As we march forward in the feminization and emasculation of the military what next for the Navy?
A new enlisted rating Interior Decoratorman?
1 posted on
07/12/2012 11:55:47 AM PDT by
QT3.14
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
To: QT3.14
What’s wrong with having a urinal there and still letting the women use the head.
Haven’t these people been to a Stanford football game?
To: QT3.14
Would this be the new Sitzen Pissen class carriers?
48 posted on
07/12/2012 12:34:52 PM PDT by
USMCPOP
(Father of LCpl. Karl Linn, KIA 1/26/2005 Al Haqlaniyah, Iraq)
To: QT3.14
It seems to me like you could put 3 urinals in the same amount of space as two sit downs. On a ship were space is premium can a woman not use a sit down in the same room as a urinal. A room that has 2-3 urinals and a few sit downs is still gender neutral as long as both sex don't occupy at the same time.
To: QT3.14
I hope they all get sticky buns.
51 posted on
07/12/2012 12:38:28 PM PDT by
aomagrat
(Gun owners who vote for democrats are too stupid to own guns.)
To: QT3.14
What are they going to do with all those 0bummer Urinal Cakes in the warehouses?
53 posted on
07/12/2012 12:38:49 PM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(All libs and most dems think that life is just a sponge bath, with a happy ending.)
To: QT3.14
The LCUs I served on some launched in the 1950s had no urinals. When women joined the crews in the 1970s we had a flip sign on the door of the head. There were no problems.
I sometimes wonder about the men who object to women serving on ships. Did they prefer the company of men and dislike women?
55 posted on
07/12/2012 12:40:59 PM PDT by
R. Scott
(Humanity i love you because when you're hard up you pawn your Intelligence to buy a drink)
To: QT3.14
The change heralded by the Gerald R. Ford class of carriers starting with the namesake carrier due in late 2015 is one of a number of new features meant to improve sailors' quality of life and reduce maintenance costs.Say WHAT!!??? This guy should NOT sell used cars because his line of BS just doesn't fly!!
Thank GOD I served in the Navy when it was still an actual fighting force and NOT a feminazi R&D project!! I'd be drummed out if I were in the Navy today!!
62 posted on
07/12/2012 12:51:35 PM PDT by
DustyMoment
(Congress - another name for white collar criminals!!)
To: QT3.14
Will male service members be written up for leaving the seat up?
To: QT3.14
Do Sailors ever pee off the side of the large battleships? Is it “hard” to do?
64 posted on
07/12/2012 12:55:41 PM PDT by
winodog
To: QT3.14
Will male sailors be ordered to sit to pee and leaving a seat in the upright position become a court martial offense?
To: QT3.14
You left the seat up! Oh my God, we have such fools in leadership positions these days.
82 posted on
07/12/2012 1:42:07 PM PDT by
DoughtyOne
(Remove all Democrats from the Republican party, and we won't have much Left, just a lot of Right.)
To: QT3.14
I predict that men will be required to sit to pee on those ships. I’m not trying to be funny - it’s going to happen.
85 posted on
07/12/2012 1:48:28 PM PDT by
RinaseaofDs
(Does beheading qualify as 'breaking my back', in the Jeffersonian sense of the expression?)
To: QT3.14
I propose a different solution.
All heads should have not only a standard toilet, but both a Urinal and a Bidet.
If designated a man’s head, float a little Battleship in the Bidet. If designated a female’s head, put flowers in the Urinal.
Problem solved.
86 posted on
07/12/2012 1:56:03 PM PDT by
Petruchio
(I Think . . . Therefor I FReep.)
To: QT3.14
Omitting urinals lets the Navy easily switch the designation of any restroom Can you say, UniSex?
89 posted on
07/12/2012 2:23:38 PM PDT by
itsahoot
(The Political Elites are the modern Royals, and the king shall have his due.)
To: QT3.14
It’s not that bad...they still have sinks, don’t they?
90 posted on
07/12/2012 2:36:13 PM PDT by
hal ogen
(First Amendment or Reeducation Camp?)
To: QT3.14
Ummm, why? Women CAN pee standing up.
Jeez, I hate to see the way the liberals are taking this country. They just hate anything male-oriented. Seriously.
Explain to me what they have bent over backwards, ever, to make men feel more comfortable doing at work? Not the donut punchers, real men.
92 posted on
07/12/2012 3:17:57 PM PDT by
Secret Agent Man
(I can neither confirm or deny that; even if I could, I couldn't - it's classified.)
To: QT3.14
How stupid can you be?
(Not you-the Navy)
95 posted on
07/13/2012 8:36:02 PM PDT by
POWERSBOOTHEFAN
(It's hurricane season! Yay!)
To: QT3.14
...
what next for the Navy?
No doubt it will be something faggotish.
97 posted on
07/15/2012 8:36:38 AM PDT by
DBeers
(†)
To: QT3.14
98 posted on
07/16/2012 7:12:47 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(This is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion or satire; or both)
Navy's new gender-neutral carriers won't have urinals That is a dirty lie....I spent 4 1/3 of my six years in the Navy assigned to sea duty and more than 3 of those years were actually out to sea as opposed to being pierside or in the shipyards. There is absolutely no way in hell that urinals clog more than crappers. No way. You get mineral build up in urinal drains for sure and they have to be cleaned out regularily...but crappers clog way more often and require way more servicing. I'd be interested to know if any HT's or DC's or any other rating who got stuck working on the heads would disagree with me.
99 posted on
07/16/2012 7:23:02 PM PDT by
TheErnFormerlyKnownAsBig
(It is going to be Foot to Ass combat on election day....my foot and a Rat's ass.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson