America’s Heart Goes Out to Abused Chick-fil-A Worker – ‘Support For Rachel’ Website Set Up

Gateway Pundit ^ | 08/03/12 | Jim Hoft

[KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle]

A website was set up today so Americans can show their support for “Rachel” the beautiful Chick-fil-A employee who was horribly abused this week by an anti-Chick-fil-A jacka$$.

The website was set up by her boyfriend. He says Rachel may make an appearance on FOX News this weekend.

[Average Al]

Good point. At least she didn’t have a gun in her face or food thrown back at her.

[Earthdweller]

I like her face. She makes me smile with her human “sunshine”. She is beautiful, inside and out.

[R. Scott]

That was horrible abuse? It comes with the territory when working with the public.

[yldstrk]

I agree. She was needled etc but “horribly abused” not even close. She handled it well.

[silverleaf]

her “boyfriend” set up a web site for donations to poor Rachel? ka ching
Disney World here we come

Rachel, dump this loser

[ripley]

“Let’s not push this to the point where it becomes ridiculous...”

One wonders if that “schmuck” would have abused a
six-foot, three-hundred-and-fifty-pound, weight-lifting
male with no space between the two of them, as in the drive-in window.

The big macho-man abused a young lady who was about as menacing as a water lilly and about whom he knew nothing, except for the fact that she worked for a company that has a different point of view from his.

Slippery and slimy is what comes to mind when viewing the antics of this inhuman “schmuck” and “horribly abused” is most appropriate; she’s not a police officer, prison guard or security guard who is paid to handle the irresponsible rantings and ravings of an unhinged lunatic who gets pleasure from venting on someone who is contrained from responding.

He and his cohorts are hell-bent on villifying anyone whose point of view is contray to theirs and if they gain the power they crave they will most assuredly penalize people like Mr. Cathy and by association his employees; totalitarians do things like that.

The “schmucks” antics were in character; incipient totalitarianism is poking its nose under the tent.

IMHO

[GladesGuru]

“I congratulate her on her discipline but see no reason for her to cash in on it.”

The issue isn’t really her, per se. It is America making clear what it values. In this case, her behavior over that of the now fired Mr. Libtard.

[GladesGuru]

” mugging the fruit cake that created the whole brou-ha-ha” was done to the twit when his employer fired him for his public snit.

[Vinnie]

Let’s not push this to the point where it becomes ridiculous. Yes, she did a good job of putting up with a schmuck....

Agree.
Heck, 2 wks. ago I was at a airport kiosk and the man next to me was 'abusing' the agent waaaay worse than this a$$hole. To the point of cursing and physical harm.

Boyfriend having visions of the old lady schoolbus monitor and the $600k she got??

[surrey]

I’m thinking that the boyfriend saw how well the abused bus monitor made out and figured why not give it a try.

[who knows what evil?]

Contrast that picture of Rachel with one of your average rage and anger-consumed sodomite...

[Houmatt]

AWESOME! TOTALLY AWESOME!!

[moovova]

The apology video from AS was 7:47 minutes long.

It was 7:37 minutes too long.

Whatever happened to just saying “I was wrong. I’m sorry for what I did. Please forgive me.”

[Caipirabob]

#26 - OH LOL! I am cracking up over that!

[painter]

...BUT I will gladly donate to her.

Donate for what?

[Ladysmith]

Frankly, I wouldn’t be surprised if Barry made Mr. Douchebag a czar of some kind...

[conservatism_IS_compassion]

My daughter worked at Port of Subs while in college. So many days she came home in tears/near tears because of the bad treatment she received from customers. My daughter is a personable, bend over backward, polite person. She wasn’t giving anyone attitude or talking on her cell phone. Maybe Rachel needs to be the “poster child” of abused, minimum wage, food service workers to give some people a wake up call of the thanklessness of the job they do when one has to have their sandwich right f-ing now.

This ties in directly with my take on the Westboro Baptist Church thing.

It is not true that the First Amendment gives you the right to be heard. It gives you documents your right to speak, and to try to attract an audience (and, implicitly, the right of people to elect to listen to you) but the First Amendment does not give you authority to require anyone to listen.

And like Westboro with its outrageous claims on the attention of people who are at their most vulnerable, Mr. Smith practiced on the good nature which Rachael was expected by her employer to project even when provoked with insults to her employer and, implicitly, to herself for working there. WBC is a pack of bullies, and Mr. Smith is a bully. He presumably thinks he’s the opposite of Westboro - but he is Westboro’s first cousin.

[super7man]

Thanks for the update.

I’ll be there. Never been to a Chick-fil-A but I’m looking forward to it.

[super7man]

I agree about going after a min-wage “easy mark”.
It was disgusting.

I have a knack for writing letters that get a response and I do not waste my time with “little fish” (nothing against Rachel). I go right to the top.

I have recieved responses and free products from Sports Authority, Best Foods, Proctor and Gamble, Arbeys and Ford (and others but I can not remember now).

Adam Smith is a bully and a wimp. He should have gone CFO to CFO, if he had a problem. (I also think he is in the closet.)

What a wuss.