of Christian solidarity with her decision to reject homosexuality and her former partner. The two Millers are not related.

(Excerpt) Read more at chicagotribune.com ...


TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: christians; gayadoption; homosexualadoption; homosexualagenda; lisamiller; omosexualadoption; parentalrights; pastor; religiousrights; vermont; virginia
To those not keeping track of this story, this is a long custody battle between an ex-lesbian Lisa Miller and her former lover Janet Jenkins over Lisa's natural daughter Isabella. The couple agreed to raise the child together, but Lisa became a born again Christian and renounced homosexuality. She left the relationship taking her child with her. Janet sued and a court awarded joint custody. When Lisa refused to share custody citing her religious convictions, the judge became angry and gave the lesbian ex-lover full custody of Isabella.

Instead of surrendering the child, Lisa fled to South America, where she is still on the run with Isabella. Now the people who helped her escape are being rounded up by the US government. Sad situation for all involved.

1 posted on 08/14/2012 8:19:26 PM PDT by BurningOak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

Im vay but this is.sickening. God help us all.


2 posted on 08/14/2012 8:24:19 PM PDT by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

Im vay but this is.sickening. God help us all.


3 posted on 08/14/2012 8:25:11 PM PDT by The Cuban
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

Here is a question that is going to come up on appeal, what jurisdiction does the Vermont court have on a 3rd party from another state in a custody agreement? There is a nasty precedent that will be set here as this will probably go to the Supreme Court. I do remember the twists and turns the Virginia Supreme Court had to deal with in this case and they basically punted the ball back to Vermont considering Virginia does not recognize Civil Unions.


4 posted on 08/14/2012 8:25:23 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

Is there a place to donate to this guy?


5 posted on 08/14/2012 8:25:32 PM PDT by ConservativeMind ("Humane" = "Don't pen up pets or eat meat, but allow infanticide, abortion, and euthanasia.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

But the sodomites are delighted.


6 posted on 08/14/2012 8:29:33 PM PDT by Combat_Liberalism
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

Also, Janet Jenkins would have not gotten joint custody in Virginia due to not being a blood relative. If this had not been a “Special Case”, Virginia would have took over the Custody agreement due to the child being physically present in the state. If this was a mother vs step-father case, it would have never made it out of the first hearing.


7 posted on 08/14/2012 8:31:14 PM PDT by ClayinVA ("Those who don't remember history are doomed to repeat it")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ConservativeMind

I have not seen one... I am afraid that at this point the best donations may be books... Sad.


8 posted on 08/14/2012 8:46:34 PM PDT by BurningOak (http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2830849/reply?c=1)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak
Isabella Miller-Jenkins, now 10.

I have never seen Isabella Miller's name with the hyphenated -Jenkins. I think this is more of the liberal bias in portraying Isabella as partially "owned" by the satanic, Christian hater Janet Jenkins. My understanding is that Lisa broke off the relationship, then moved to Virginia where she gave birth to Isabella. For the first 4 years or so, Janet Jenkins never saw the child and never expressed any interest in her. It was only after Lisa became a born again Christian, that lezzie Janet Jenkins sued for joint custody and visits. After Isabella was forced to bathe naked with Janet Jenkins and returned home, with bed wetting & nightmares, that is when Lisa refused to allow any more weekend visits. .... and the RAT bastard Vermont judge in a hissy fit, gave full custody rights to the dyke lezzie Janet Jenkins.

I am a born again Christian, and I simply cannot fathom how God can allow the natural birth child of Lisa Miller to be given to a former, hate-filled satanic, Christian hater Janet Jenkins. God, I pray... destroy this RAT bastard Vermon judge and Janet Jenkins, and all those (including the cowardly Virginia court) who have perpetuated this travesty.

9 posted on 08/14/2012 9:35:42 PM PDT by rcrngroup
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

A judge gave custody to a woman who never saw the child for four years? What a tragedy.


10 posted on 08/14/2012 10:14:46 PM PDT by RginTN
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BurningOak

This Pastor is a hero.


11 posted on 08/15/2012 1:12:49 AM PDT by circlecity
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ClayinVA

I think the biological mother’s mistake that precipitated the whole case was seeking child support from her ex-partner. That gave the other person the right to demand visitation.

In one of the original articles, it stated “Ms. Jenkins signed a promise to pay child support, and they agreed, she said, that she and her parents would remain in Isabella’s life.” If you demand money, you’re keeping the other person tied to you.

If the mother wanted the option to dissolve the union and just move out and never see the other, she shouldn’t have demanded money.


12 posted on 08/15/2012 4:41:12 AM PDT by tbw2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: tbw2
When you lay down with dogs, you get up with fleas!
13 posted on 08/15/2012 4:52:01 AM PDT by Realman30 ("I've already made a donation to Haiti. It's called taxes". . . . El Rushbo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson