Skip to comments.Beat GSA!
Posted on 08/04/2012 7:37:24 AM PDT by Kaslin
If America had a Spend Like a Drunken Sailor Award, Navy Secretary Ray Mabus would win hands-down, for blowing $12 million on biofuel for Navy ships.
Even as the armed services face drastic budget cuts under automatic sequestration and other proposed reductions, further undermining our national security, Mabus and President Obama clearly believe its only taxpayer money.
Beat GSA may have to replace Navys Beat Army football battle cry.
In fairness, Secretary Mabuss Great Green Fleet of ships and fighter jets performed well during recent military exercises off Hawaii, burning blends of 50% biofuels and 50% conventional fuels. But the price tag makes the fleet a poster child for wasteful government spending.
The exercises cost the Navy nearly $27 per gallon for 450,000 gallons of biofuels produced from algae and waste grease and animal fat versus around $3.50 a gallon for standard petroleum fuels.
The only way the Navy fiasco looks good is by comparison to the Air Force spending $59 a gallon for alcohol-to-jet fuel and $67 per gallon for camelina-based F-22 Raptor fuel or the Navys 2009 purchase of 20,000 gallons of renewable diesel for $424 per gallon!
If Mabus achieves his goal and persuades the Navy to make half of its fuel green by 2020, the higher cost biofuels could add $1.9 billion annually to Navys fuel bill, according to a Defense Department study. That extra outlay would pay for a new DDG-51 destroyer and comes as the Defense Department budget faces $13 billion in cuts for Navy shipbuilding over the next four years.
Add to that boatloads of additional taxpayer dollars that would be wasted if the Army, Air Force and Marines also switch from abundant, affordable, reliable, proven petroleum fuels to untested, impractical, unaffordable, unsustainable biofuels. The Pentagons green spending spree makes the General Services Administration binge on lavish conferences and entertainment look like chump change.
Worse, on top of paying these enormous sums for biofuels, the Navy and Departments of Agriculture and Energy agreed that each would invest $170 million directly in biorefineries to kick-start the flagging industry, Wired magazine reported. The $510 million total nearly equals the Solyndra debacle.
Whats next in the drive to end Defense Department fossil fuel use? Using fuel efficiency to justify slimming down armor and armament for personnel vehicles, tanks, fighter jets, aircraft carriers and missile cruisers making them more vulnerable to enemy fire? Or shrinking the US military to the size and capability of its French, German or Greek counterparts?
Granted, the Navy biofuels program doesnt turn 40% of the US corn crop into ethanol sending corn prices to record highs during this years prolonged drought. However, our nation does not have enough chicken fat and waste grease to fuel the Navy; collecting and refining this refuse would be a budget-busting logistical nightmare; and camelina and other non-food crops still require vast amounts of land, water, fertilizer, pesticides and fossil fuel energy.
Growing sufficient quantities of algae to meet the Mabus-Obama green fuel pipedreams would require enormous onshore and offshore algae ponds. That would likely send environmentalists storming into courthouses.
Protecting the military from oil price spikes is an equally specious justification. If every $1 in higher oil prices costs the DOD $30 million, as White House climate czarina Heather Zichal claims, a $23 to $63 per gallon price differential between conventional and bio fuel will cost $690 million to $1.9 billion.
As to enhancing supply lines and thus national security, does Secretary Mabus intend to build enough biofuel refineries to equal the conventional refineries and fleet servicing ports worldwide that supposedly do not safeguard supplies? Or perhaps he is planning to commission specialized ships that strain algae from seawater like baleen whales, convert it to fuel onboard, and store it in tankers marked with green crosses that would protect them from enemy fire, as red crosses presumably safeguard hospital ships.
Even ignoring the absence of empirical evidence for catastrophic CO2-driven global warming, it beggars belief that the White House, Congress or DOD would even consider subjugating military preparedness, missions and safety to manmade climate change ideology. Moreover, any net carbon dioxide reductions via DOD biofuels would be more than offset by increases from China, India and other rapidly developing countries.
Fortunately, many in Congress understand that adopting a green agenda for national defense is a terrible misplacement of priorities, as Arizona Senator and former Navy pilot John McCain aptly put it. House-passed legislation would bar the Defense Department from buying biofuels that cost more than conventional fuels, and Senator James Inhofe (R-OK) has proposed similar action in the Senate.
Inhofes amendment to the FY-2013 National Defense Authorization Act was approved by the Senate Armed Services Committee. However, the amendment faces mostly Democrat opposition in the full chamber, and the Senate Defense Appropriations Subcommittee approved continued biofuels funding.
The usual alliance of hydrocarbon adversaries is just as vehemently opposed to bills to address national security, oil prices and over-reliance on foreign sources in a far more commonsense manner: by producing more of Americas abundant but untapped and off-limits petroleum resources. They oppose hydraulic fracturing for the centuries of oil and gas our nation has in its extensive shale deposits as well as drilling for conventional deposits off our Pacific, Atlantic, Alaskan and Gulf of Mexico coastlines, within the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge, or anywhere in the Western US states.
Rather than ensuring that our armed forces can defend America without wasting billions, President Obama and his alliance prefer to wage war on fossil fuels.
Instead of promoting biofuels, the Navy and Defense Department should be calling on Congress and the White House to increase domestic leasing and drilling in all these areas. Even a drunken sailor would understand this.
Secretary Mabus is pretty worthless POS. How Holly Graf incidents were handled is a prime example.
Wasn’t this a direct order from the obegone admin and Mabus just implemented it?
Rest assured that this decision to blow $12-million on bio-fuel did not originate with Secretary Ray Mabus. It came directly from the White House. Now, I doubt that Mabus offered any resistance, but Obama and his ilks in the West Wing made the decision. Obama needs campaign dollars and by padding the palms of the bio-fuel vendors, he will get his percentage back in the form of donations. It is the Chicago godfather way.
Not fully related but GSA has authorized Congress and the Supreme Court to re-carpet their offices at $63 per square yard. 8 of the 9 justices did so. No idea which one did not. Home Depot could have done it for about a tenth.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.