With all due respect, we know what awaits our country if Obama is re-elected. We don’t definitively know what Romney will do and that is a far better peg to hang my hat on for the next four years.
I would rather Sarah not be a part of the GOPe gang in any way because when they screw it up, they will again attempt to hang it on her.
Let’s face the facts that Romney is not going to be as much of a screw-up than Obama. But then again, I say he is not screwing up but just the mouthpiece for a plan to ruin this country so his daddy Soros can scrape up the spoils before he moves on to his next game piece.
The fact that Sarah does not get close enough to get any of this mess on her when it explodes gives heartland American types of both sides of the aisle to look to come 2016. Lets just keep the mama grizzly candidates winning down ticket so when she does run, she will have a friendly House and Senate from which to work with.
With that said, we all know how malleable Mitt is so if we have a strong Conservative House and Senate, he can be pulled to the right jut as easily as he was pulled to the left in Mass.
What makes you think Mitt was "pulled to the left in Mass."? When Jane Swift (the former acting gov of MA) announced she wouldn't run, Mitt stepped in as the GOP candidate. I can only assume this was by arrangement -- whoever initiated it -- with the MA GOP. If Mitt had been conservative and declared a run in MA, the MA GOP would have recruited a liberal to run against him in a primary -- that's their MO! In fact, I was surprised the the MA GOP supported Scott Brown -- he's not conservative by FR standards, but he's more conservative than the MA party apparatus. Of course, there wasn't much time in that special election.
The MA GOP a few years back (before Mitt was in) toyed with the idea of putting a pro-abortion plank in the state GOP platform. Not sure why they didn't go through with it officially, but that's where their heart lies. In any case, this past year they announced they weren't going to take social issues into consideration; which really means of course "Social conservatives need not apply!"
It seems to me the national GOP (GOPe, if you will) is rushing headlong in the MA direction.
Your calculation is wrong.
With Romney in the White House and the titular leader of the GOP, if he signs the ICC and LOST and sends them around to the Senate asking they pass it (with the usu. highjinks), then what are the odds the GOP-e crowd in the Senate will vote with the 'Rats to ratify it?
Versus what would happen if a Krinton or a Bozo sent it over, demanding Senate ratification? The Senate GOP caucus would be politically and honor-bound to slam them back in Bozo's teeth! Which means they don't get submitted for ratification.
Bottom line: Mitt in White House => ratification of LOST, ICC, and the rest of that UN sovereignty-seizing garbage.
Think about it, and as you do, revolve the phrase "New World Order" in your head as you calculate the odds that Mitt Romney would act for ratification of those treaties, and go for "sensible gun control", like Bush 41 did, as well. Just think about it.
He would. You KNOW he would..... and he'd be the boss of the GOP, and there would be some VERY lonely conservative Republicans in the Senate if he did.
But show me 67 Republicans in the Senate and Barky in the White House, and I'll show you a stage set for an impeachment and conviction of Barack Obama.
And the last you'll see of him is the big gates of Leavenworth Penitentiary gaping wide to receive both Barack H. Obama and William Jefferson "Slick Willie" Clinton.
Bottom-bottom line: The fate of the Republic does not revolve around helping Mitt Romney get into the White House, but in putting together a strong GOP majority in Congress.
I know the Media has been all about the Presidency for two generations now -- but the Media lie. This time, it's about Congress.
So stop with the heavy (and false) guilt-tripping tactics already.
With that said, we all know how malleable Mitt is so if we have a strong Conservative House and Senate, he can be pulled to the right jut as easily as he was pulled to the left in Mass
Willard was NOT pulled to the left in Mass. He was to the left of Kennedy and bragged about it. Geesh!
Vet the guy will ya!